Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    S
    @SteveITS No, I haven't, but I'll do that now. It never occurred to me that if it was already showing a bunch of limits, it might still need the save button pushed. If it doesn't compress logs on ZFS, then it won't be trying in this case. The compression ratio for pfSense/var/log is showing a pretty healthy 14.46x at the moment.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    tinfoilmattT
    @BiloxiGeek said in DNSBL and IPv6: Does it just follow the IPv4 address that is listed above that? In my case it would end up being ::10.0.0.86 Yes. In this specific context that's the notation being used. (Full IPv6 web server address, for reference then, would be: http://[0000:0000:0000:0000:0010:0000:0000:0086]) Nota bene: I use 0.0.0.0 which renders the DNSBL webserver useless and inaccessible, but otherwise returns 0.0.0.0 or ::/NOERROR answers to all blocked lookups.
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    610 Posts
    E
    Updated CE 2.7.2 to 1.86.4_1 Changelog pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:amd64/latest/All/tailscale-1.86.4_1.pkg Freshports
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    699 Topics
    4k Posts
    S
    @Bob.Dig what's the right place?
  • openvpn-client-export 1.9.2 | Viscosity Bundle | ECDSA missing key

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    423 Views
    S
    @jimp thank you for looking into this ticket. Maybe my certs are to old, we can reproduce this on two different systems.
  • HAProxy and RDP

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    734 Views
    V
    @mpatzwah said in HAProxy and RDP: I would like to use for example rdp1.mydomain.de connect to 172.30.30.101 rdp2.mydomain.de to 172.30.30.102 rdp3.mydomain.de to 172.30.30.103 I guess, all these host names are mapped to a single public IP. Then how do you think, they could be differed in the RDP protocol? When I switch to Type=tcp rdp works but i can´t use the rule "hosts matches" or "host contains" Yeah. The host... ACLs target to the host header, which is part of HTTP. Hence it is only available in an HTTP frontend, which is capable to read the header information. is there any way to get this working ? You shouldn't do a naked RDP connection over the internet anyway. So consider to set up a VPN server and go over the VPN, so there is no need use a single IP for multiple RDP servers.
  • PDO library for postgres not found pdo_pgsql

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    250 Views
    No one has replied
  • Package Manager wont load Available Packages

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    7k Views
    M
    Suddenly "Available Packages" appeared. Nothing changed here. Miracle???
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    12k Views
    astroslugA
    Just adding my experiences onto this issue. TLDR; can confirm that the proposed method worked for me. I was seeing not only this issue, but also "Unable to check for updates" in all update-related sections of the Web UI. My update branch was pointing at 2.7.0-RELEASE, but my system was reporting 2.6.0 and the whole system seemed mildly hosed despite still functioning. After following the recommendations here by pointing the branch to 2.6.0-RELEASE, then connecting via SSH to bootstrap the package system, I had this: /root: pkg bootstrap -f The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y Bootstrapping pkg from pkg+https://pkg.pfsense.org/pfSense_v2_6_0_amd64-pfSense_v2_6_0, please wait... Verifying signature with trusted certificate pkg.pfsense.org.20160406... done pkg-static: warning: database version 36 is newer than libpkg(3) version 35, but still compatible Installing pkg-1.17.5_4... package pkg is already installed, forced install Extracting pkg-1.17.5_4: 100% Following that, I tried to run an update via the Web UI, but it said the system is up to date. The branch was now pointing at 2.6.0-DEPRECATED or something like that. I switched the branch back to 2.7.0-RELEASE, and checked for updates via the Web UI again. This time, it looked correct and listed 2.7.0 as an upgrade path. I then carried out a full update. After a nerve-racking 5-minute reboot, pfSense came back online and appears to be operating correctly.
  • Install an older pfSense package with "pkg add" and snort

    pkg downgrade packages
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    807 Views
    JonathanLeeJ
    @bmeeks what's funny is the .11 version works perfectly for me on 23.05.01. I always thought it was my custom AppID stuff until you told me the real reason. I would love a new Netgate appliance that could utilize inline mode and get .SO rules. My wife won't let me until this one dies. I also can't get my 2100 to update to 23.09. But I secretly like ARM too
  • HAProxy and openssl - the 'unrescue'

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    333 Views
    No one has replied
  • 2.6, wrong permissions on "/var/"

    Moved
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ
    I opened https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15054 to fix up the permissions for /var RAM disks.
  • Unable to check for updates pfsense 2.7.0

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @saidin Ok, I found out this thread. https://forum.netgate.com/topic/184195/upgrade-pfsense-ce-2-7-0-to-2-7-1 and applied the temporary fix described here https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/releases/2-7-1.html#troubleshooting, which is to apply certctl rehash Later, I confirmed that I am using my correct branch in System --> Update --> Update Settings and I was able to install the packages that I needed. Thanks
  • LCDproc (Watchguard) broken in 2.7.0

    Locked Moved
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ
    Yes, please start your own new thread. The original issue here is 100% confirmed to be resolved so if you are hitting something similar it has to be a different cause.
  • Zenarmor

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    8k Views
    V
    @chatterbox It says on their website that pfSense+ support has been dropped, but CE is still available. https://www.zenarmor.com/docs/installing/installation#installing-on--pfsense-software
  • Freeradius configuration and users lost after upgrade to 23.09

    Moved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    549 Views
    F
    Discussed here: https://forum.netgate.com/topic/183065/upgrade-of-freeradius3-from-0-15-10-to-0-15-10_1-sets-all-configuration-values-to-default/7
  • System Patches package version 2.2.8

    1
    8 Votes
    1 Posts
    482 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfSense - mailreport - authentication failure

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    L
    @Gertjan Thank you for this clarification!
  • Bind rpz only gives max TTL of 5 seconds

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    546 Views
    R
    Today I did set up another test BIND server under linux configured it from ground up. And result is exactly the same. So this problem is not pfsense related. Its something I do not understand in Bind...
  • Got Crowdsec 0.0.4 installed on my pfSense (now upgraded to V0.1

    7
    2 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @SteveITS I agree in terms of the function. It seems to work with other tools like Suricata or pfBlocker but with similar functionality. I'm willing to give it a shot once its available officially tho. Could be interesting.
  • Openvpn wrapped by stunnel

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    372 Views
    No one has replied
  • Restore missing FreeRADIUS config

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    @slu said in Restore missing FreeRADIUS config: same problem after the upgrade to 0.15.10_1 today Hmmm, rereading https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14806, if the issue happens on uninstall, that would always be the "old" package and therefore the issue is going to affect everyone until after they get on 0.15.10_1. :(
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    F
    Oof, this wiped out my FreeRADIUS config as well. Did a full restore from a manual backup and a reboot. Thank goodness for backups. Can this FreeRADIUS security issue get some love? I deleted all my users (1 user for each phone, iPad, laptop, etc.) to test it, and they're all still able to connect. Using EAP-TLS. That checkbox basically does nothing. Thanks Check Client Certificate CN Validate the Client Certificate Common Name When enabled, the Common Name of the client certificate must match the username set in 'FreeRADIUS > Users'. (Default: Unchecked)
  • User Authentication with FreeRadius and Active Directory - possible?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    Hi @FrankoniaDKB, did you find how to this? I'm trying the same, I want auth users on a Wireless Network but i can't make this work
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.