Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    It was all CVE fixes in the PHP GUI part of the package. See the Redmine ticket here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16414.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    V
    @Gertjan Thanks for your reply – that’s also my impression. The point is: I don’t really see any lists right now that are actually “maintained” in the sense of being actively cleaned up, checked for dead domains, categorized, etc. That’s why my main interest is more about the demand: Would curated lists really be a game changer for admins? Would they be more helpful than what’s available today, or are most people already using other alternatives? If so, which ones? And from your perspective, what would be your expectation towards “community lists”? (e.g. reliability, update frequency, categories, fewer false positives?)
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    700 Topics
    4k Posts
    Bob.DigB
    @HFADmin If it is no Site2Site-VPN then you don't need any gateways in the first place... If that is true but you want to monitor the connection then you could create dummy-gateways just to ping the remote ip-addresses.
  • bind 9.16_13 - rndc delays

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    967 Views
    No one has replied
  • NMap scan GUI timeout fix

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    669 Views
    No one has replied
  • Cron-Package sort by time

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    616 Views
    No one has replied
  • squid / squidguard reliability

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    @michmoor Thank you a lot for this clear answer, I will follow your advice for next questions.
  • FreeRadius - Mac addresses treated as Users

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Thats perfect... Will give it a try tonight. Thanks @NogBadTheBad
  • [Sovled]ntopng unable to start

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @scorpoin Solved . I removed the check ```Keep Data/Settings then uninstall the package and reinstalled it ,every thing works fine . But I lost all previous gathered data :( . Regards
  • Build DHCP6c from source on SG-1100

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    553 Views
    No one has replied
  • pimd - doesn't appear to work

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    Cloudless Smart HomeC
    @kmarston fixed it, thanks!
  • BIND/Avahi/radiusd packages missing from 2.6.0?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    @johnpoz - both of those packages appear to now be in the "available packages" list. Seems odd that for a couple hours they (BIND/Avahi) were 'missing' from the list, but hours later appear. Following the commentary from posts about "install from scratch" (using the copy config.xml to USB for restore) - only impact was where those two packages were absolutely required. Interesting on the naming aspect. Under 2.5.2, made sure that all the packages had been on the latest version, prior to upgrade. Not sure if that artifact is useful. While a bit off topic - where BIND/Avahi weren't required, the process was flawless and (as others have noted) there appears to be a sense of increased performance. (Hats off to folks responsible) Thanks!
  • new System Patches v2.0

    Moved
    21
    1 Votes
    21 Posts
    5k Views
    chudakC
    @luckman212 said in new System Patches v2.0: @jimp I had to flip my update branch from 22.05 to 22.01 in order to see the 2.0_4 version. I installed it and then flipped back to the 22.05 track. Is that "normal"? I didn’t have to do this FYI
  • HAProxy shared front end error files

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    593 Views
    No one has replied
  • LCDproc port

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    The end result (that wouldn't involve recompiling my own kernel/drivers etc) was to simply change the VID/PID in the display from the out of box settings of 0x1b3d/0x0155 to the FTDI defaults of 0x0403/0x6001. You can do this with "FT_Prog" on another computer running Windows or you can do it with another computer using "ft232r_prog" on Ubuntu Linux..... sudo ./ft232r_prog --old-vid 0x1b3d --old-pid 0x0155 --new-vid 0x0403 --new-pid 0x6001 ft232r_prog: version 1.25, by Mark Lord. eeprom_size = 128 vendor_id = 0x1b3d product_id = 0x0155 self_powered = 0 remote_wakeup = 0 suspend_pull_downs = 0 max_bus_power = 500 mA manufacturer = MO product = LK202-25-USB serialnum = 01wwkXXX high_current_io = 0 load_d2xx_driver = 0 txd_inverted = 0 rxd_inverted = 0 rts_inverted = 0 cts_inverted = 0 dtr_inverted = 0 dsr_inverted = 0 dcd_inverted = 0 ri_inverted = 0 cbus[0] = TxDEN cbus[1] = TxDEN cbus[2] = TxDEN cbus[3] = PwrEn cbus[4] = TxDEN Rewriting eeprom with new contents. /tmp/MO/ft232r_prog-1.25$ sudo ./ft232r_prog --save MO-lk202-25.dump ft232r_prog: version 1.25, by Mark Lord. MO-lk202-25.dump: wrote 128 bytes eeprom_size = 128 vendor_id = 0x0403 <---- IT'S DIFFERENT NOW product_id = 0x6001 <---- AND THIS IS TOO self_powered = 0 remote_wakeup = 0 suspend_pull_downs = 0 max_bus_power = 500 mA manufacturer = MO product = LK202-25-USB serialnum = 01wwkXXX high_current_io = 0 load_d2xx_driver = 0 txd_inverted = 0 rxd_inverted = 0 rts_inverted = 0 cts_inverted = 0 dtr_inverted = 0 dsr_inverted = 0 dcd_inverted = 0 ri_inverted = 0 cbus[0] = TxDEN cbus[1] = TxDEN cbus[2] = TxDEN cbus[3] = PwrEn cbus[4] = TxDEN No change from existing eeprom contents. Once that's done, you can plug it back in to pfsense and the driver will pick it up and ugen will do it's thing etc.... You'll finally end up with all of the /dev/cuaU0 /dev/cuaU0.init /dev/cuaU0.lock things that you need in /dev/ that you can then use to point the webUI/lcdproc towards.
  • How to setup FreeRADIUS + MySQL

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    532 Views
    No one has replied
  • HAProxy

    haproxy
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    804 Views
    No one has replied
  • Process to get package into official repositories?

    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    898 Views
    bmeeksB
    Typically I believe the Netgate team expects a pull request against the appropriate GitHub repository. For packages, that would be ../pfsense/FreeBSD-ports available here: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports. There are some specific requirements in order for packages to work within the pfSense ecosystem. You can look over some of the packages to see what those are. GUI packages will start with the string "pfSense-pkg-*". Any underlying binary component is assumed to exist within the regular Ports tree of FreeBSD.
  • HAProxy - Shared Front End but Do not Use CSP

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    yeah - knew it must be a stupid question. found the option to add the CSP to the specific backend rather than in the shared frontend. all good
  • Backup package causes crash report in pfSense 2.6.0

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    GertjanG
    @robert_knabe As far as I know, no one is complaining about the small file size handling capability of pfSense. The RRD files will still fit into the confiig file, and if logs are important (they are for me) an external syslogger shiould be used. But, why not, if you want, you can modify the php.ini file, as that's the way to change memory available to PHP. Two options : Write a small shell script that modifies the memory_limit if it doesn't contain the right value for you. Have this script started with the startcmd pfSense package. Use commands like 'sed' to replace a text in the file. You probably have to restart the PHP-FPM to take the new setting in account. Or, edit the php.ini file, and keep the old one. Create a diff file from these two files. Use the diff file and the pfSense patch package to patch the existing php.ini file. You will still have to restart php-fpm to have the modification taken in account. Both solutions will persist even after a pfSense upgrade. You could add a feature request, just keep in mind that it would be granted only if a lot of people are asking for it.
  • pfsense squid reverse proxy emails with attachments not sent via mac os

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    508 Views
    No one has replied
  • avahi mDNS - enable verbose mode?

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    759 Views
    No one has replied
  • Upgrading to 22.01 from 21.05.2 services broken

    Moved
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    880 Views
    viktor_gV
    Please show the contens of /usr/local/etc/avahi/avahi-daemon.conf, and tail -n 50 /var/log/system.log output after restarting Avahi.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.