Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    It was all CVE fixes in the PHP GUI part of the package. See the Redmine ticket here: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/16414.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    V
    @Gertjan Thanks for your reply – that’s also my impression. The point is: I don’t really see any lists right now that are actually “maintained” in the sense of being actively cleaned up, checked for dead domains, categorized, etc. That’s why my main interest is more about the demand: Would curated lists really be a game changer for admins? Would they be more helpful than what’s available today, or are most people already using other alternatives? If so, which ones? And from your perspective, what would be your expectation towards “community lists”? (e.g. reliability, update frequency, categories, fewer false positives?)
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    700 Topics
    4k Posts
    Bob.DigB
    @HFADmin If it is no Site2Site-VPN then you don't need any gateways in the first place... If that is true but you want to monitor the connection then you could create dummy-gateways just to ping the remote ip-addresses.
  • Netgate Firmware Upgrade package not working after move to 0.51

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    970 Views
    J
    Disregard. Upgraded OS to pfSense 22.01 and the package works fine now.
  • HAPROXY strange error after adding http-redirect frnt end

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    452 Views
    No one has replied
  • Anyone could create a Fast.com widget based on the speedtest-widget one ?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    551 Views
    No one has replied
  • Is a new package version available for new pfSense version?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    964 Views
    ?
    @steveits Thanks again! Yes, if I configure System -> Updates to stay at 2.5.2 (DEPRECATED) I do not see any available updates for my apps. But when I change to 2.6.0 I see updates for some of the apps. Still not for all, but this should be not an issue as they will run anyways- because there is no red sign then. Ok, I think I got it! Thanks a lot! /KNEBB
  • FreeRADIUS: Attributes Conflicting with GUI Login

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    N
    @nogbadthebad Correct. Supermicro IPMI. Most of my searches found people having issues getting authentication working with Supermicro. My issue is that all other devices that use RADIUS for authentication are all working (UPS’s, Supermicro IPMI, TrippLite PDU). It’s just the pfSense itself.
  • HAProxy and other hosted sites on the same IP

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    990 Views
    S
    Not sure if you figured it out already since this post is a few days old, but I think you need to do two things: Remove your "Default Backend" entry (if you have a default entry, everything will be sent to that backend, regardless of the ACL you defined above) For the "Use Backend" action, you wanna populate the "Condition Acl Name" field or else the action wont match. So in your case, set the "condition acl name" to "LookingGlass" (the name you gave your "Host Matches:" ACL) You now should get a 503 error for all other requests until you define another acl that matches the host name and send that to the same (or a different) backend via another "Use Backend" action entry. Hope this helps. Still a beginner with ha proxy so not sure if this is the way to go, but for me in a similar situation that was what I had to do.
  • Shalla URLblacklist for Squidguard service has been stopped.

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    JonathanLeeJ
    @darnoldvcs where was this file stored no the pfSense filesystem?
  • No updates with adguard home

    updates
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    ?
    @camagur, and the mistake? which ?
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    U
    @jonathanlee Thank you for the insight and pointing out my miss configuration. I didn’t see it till you said something. Where I had loop back 127.0.0.1 I should’ve had IOTWiFi addresses. I used the net gate recipes for redirecting DNS and applied it to NTP. Have a good weekend
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    984 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfSense honey pot VM package? 🍯

    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    863 Views
    No one has replied
  • I made a WireGuard package for pfSense

    178
    18 Votes
    178 Posts
    125k Views
    J
    how can i manually remove this wireguard go version on my 2.4.5 system.I want to update my firewall and use the latest wireguard package..
  • openvpn-client-export -> Sent to email

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    B
    The security issues here would be somewhat less of a problem if OpenVPN didn't store the client certificate's private key in plain text in the config file A possible modification to the OP's suggestion based on some responses here: an option to email the client config file as an encrypted, passworded zip file. After that it is on the VPN admin to ensure that the encrypted zip file's password is communicated by an alternative communications method.
  • Suricata logging configuration

    suricata rsyslog syslog
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    998 Views
    No one has replied
  • Captive Portal takes 1 hr to start

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    999 Views
    GertjanG
    @toyinal said in Captive Portal takes 1 hr to start: Unfortunately reinstalling will be the last resort since it’s the production system Re installing ? You're using pfSense - not some "Windows 10" PC ;) All settings are in one file, the file you backup every day (do you ?). If the system fails - as hardware does all the time, you can get back online in minutes. Because : you import one file, and all is back to normal. This makes settings testing with default settings so easy. It also validates your backup and urgency plan. @toyinal said in Captive Portal takes 1 hr to start: but less number of Ethernet ports What happens when you disable all non needed ports ? Without having any details, so I just presume, it's a hardware issue. I know it can boot normally, as you and I use the same software. The difference is : hardware drivers for the NIC's involved and settings.
  • Wireguard package do I dare?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    914 Views
    S
    @rob_kae The answers one gets at this forum is just the best! Thank you! If you want a VPN provider with native wireguard support no look no further than to ovpn.com. :)
  • 6 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    R
    Solved the issue for me. I had to restart the ntopng service. Thank you.
  • Ditching Untangle after several years, need help!

    Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    477 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    780 Views
    No one has replied
  • EZIO-G500

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    545 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.