• Dead Peer Detection

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    dotdashD
    Check out IPSec config on the new 1.3AlphaAlpha builds- It has DPD and more.
  • Remote Access

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    dotdashD
    IMO, IPSec is more suited to permanent site-site connections. OpenVPN is more secure, but needs a client-side app. PPTP may be a better choice if you need occasional access from various places- you can use the stock VPN wizard on Windows boxes.
  • IPSec will not connect (racoon: couldn't find configuration)

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5k Views
    No one has replied
  • Cisco PIX disconnect issue.

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    10k Views
    D
    I've found a confirmation of what heiko said about the identification mode with a preshared key, in the source code ipsec_doi.c /* In main mode with pre-shared key, only address type can be used. */
  • IPSec Mobile Clients

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Racoon "unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER"

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    7k Views
    No one has replied
  • Mobile IPSEC issue

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    H
    1.21 isn´t available at the moment
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec tunnel between dhcp and NATed PFsense boxes

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    4k Views
    S
    I cannot explain it but things just started working… I didn't make any changes, but after letting it sit a few days, the tunnel just came up on its own. Thanks for all the great help from this thread - I'm sure it was something from here that was the cure!
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Pfsense - Non pfsense IPSEC VPN…. not working....

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    23k Views
    H
    fine
  • Pfsense with pfsense site to site - cannot "see" each other

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    GruensFroeschliG
    You cannot "see" them in your network places because of the same reason you cannot play games over a VPN. The discovery of windows shares works via UDP broadcasts which dont get routed. If you want to access a windows share on the other side of a tunnel, you can do that directly via the IP of the destination computer. Another possibility would be to set up a WINS server on the other side of the tunnel, which resolves your SMB-names into IP's. You really should read up on how routing works and what it means, since you seem to run into the same problems over and over again.
  • Packets not routed across functioning IPSec tunnel

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    I think I figured this one out on my own… I had to change my setup to advanced outbound NAT, create two NAT rules (one for each WAN interface), and make sure that the remote subnet was excluded from those rules.  There is still no route to the remote subnet that displays in the web interface, but maybe that's normal.  I'm just used to seeing one having come from a Linux/OpenSwan world. So, judging from what I had to do, I'm assuming the NAT portion of the packet processing happens prior to the routing?  It seems like you should figure out where the packet is headed before you figure out if it needs to be NAT'ed or not.  ???
  • EZVPN with Cisco ASA's

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    I think with EZVPN server on the ASA, no. I think you can setup a pure IPSec SA on the ASA which can work with FreeBSD/pfSense.  I believe the considerations are the same as for regular FreeBSD. http://www.google.com/search?q=FreeBSD+IPSec+PIX I hope this helps, or at least does no harm. :-)
  • Has anyone done anything like this before (ISCSI over IPSEC VPN)

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    6k Views
    M
    Use rSync instead of iSCSI, FTP or SAMBA … There are rSync client and server for Windows out there. That is fast reliable and it's designed to work over unreliable network. Plus the algorithm of rSync will only send what have changed in your file instead of sending everything back. So your file of 1.5 GB could be backed up in less than 100 KB if only small portion of the file where changed. I have several rSync configurer on Windows as server and client and it's working great. Then you schedule a batch file. Instead of using IPSec VPN you could use SSH tunnelling again available a client and server for Windows Here is the site you should look at: http://itefix.no/cwrsync/ If your more serious about backup, you should also check Ahsay Online Backup Server. That's what we use at work, we have an offsite server in a datacenter running Ahsay OBS there's about 150 GB of data there backup takes less than 30 minutes each day... Ahsay technology is based on rsync. We have used Storegrid for a year and the backup set got corrupted ... We have switched to Ahsay for that reason. MageMinds
  • Few newbie questions

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    H
    ;) regards heiko
  • Couldn't find the proper pskey

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    31k Views
    J
    Hi Heiko, thank you very much for the detail reply. I will test with greater lifetime and search the forum for better lifetime setting. Thanks again.
  • Routing through IPSec tunnel

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    please take a look….. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,3701.0.html
  • Routing specific ports through router at other end of ipsec tunnel

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    Z
    Except I want to do it by port, not destination IP.
  • Pfsense 1.2 stable with IPSEC trough WAN 100Mbps reboots the box

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    C
    I've beaten the hell out of a WRAP with a Xeon server as the other end point and it was never unstable. That sounds like an ALIX, which I haven't put through the same rigor yet. It's kernel panicing, so you're hitting either some sort of FreeBSD bug or hardware problem. Can you follow this: http://devwiki.pfsense.org/ObtainingPanicInfoForDevelopers and get us the results from when it panics? Assuming you can reliably replicate it, or at least replicate it once. you can email it to me (cmb@pfsense.org), it'll be pretty long.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.