It's now 3 days since I emailed wikiadmin@pfsense.org for a Wiki Account and have not heard as yet.

If something is actually relevant, someone can click 'report post' and ask a mod to unlock the topic. (Or start a fresh thread to ask about it, and link back to the old thread)

It's fairly rare, but we have had people come back months/years later to update a forgotten thread they started or were talking on to share a final resolution or workaround. In that case, one of us unlocks the thread and they can post in it no problem…

Occasionally we'll go back and edit a locked thread if it turns up high in Google searches for a particular topic as well, to lead people to better/more accurate info. In those cases if the thread were unlocked it would probably get a lot of irrelevant posts that would be better served by new threads.

Ok I have corrected the first entry.  And pointed to the tutorial from the tutorials section, that other link must of expired, ie no longer existed.

the other item doesn't make any sense - someone else must of edited the docs section already for what you were talking about.

Your best bet would probably be to contact the author of apinger (util used by pfSense to monitor gw up/down status)

@TooMeeK:

Does this server run in virtual env + snapshots?
Are there additional plugins?

Source for SMF 2.0:
http://download.simplemachines.org/

I see many queries to this server (because many people read / post), are You sure Your hardware is capable to serve it? And will with SMF 2.0?

This is a known problem with SMF 1.1.16…  It is not a problem with SMF 2.0.2 which I can confirm...

thanks, reported that to the admin of that site (I don't have an account there).

Cool. Didn't see that setting before. Thanks!

There have been a few such threads in the "General Discussion" board here, feel free to start a new one. Things change from time to time so people will probably chime in and show off what they've done.

The General Discussion board isn't so high-volume that we'd need to filter things like that out yet, so having a separate board wouldn't be a good idea (unless we start getting dozens and dozens of threads there about the same topic :-)

@cmb:

If you push it out to the branch level, that's easier, your description made it sound like you wanted to recreate Plixer's Scrutinizer product from scratch or something similar.

But in this situation i cant see traffic statistic per user in branch? Its not usable for me :(
I think in my case netflow collector are needed (on LAN interface before NAT), and need to combine login+logout time for user with timestamp+IP+data block size in netflow log.
AFAIK, it is possible to do by standard freebsd tools + some corrections is web scripts. Isn`t it?

Wurf!  I was thinking of holding off til the new release, but it looks as tho it might be a wee while yet.  Beaucoup de ta.

Just add the hostname to an alias and don't bother with the intermediate step. :-)

Ok, so no https there.
Thx for answer.

You mean newbie?

with a typing lot of posts/replys, but still keeping nonsense as minimum :D

It's possible your regular mail server rejected the message or was unreachable for some other reason.

If you PM me your other e-mail address I can clear the old one out of the system.

you can send it when you're asking for help, atleast on the very same post

Glad to hear it.

Thank you for reply.  ;)

Post edited ;)