You can do that on 1.2.3, just read again the guide ( about multiwan ) from your first post

Anyone?

It looks like i am having the exact same problem as here - http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,36966.0/wap2.html I guess there was never a fix of this and i am sure my ISP use Cisco equipment their end  :(

whoops, thank you for that! :P

Carp: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Configuring_pfSense_Hardware_Redundancy_(CARP) Other guides: http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Tutorials

http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1837 I'm not sure anyone is actively working on that - it won't be fixed until 2.1+ and attention is focused elsewhere. If you discover anything (or a workaround), etc, then update the ticket.

I've started a new topic in IPSEC http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,42025.0.html

Eh, doesn't matter.  I talked to the project manager earlier today and Comcast is supposed to be making some "network configuration changes" to directly hand off the /27 at their switch.

videocache not free. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thank.

can you send your lan rules to view?

you need to have a firewall rule setup on your LAN interface to direct traffic from the computer with sabnzb through the gateway group you created that has both WANs P.S. you may want to bump up the number of connections to your NSP from 8, to 12. also, 99% of binary NSP's out there dont allow more then 1 IP to be connected at any given time, so you are going to need to have 2 service providers for this scheme to work, since you have dual WAN's and each interface is assigned a unique IP

"TIER" is only the order in a Gateway Group. It only defines which Gateways should do loadbalancing and to which it should failover if a gateway goes down. The bandwidth of the gateways is totally unneccessary for this option. To change the options for bandwidth usage like I described above go to: SYSTEM -> ROUTING -> GATEWAYS -> Edit -> ADVANCED -> Weight

The above post was done in a bit of a hurry.  Now I've had a chance to look through the config XML and the gateways section showed:         <gateways><gateway_item><interface>wan</interface> <gateway>dynamic</gateway> <name>GW_WAN</name> <weight>1</weight> <interval><monitor_disable><defaultgw></defaultgw></monitor_disable></interval></gateway_item> <gateway_item><gateway>dynamic</gateway> <name>GW_OPT2</name> <interface>opt2</interface></gateway_item></gateways> I changed it to look like this and all seems to be OK.         <gateways><gateway_item><interface>wan</interface> <gateway>dynamic</gateway> <name>GW_WAN</name> <weight>1</weight> <interval><monitor_disable><defaultgw></defaultgw></monitor_disable></interval></gateway_item> <gateway_item><interface>opt2</interface> <gateway>dynamic</gateway> <name>GW_OPT2</name> <weight>1</weight> <interval><monitor_disable></monitor_disable></interval></gateway_item></gateways> I suspect it might have been corrupted when I switched this interface to PPOE after finally working out how to get the old ADSL modem to run in bridge mode. Biggsy

@npintong: pfsense can make sub interface on lan ? example . i have 2 NIC one for WAN and one for make sub interface linke rl0.1 rl0.2 rl0.3 for may segment. Yes, but put ip-addresses only vlans, not physical interface. same as cisco notation fa0/0 = no ip-address and fa0/0.15 = ip-address @npintong: i have study CCNA course about VLAN and then if want vlan can communicate togetter we will use the InterVlan (Cisco Concept) it mean that want to use router or switch layer 3 for routing many segment. and need to make subinterface on router or switch layer 3 if i use Pfsense instead of Switch Layer 3, i can work like this that i want. And Yes, you define by firewall rules inter-vlan access

Without the knowledge of how you want to use ip-addresses i think that it could be done, but you loose failover properties because of single point of failure(which are loadbalancer pfsense and switches)

I don't have even a glue, what it would be. I haven't seen that kind of error

start by using search. there is lot of discussion on that topic