• PFSense behind static NAT cannot remotely administer

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    I

    Never mind, I was looking at the wrong PFSense box I had a source limitation.

  • Port forward mail web behind pfsense[SOLVED]

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ

    For the firewall rules you most likely do not want to set a source IP or port.

    The destination of the firewall rule should be the target of the port forward, not "lan net".

    Go over the following docs carefully:

    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/How_can_I_forward_ports_with_pfSense%3F
    http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Port_Forward_Troubleshooting

  • NAT does not work in LAN

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Wow, lot of information ;)

    My crystal ball says that your acl rules are set from outside net and not from inside to use that nat.

  • Automatic outbound NAT not NAT'ing any outbound packets

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    It's not issue in any rc i've tested, but here in common if you're asking help you should have always updated to the latest build. There are always lot of changes between snapshots.

    Have you updated? does this problem exists?

  • Port forwarding not functioning

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    Only to http is needed, but in both source and destination.
    Are you trying to access from outside or inside network?
    can you view screenshots of your wan rules and port forwarding?

  • Problem port not open

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    Will you edit first post subject with [solved]

    What was the problem afterall?

  • Nat 1:1 Question about 2.0

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    M

    As i stated before, i haven't used 1:1 so i can't give you exact answer

  • IPsec with NAT reflection

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Is it possible to NAT one LAN interface but not another?

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    7k Views
    A

    cmb: you are correct.  I deleted those rules (the ones I had selected "do not nat" for)
    and that works fine.  Since the rules get auto-created when you select "manual", I had
    the (wrong) impression they were necessary.  Makes more sense now.

    Thanks,

    Mark

  • How do I statically assign my LAN IP addresses in pfsense?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    14k Views
    U

    Thank you for your solution it worked. Wenn Sie Deutsch sprechen, sage ich "Vielen Dank".

  • Help:port forward

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    N

    Look
    I Have 3 wans
    wan1: 10.10.2.254/24
    wan2: 10.10.3.254/24
    wan3: 10.10.4.254/24
    One lan
    LAN 192.168.2.254/16
    with load balance.
    now if i port forward as
    Interface: lan
    Protocol: tcp
    Destination: 66.63.184.209
    Destination port range: http
    Redirect target IP: 208.69.36.135
    Redirect target port: http

    it work

    if i port forward as
    Interface: lan
    Protocol: tcp
    Destination: 66.63.184.209
    Destination port range: http
    Redirect target IP: 192.168.2.254
    Redirect target port: other : 8001
    not work.

  • Web server behind pfsense

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    7k Views
    E

    you don't really need both public IP's

    solution: to create a NAT rule to forward the request
    steps to take on the multi-wan:
    1. logon to the multiwan device
    2.Navigate to Firewall>Aliases>create new alias
              i.name: yourwebserver
              ii. Description: webserver
              iii.Type: Host(S) , add 192.168.77.0 as yourwebserver
              iv. Save

    3. navigate to Firewall>NAT>port forward and create a new rule
    4.Interface for the rule to apply:- (WAN)
    i. protocol :- TCP
    ii.source:- any
    iii. destination :- WAN Address (your public IP)
    iv. destination port range:- HTTP
    v. Redirect target IP:- 192.168.77.0 (alias: yourwebserver)
    vi. Redirect target port:- HTTP:8080
    vii.Description:- NAT to webserver
    viii. NAt reflection-: default
    ix.Firewall rule association: Add associated filter rule
    x. Save

  • [SOLVED] Standard port forwarding from WAN -> DMZ host doesn't work

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    11k Views
    G

    Step 1:  Go to "Status" -> "DHCP leases" and setup a static DHCP lease for the desired host.

    Step 2:  Go to "Firewall" -> "Aliases" create a host type alias and give it a name [Host_alias_name], use the IP for the Static DHCP lease you created in Step 1.  Save.

    Step 3:  Go to "Firewall" -> "Aliases" create a port type alias and give it a name [Port_alias_name], for your port range enter "1:65535".  Save.

    Step 4:  Go to "Firewall" -> "NAT" on the port forward tab/card add a new NAT. Interface = WAN, External address = Interface address, Protocol = TCP/UDP, External port range = from: (other) in red box [Port_alias_name] to: (other), NAT IP = [Host_alias_name], Local port = (other) in red box [Port_alias_name], Auto-add a firewall rule to permit traffic through this NAT rule should be checked. Save.

    It should be working now!

    Note if your router requires any ports for any services it will not work because you have forwarded it all to the host.  You will need to modify your port type alias to exclude the desired port.  For example if your router needs port 1000 for a service in your port type alias you will need to create one range from 1 to 999 "1:999" and another range from 1001 to 65535 "1001:65535".

    ENJOY!

  • Not NAt inter IpAlias

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • How to setup a shared LAN using two routers?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    Is there a purpose behind having two routers back to back like that? If not then I'm sure I don't need to tell you the "easiest way" ;)

    If you must keep them separate I'd suggest replacing those two routers with one pfsense box with three interfaces, one WAN and two LAN. Traffic between the LAN segments will only flow based on what firewall rules you set (by default nothing gets through). Using the two routers like you are there is no way for the two LAN segments to see each other, they are for all intents and purposes two complete separate networks and those routers aren't designed to do what you want.

  • Translations of IP

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    If you remove natting and use only routing between firewalls.

    -* Not sure how this works, cause i haven't done this *-
    But it could be done via manual outbound nat and after creation of rule there is checkbox: do not nat or something similar

  • Acessing OpenVPN Clients from PPTP client

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    The PPTP clients are a part of the main site's subnet so the OpenVPN clients should be able to see them and vice versa. I currently have PPTP clients starting at 192.168.12.101 while the location is using 192.168.12.0/24. The OpenVPN clients have this route already but they cannot communicate. Any more ideas?

  • Need help Port Forwarding for game with pfSense 2.0 RC3

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    yes, I see the 57869 log entries, but what do I do with them.  They have a green box next to them, so does that mean it is getting through?  don't I need to address the side with all the red boxes?

    It got so bad that  couldn't play my game at all.  I just reset the pfsettings and I'm starting over from scratch once again.

    If anyone can point me to a very basic link I'd be grateful
    -=Mark=-

  • Outbound NAT - Newbie Question

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    4k Views
    S

    I did as you proposed:

    Automatic outbound NAT rule generation (IPsec passthrough) Manual Outbound NAT rule generation (Advanced Outbound NAT (AON)) then I deleted the additional rule which was added so I am at the state again as in the screenshot above

    But outgoing traffic is still on xxx.xxx.xxx.186 and not on the virtual IP.

    For 1.2.3 there isn't a snapshot available, right?

    Maybe I should mention that pfsense is running inside a KVM container with PromoxVE.
    Therefore I did a ngrep on the traffic on all interfaces of the physical hosts (physical IF and bridged IF). But outgoing traffic is always on xxx.xxx.xxx.186 on all interfaces. So pfsense seems not to try to assign the VIP.
    Incoming traffic on VIPs xxx.xxx.xxx.187-190 works nicely.

  • Multipal internal servers port forwarding

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.