If you create lots of queues and assign each host to a queue yes.

In my case, it's finally works by doing the following. Setup Traffic Shaper by the wizard, then goto Firewall: Shaper: Queues to setup the bandwidth for each queue. For example, given smaller maximum bandwidth to P2P traffic, then the Status: Traffic shaper: Queues can be load without problem. Thanks hoba! I know I have been asked many dump questions but your help is most appreciated! Aldo

@brizio: Ok, thanks but is it possible define a maximum bandwith that an user can utilize ? I mean in case I have a 2MB of bandwith on my Wan link I would like that an user can utilize a miximum of 1MB, is it possible ? Thanks This may be done by squid more simple: define a one connection speed less than maximum available for this acl. In this case is possible to make difference between http traffic types

Multiinterface shaing is not really working in 1.2 (search the forum) but it will be much much better in 1.3 (see the trafficshpaer thread in the bounty section). For now you could do something like this: wan upstream is upstream on wan interface lan downstream is downstream of ALL your wans This won't work perfect of course but it's the best that you can do in 1.2 currently, at least when working with only one pfSense. Other option would be to have an additional system inline on wan only doing shaping from wan to lan as workaround until 1.3 is available. ISP1-------wan/pfsense/lan-------wan          lan----- ISP2-----------------------------wan2 pfSense optx----- ISP2-----------------------------wan3        opty---                                 ...          ...

Doablo in 1.3. Search the forum.

I think this is a general problem with asymetrical links. I have a 16000/800 kbit/s ADSL2+ at home and if I download at full speed my upstream is almost full with ack packets only. If then other traffic comes on top it might see some drops. However 125 drops in 1 day 4 hours is really not much or better said almost nothing. I would simply just ignore it.

The answer has changed slightly. Search the forums. Doable in 1.3 or through the bounty system. It allows full shaping of ipsec tunnels inbound and outbound. Ermal

Yes, the only thing different between embedded/CD and full installation is the option to use additional packages with full installs. All basefeatures are included in the embedded version as well.

thanks Hoba, will try this

Good to hear  :)

As Scott said in some posts before ask your question in another thread. The answer to your question is a plain NO. Remember that this is just a recommendation and not suitable to every case. Ermal

I can tell FTP sucks. I spent an hour searching around these forums and mailing lists through Google and came up with the same conclusion. I was hoping maybe someone knew something new, oh well.. Thanks for the response. I'll keep my eyes open for 1.3.

Trafficshaping in pfSense happens always outbound at an interface. This means your WAN upstream is shaped outbound at WAN whereas the WAN downstream is shaped outbound at interface LAN.

http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2718.0.html

Search the forum. Shaping downstream of WAN actually happens upstream on WAN. Shaping is always applied outbound of an interface. That's why your opt1 downstream is falling into the queues at LAN as well. You should add the downstream of WAN and OPT1 as overall downstream and have as upstream the upstream speed of WAN. That works best for me using 3 wans at our office.

@hoba: No, as pfSense only sees encrypted traffic passing through it. It can't determine what's inside this encrypted packages and therefore it can't shape. You only could give higher or lower priority for all that vpn traffic with the shaper but not on different traffic inside the tunnel. thanks for the reply.. I think I dont really need to shape -within- the tunnel traffic, I just want to ensure outbound/inbound TCP traffic on port 1194 (what I use for openvpn stuff) to have a higher priority than bulk traffic.  whatever happens inside the tunnels pfsense doesnt need to know about in my case, i think.. so the traffic shaper should be able to help me somewhat

Yes, for embedded and yes for fitting your needs. Though the issue of configuring it still remains. Meaning there are 4 wizards till now in there but still do not feet everybody setups.

ok sullrich, thanks a lot! as I'm in Brazil, I dont know how can I contribute, but I'll check this, ok! I always used pfsense since 0.9x and pretend keep using it!!! Thanks a lot!