The GUI page runs that same command in a loop, it's not as "real time" as it might seem. There's no way I know of to sort that data at the moment.

I've follow this tutorial https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=63531.msg364520#msg364520 And now when I download from 2 differents PC they got each one half bandwidth, the same for more PC. Getting close to resolve the problem! Still can't figure out why the traffic shapping give the same speed even if one queue is 1% share and the other one 61%. PS: I've got the last build: 2.1.5-RELEASE (amd64) built on Mon Aug 25 07:44:45 EDT 2014 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p16

It was a fat finger error on the rule that catches qAck.  Everything works as advertised.

It's not "unfixable", it's just not easy to fix and has never worked so it got pushed off to a future release. As I stated in the linked bug report, there is no "quick solution". If there was, it'd be fixed in 2.2 already.

What happens if you disable your L7 rules?

maybe you could try to limit it based on ip addresses. Maybe this thread could help. I am also new to pfSense just trying to help. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=63531.0

Just to give an update on this… I am running pfSense 2.2 RC1, and it appears this is working now. I'm a happy camper.  :)

Thanks for the response.  I ended up actually just reinstalling since I was just getting started.  It might be nice to have in future versions a "reset to defaults" button for certain packages….like snort.  :)

I have a 50/50 connection and I had to up my queues to 2500 to avoid dropped packets because of micro-bursting. You may want to try something smaller, but give 200 a try and see if it makes a difference in your throughput.

There are diagrams in the 2.1 book.  I'm not exactly sure where floating rules come in. Here's one paste.  I am operating on the assumption that a floating rule on WAN out pushes the firewall rules on WAN back into the path and that's the proper order.  LAN rules, then floating on WAN out for outbound states.  

@KOM: No idea.  I don't use captive portal. Maybe i'm the only one to use captive portable with the traffic shapping. I'll continue my research. Thanks.

This post looks like it may have the information you're looking for. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=47856.0

If the other party has a slower connection, there is nothing you can do on your end, traffic shaping or not.

If all of your rules don't have a fixed upperbound, there should be a way to change the root to increase its upper limit. I'm not sure how, but there's bound to be a way.