• Outbound NAT using CARP IP

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    487 Views
    DerelictD
    Sounds like your ISP is not compatible with CARP. Some aren't. https://forum.netgate.com/topic/134297/cox-and-the-carp-mac/ https://forum.netgate.com/topic/146254/carp-outgoing-traffic-black-hole/
  • Downstream CARP upstream BGP

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    667 Views
    junicastJ
    Thank you for your response. We are going to use CARP. We will also build LAGGs for upstream and downstream links so the probability for failure should be pretty low. We thought about using BGP because our upstream devices can handle that and because it would mean less cabling / ports.
  • CARP outgoing traffic black hole

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    M
    Just FYI I got an answer to this, just not the one I wanted. See my response in https://forum.netgate.com/topic/134297/cox-and-the-carp-mac/17
  • COX and the CARP mac

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    3k Views
    DerelictD
    Yeah that's too bad. Thanks for pursuing it further and reporting back.
  • CARP/HA VMWARE ESXi 6.0.0 - Breaking HA after latest ESX patching ....

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    502 Views
    A
    @zimmy6996 said in CARP/HA VMWARE ESXi 6.0.0 - Breaking HA after latest ESX patching ....: Net.ReverseProsCheck Hey there Zimmy, i am setting up a similar setup within my vmware environment for HA, i have a couple questions for you. 1. where can i find the Net.ReverseProsCheck setting on my host? 2. on your secondary (slave) pfsense vm node did you configure all of the interfaces with an ip or only config the lan and carp interfaces. for example my primary pfsense has about 8 different networks: lan/wifi/wan/sonos/etc do i need to recreate all of these interfaces and set them with a static ip on the secondary box? Thank you in advanced any bit of guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
  • This topic is deleted!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    26 Views
  • Tricking a WAN Only Router

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    287 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    557 Views
    T
    Thanks for the insight. The other traffic on that physical interface will be negletible (only management data), so we will go for redundancy with VLAN.
  • VIPs not responding to clients

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    611 Views
    G
    OK, so I didn’t manage to work out what was specifically causing the problem. I was using a relatively old version of pfsense (2.3.3). I downloaded the latest version and redid the setup from scratch, and it just worked!
  • PfSense Vsphere redundancy LAN problem?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    268 Views
    No one has replied
  • Additionnal Subnet /29 over a PPPOE Connection

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    429 Views
    Y
    @Yathus said in Additionnal Subnet /29 over a PPPOE Connection: I tried with /32 one by one, not working too. Finally i re-add all IP from my block, one by one, /32 over Locahost interface and now i can ping ! Over WAN interface it's not working...
  • VIP on Azure

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    371 Views
    No one has replied
  • Initiate CARP failover via GW/Monitor IP status?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    241 Views
    No one has replied
  • loosing pings on VIP

    vip ping loss
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    593 Views
    B
    I captured on all interfaces (not only the one connected to ISP) and both firewalls. Only my firewalls advertised VHIDs. Could not spot any foreign MACs... Moreover beside VHID=3, also 5 caused the same issue.
  • Avoid auto failback to reduce VPN client interruptions

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    933 Views
    DerelictD
    If the advskew is 254 it is almost certainly in maintenance mode. The unit will not fail over unless it loses an interface on link down. It will not fail over on "OpenVPN service, VM or WAN failure." I am not sure what that means exactly.
  • Problem CARP

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    988 Views
    JeGrJ
    @Pavel88 You know that this Screenshot is about OPNsense, not pfSense and that you're probably in the wrong forums? Besides that, deleting any automatically created NAT rules and replacing them with "any" isn't recommended on either platform. Why did you remove them? It has a reason, why we differentiate localhost 127.0.0.1 and the LAN network when doing outbound NAT as @viragomann is absolutely right above. Without the right outbound NAT for 127.0.0.1 (-> has to be WAN address) there will be no internet on the standby node as it can't translate to your WAN VIP without being master.
  • carp preempt problem - only the fault interface vip switches

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    DerelictD
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/book/highavailability/example-redundant-configuration.html#setup-sync-interface
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • Port Forwarding not working with VIP (WAN)

    vip port forwarding
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    Closing this. Thanks for pointing me into the direction of testing the Ping on the CARP VIP. That ended up being the issue. Turns out somehow ISP took back one of our 3 IPs, we got them to put it back on our account and now we are back to normal. Can ping off that CARP VIP as well as port forwarding works now using the CARP VIP as Destination Address. Thanks again @Derelict
  • HA Configuration with Avahi

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    442 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.