Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. port forwarding
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • M

      NAT / Port Forward issue
      NAT • nat port forward port forwarding public ip • • mrdeckard

      14
      0
      Votes
      14
      Posts
      384
      Views

      M

      Hi @chpalmer,
      You were right; the problem was an incorrect gateway configuration on the webserver.

      Thanks again!

    • S

      Remote port forwarding
      NAT • port forwarding ssh • • samto

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      202
      Views

      S

      @samto I found a root cause of the problem. It is well described here: https://www.everythingcli.org/ssh-tunnelling-for-fun-and-profit-tunnel-options/

      So, the combination ssh -f -T -N -R works fine

    • R

      Port forwarding
      Français • port forwarding mikrotik pfsense nat • • rafefeh

      8
      0
      Votes
      8
      Posts
      180
      Views

      J

      Voila (quelques) infos ...

      On voit qu'il y a 2 machines qui doivent faire du NAT :

      le Microtik, situé ente 2 réseaux distincts, le pfsense , situé entre 2 réseaux distincts.

      Donc double NAT à réaliser, ou plutôt, 2 machines avec chacune son réglage de NAT (Port forward).

      Certains préfèrent un simple 'modem' (ou bridge) devant pfSense, ainsi pfSense a l'ip publique et il n'y a qu'un réglage de NAT à réaliser.

      Certaines Box ont une définition de 'dmz' : tout trafic internet en renvoyé (=Port forward) vers le WAN du pfSense, il ne reste que le réglage du pfSense.

    • M

      NATting with Manual Outbound NAT not working
      NAT • nat open vpn port forwarding • • mystic_sage

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      1686
      Views

      M

      You are 100% correct sir! That was the problem indeed, thanks for pointing that out!

    • S

      OpenVPN and Remote Access
      OpenVPN • openvpn firewall rules remote access port forwarding • • SteelCityColt

      10
      0
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      550
      Views

      E

      Which VPN service are you using? Almost all mainstream providers offer a split tunneling feature that allows you to choose which data to send through the VPN and which not. I use PureVPN but many others like ExpressVPN offer the same with their apps.

    • BogusException

      [Solved-Sort of] Client -> Server, but server has RFC1918 WAN address!
      OpenVPN • routing rfc1918 port forwarding • • BogusException

      12
      0
      Votes
      12
      Posts
      307
      Views

      dotdash

      @JKnott
      It is unusual, but it's the standard Comcast setup when you have a business account with static public IPs. For residential, or lower-tier business accounts, you get a dynamic public IP. I'm talking about v4, but they are now providing a static v6 block with the v4, and a residential user gets a dynamic /60.

    • mohkhalifa

      Port Forward in Active CP
      Captive Portal • captive portal firewall firewall rules port forward port forwarding • • mohkhalifa

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      240
      Views

      F

      @Gertjan shodan.io is a service that scans the internet for known exposure and for vulnerabilities

      i remember you are french, so I link you here a video in French on the subject https://youtu.be/SxjmOFBtsvk

    • D

      Port Forwarding not working with VIP (WAN)
      HA/CARP/VIPs • vip port forwarding • • Dixit

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      201
      Views

      D

      Closing this. Thanks for pointing me into the direction of testing the Ping on the CARP VIP. That ended up being the issue. Turns out somehow ISP took back one of our 3 IPs, we got them to put it back on our account and now we are back to normal. Can ping off that CARP VIP as well as port forwarding works now using the CARP VIP as Destination Address.

      Thanks again @Derelict