• 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    842 Views
    D
    @gertjan I feel a bit silly. I missed the step on assigning an address to LAN first. Thank you the detailed explanation. Lesson learned is do not attempt IPv6 when tired.
  • 0 Votes
    24 Posts
    6k Views
    JKnottJ
    @ddbnj Then I can only assume you didn't reboot pfsense. That's pretty much necessary to get the full sequence. Otherwise, you only get renewals.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    JKnottJ
    @spacey SLAAC is the normal way to configure IPv6. Look on Services > DHCPv6 Server & RA > LAN > Router Advertisements. If you have things configured correctly, a prefix will be automatically provided and the suffix is provided by the device.
  • IPv6 assigned through openvpn

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    692 Views
    JKnottJ
    @ofloo Sorry, I have never used TAP, but I can see problems in trying to bridge between networks.
  • Trouble configuring IPv6

    28
    0 Votes
    28 Posts
    3k Views
    JKnottJ
    @wineguy Yeah, using a sniffer is a good idea. When I had the problem with my ISP, I made a data tap with a managed switch.
  • Comcast IPv6 Problem: Works for 1-2 days, then stops

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    275 Views
    No one has replied
  • WAN DHCP6 gets addresses, but no connectivity

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    @tzvia said in WAN DHCP6 gets addresses, but no connectivity: @jackthesmack said in WAN DHCP6 gets addresses, but no connectivity: @tzvia said in WAN DHCP6 gets addresses, but no connectivity: @jackthesmack Do IPV6 IPs show in your INTERFACES on the dashboard now, because your post showing your INTERFACES only lists IPV4 addresses. No they don't, despite the IPv6 addresses showing in the Status / Interfaces page. In your screenshot I only see the link local and gateway which looks to be an FE80. I don't see an IPV6 address assigned, that's why I am asking. You would think that if your router was getting functional IPV6 from the ISP and was set correctly and was assigned, you would have IPs assigned from the ISP, not just a link local address. [image: 1619620561776-a9377e67-27bf-48f5-ab46-0a18e80ca677-image.png] Well this seems like an ISP issue now, because I plugged in my PC directly into the modem and now IPV6 doesn't work anymore. [image: 1619629974306-6735661e-e88a-408a-a8ab-d548b473e5b3-image.png] [image: 1619630056058-03291491-d272-465a-abe3-3935b888ecd4-image.png]
  • pFsense IPv6 gateways

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    400 Views
    No one has replied
  • [Solved] Unable to ping pfSense's LAN interface on IPv6

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    9k Views
    S
    @tomsparklabs said in [Solved] Unable to ping pfSense's LAN interface on IPv6: rebooted the router Hmm, thanks from the future...I set up an HE tunnel tonight and though the router could get out over IPv6, and PCs got IPv6 addresses, I found the PCs could not ping the router, dig to pfSense DNS over IPv6 to the LAN IPv6 was blocked by the default block firewall rule despite already having a LAN IPv6 to any rule, and new rules I added for DNS. Restarting pfSense (2.5.1) got IPv6 working fine from the PCs. Oddly https://test-ipv6.com/ worked...I guess over IPv4? But it showed IPv6 working, 10/10.
  • [solved] RA Subnets

    37
    0 Votes
    37 Posts
    6k Views
    JKnottJ
    @bob-dig I agree it should be easier to find. As for the name alias, that was even the case with IPv4, before there was IPv6. I assume it's because you have more than one address an interface can use, which is not typical. Also, with IPv6, you have not just mulitple addresses, you have multiple prefixes. Even if you don't have an alias, with SLAAC you can have up to 8 addresses, then there's link local too. By the time you've added a 2nd prefix, you're up to 17 addresses on a single interface.
  • IPv6 Router behind router

    68
    1 Votes
    68 Posts
    18k Views
    A
    I can use the IPV6 that are assigned on the USG DHCP to address computers from the internet. It just won't say "Internet" on Network and Sharing Center, or pass any IPv6 tests. Ping (as well as traceroutes) from local computers to google.com are fine even though it says "No Internet Access". The traceroutes go from the USG to the pfSense LAN IPv6 out to the internet, even though I have the link-local gateway address of Cox specified in the next-hop on the USG.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    574 Views
    lohphatL
    I found the problem. I had IPv6 enabled in pfBLocker-devel 3.0.16 DNSBL: IPv6 DNSBL Enable Enable DNSBL for IPv6 DNS Resolution filtering. Default IPv6 Webserver address [ ::10.10.10.1 ] and ports [80/443] radvd was choking on the ::10.10.10.1 RDNSS line of the config file.
  • Persistently Change RADVD AdvLinkMTU?

    ipv6 mtu 6rd
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    Just in case someone finds this hack useful, the following is the patch I used on 2.5.0. It will only do what is intended (hardcode advertised MTU to 1480) if "Use same settings as DHCPv6 server" is unchecked under the Router Advertisements configuration settings. src/etc/inc/services.inc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/etc/inc/services.inc b/src/etc/inc/services.inc index a3203aaaf7..1c63272ca1 100644 --- a/src/etc/inc/services.inc +++ b/src/etc/inc/services.inc @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ function services_radvd_configure($blacklist = array()) { $radvdconf .= "\tAdvDefaultLifetime {$dhcpv6ifconf['raadvdefaultlifetime']};\n"; } - $mtu = get_interface_mtu($realif); + /*$mtu = get_interface_mtu($realif);*/ + $mtu = 1480; if (is_numeric($mtu)) { $radvdconf .= "\tAdvLinkMTU {$mtu};\n"; } else {
  • IPv6 No Gateway after 2.5 upgrade

    97
    2 Votes
    97 Posts
    31k Views
    yon 0Y
    https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/11800
  • IPV6 ULA LAN to WAN ISP Public IPV4 internet possible?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    676 Views
    johnpozJ
    @starcodesystems said in IPV6 ULA LAN to WAN ISP Public IPV4 internet possible?: you have to know how to do these things Huh? Why would you need to know how do stuff that makes no sense to do? Do you have a use case example where anyone would want/need to do such a thing? Where it wouldn't make more sense to just give the device rfc1918 that you nat to your public IPv4..
  • IPv6 Tracking Interfaces Lose IPv6 Address

    21.02 ipv6
    27
    0 Votes
    27 Posts
    3k Views
    johnpozJ
    I don't think its really anything to do with the AP firmware.. So I don't think they will be able to fix it.. From what a few were saying has to do with the different auth that wpa3 uses.. Not sure - have not dug that deep into yet. I was really hoping to just have guest be limited to wpa3.. But I will live with this compromise.. Just thought give you a heads up if you were doing the same thing.. And you had friends come over - and you get hey this qr code thing isn't working ;)
  • Bug: cannot disable DHCPv6 Server

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    1k Views
    JKnottJ
    @gertjan Yep. He was one of my favourite things in that magazine. Incidentally, I have every paper issue of the magazine on my shelves here, going back to Vol 1, #1, Sept 1975. I bought the first three issues in person from the original publisher, Wayne Greene, at an amateur radio convention in Ottawa in 1975. He put the magazine in his wife's name for tax reasons. He then lost it when they divorced.
  • pfSense IPv6 RA RDNSS lifetime is too short (not compliant with RFC8106)

    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    Y
    @fabrizior I didn’t know it was a thing :) Thanks for the information.
  • 0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    DerelictD
    @jknott I didn't say reboot. I said save WAN again. Your workflow might be triggering a dhcp6c refresh, but, in general, when you make changes to inside interfaces set to "track interface" you have to save WAN again to pick them up. The dhcp6c client is the mechanism that sets all of the interface addresses. That happens when dhcp6c receives the PD. That happens on WAN. pfSense itself does not do any of that work.
  • 2.5.1-RC IPv6 still bugged with Multi WAN

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    506 Views
    MikeV7896M
    Since this is the forum for IPv6 and not the forum for the Development 2.5.1-RC snapshots, you may want to re-post this over there, where the developers would be more likely to see it. https://forum.netgate.com/category/83/21-02-2-2-5-1-snapshots
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.