Mmm … Fortunately somebody more informed than me pointed that out. Thanks for that ;)
Well then ... that pfsense box will only do routing / firewalling / NAT / VPN / ... not backups. I have a dedicated machine that does backups, another one which will handle media, etc
Glad to hear that ... And I think it wouldn't changed much in my bills either, because I had another E-30 (an MSI) which has a single x16 slot and probably has the same problem. Therefore the microATX case I chose (FRACTAL DESIGN ARC MINI, rather nice I think) seems to be a good choice.
If it is as you pointed out then I'll limit myself to doing only failover and leave link aggregation on the "client" machines and switches.
I think you're right since one user in another forum pointed that out as well ... but as I said to him I think something's odd, because with a 100BaseT router (Zyxel) and everything else gigabit ethernet (1000Mbps) I couldn't get transfers above 12MB/s (instead of the theoricals 125MB/s). Will have to test that out again with this setup.
In that case I'll just use 3 interfaces as failover plus one WAN interface OR 2xWAN failovers and 2xWAN failovers connected to an average switch (definitively not a procurve).
As a side note, do you know why the HP Procurves 1810-[8/24]g switches I bought costs a lot less than the 1800-[8/24]g ? Both support link aggregation and the 1810-* seems more energy efficient. Do you know anything about it ?
Last but not least now the problem got reversed: I can perfectly access the WAN but couldn't get access to the web configurator but I can ping the LAN interface of the Pfsense box. This is so screwed up … could it be the OPT interfaces I enabled (though with different ip addresses) ?
Many many thanks stephenw10 ;). Today you really helped me getting started with this router !