Probably.

It's not ideal though. Intel NICs are better supported in general. Raid controllers can be an issue, it's almost always better to disable them and use a ZFS mirror instead if you need raid.
The graphics hardware should be irrelevant.
It's probably massively overpowered for a firewall!

If it supports FreeBSD pfSense will run there. I don't see that listed but it's probably just untested.

Steve

I bought a usb to ethernet adapter (two actually) set it to a simple static IP like 192.168.1. 40/24. Pfsense couldn't ping my connected laptop (192.168.1.41/24) and my laptop couldn't ping pfsense. Verified cables were good, both devices could ping THEMSELVES, even switched usb to ethernet adapters and verified mac addresses were seen using arp -a. But, still no pings.

So, from the menu i did a reset. And reconfigured pfsense to be the DHCP server and use the usb to ethernet adapter interface. BINGO, i can ping back and forth. I can also access the gui!

Over first hurdle, now find out how to upgrade to Plus.

Thank you for your help guys/gals.

First check the system logs for watchdog timeouts from the Realtek driver.

If you do see those you can try the alternative re(4) driver.

Steve

Had you connected to the console before?

What do you see when you try to connect to the console?

You're going to need a functioning serial console connection to either recover it or to reinstall clean.

Steve

Yup, you could certainly do that. Though I would personally choose any other hypervisor.

But I would test FreeBSD 14 on it bare metal if you can. If it throws the same panic there we can open an upstream bug for it.

Steve

Yes, only the x550 supports N-baseT like that.

@stephenw10 Thanks for the info. I only have a low profile expansion slot available on my pfSense box. I found a low profile bracket on the popular online auction site and got it for a few bucks, then I can try it once it comes in the mail. FWIW Amazon lists it as a currently available product priced at $676 (!) so there might be support for it.

Make sure the IP it's giving you is not conflicting with any other subnet on the firewall.

@mercer2 Super cool router that you bought. That is absolutely my dream router. Hows it been treating you? Did you get the speeds you were expecting?

It's only for a SIM card.

Those are not errors or even warnings. Those are messages from the boot log showing the timecounter hardware being detected/initialised:

Nov 10 10:41:17 kernel Timecounter "ARM MPCore Timecounter" frequency 12500000 Hz quality 1000 Nov 10 10:41:17 kernel Event timer "ARM MPCore Eventtimer" frequency 12500000 Hz quality 1000

Both the 1100 and 2100 show that as they share the same SoC.

Steve

Mmm, that does seem suspicious. I would normally expect a higher result when testing from a client behind the firewall. Unless that client itself is restricted.

You can see that in both cases no single core is maxed out. But when testing from the firewall directly the load created by iperf itself is larger than anything else.

@brad73435 said in Hardware upgrade question.:

can I use the saved configuration from the old system?

Yes. You can usually import the config and simply re-assign the interfaces but we can also convert the config for you to import directly if it's something more complex.

Steve

It didn't want to identify in my server so it got pulled and will try it in my desktop instead.

Does it actually fail to boot or does it just not show anything at the console?

What's confusing it is the EFI console for some reason. If you installed legacy it would probably boot fine.

It could be come conflict between the serial console and console redirect to the port. Hard to imagine what might have changed there though that wasn't at an upgrade.

@stephenw10 Did not see any jumpers close to where the 4 intpah interfaces are but this might take a while to get it working.

If you want to actually route 10Gbps, yes. I'd expect that CPU to reach something in the 3-4Gbps range. Perhaps that's enough for the times you need to connect between VLANs.

@stephenw10
Thank you very much.
I'll give it a try and let you know.

Just wanted to add some additional information here.

I just did a reinstall on this box to take it to CE 2.7 from plus. During the installation I chose GPT (bios) as the partition type and can confirm that it boots without issue. I think my first install may have been MBR mode.

@stephenw10

All interesting stuff. 👍

☕️