• pfSense 2.4.3 / pfBlockerNG 2.1.2_2 -> _5 update kills pfSense

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    I am so looking forward to the new version. the dev version is excellent :)
  • pfBlockerNG Devel 2.2.1 upgrade fails to start pfb_dnsbl service

    31
    0 Votes
    31 Posts
    5k Views
    M
    So it looks like the openvpn range had the range it was last configured for, but not some of the others that had failed. [2.4.3-RELEASE][root@pfsense.home]/root: ifconfig | grep inet inet6 fe80::224:b2ff:fedf:a196%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 73.82.108.146 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 inet6 fe80::2e0:66ff:fe6a:c58f%bge1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 10.10.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255 inet 10.254.254.254 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.254.254.254 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 inet6 fe80::2e0:66ff:fe6a:c58f%bge1.2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 inet 10.1.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.0.255 inet6 fe80::2e0:66ff:fe6a:c58f%bge1.5 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet 10.2.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.2.0.255 inet6 fe80::224:b2ff:fedf:a196%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet 10.2.10.1 --> 10.2.10.2 netmask 0xffffffff inet6 fe80::224:b2ff:fedf:a196%ovpns2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa inet 10.1.10.1 --> 10.1.10.2 netmask 0xffffffff I think that my choice works out fine though, 10.254.254.254 is way out of the way.
  • Difference between pfblockerng and pflockerng -devel

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    RonpfSR
    @labradorg13 https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/8lnugz/pfblockerng_devel_version_released/
  • 2.4.4 pfsense 'vip' error

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    427 Views
    RonpfSR
    https://forum.netgate.com/topic/132669/pfblockerng-generating-php-errors/5
  • DisconnectAds, DisconnectTracking and DNSBL_Malicious - D_Me_Malw

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    QinnQ
    @ronpfs said in DisconnectAds, DisconnectTracking and DNSBL_Malicious - D_Me_Malw: host -t A s3.amazonaws.com Thanks Ronpfs it did the trick host -t A s3.amazonaws.com s3.amazonaws.com is an alias for s3-1.amazonaws.com. s3-1.amazonaws.com has address 54.231.33.202 Did not new the command dig (domain information groper) thanks
  • pfBlockerNG upgrade 2.1.2_3 to 2.1.4_8?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    696 Views
    M
    I've upgraded 2.1.2_3 to 2.1.4_8 without issue.
  • Firewall Maximum Table Entries

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    501 Views
    pttP
    https://forum.netgate.com/post/780328
  • PHP Error after upgrade (SOLVED)

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    Fixit: # pkg-static search icu icu-60.2_1,1 International Components for Unicode (from IBM) # pkg-static install -yf icu-60.2_1,1 # ln -s /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.60 /usr/local/lib/php/20131226/libicui18n.so.60 Restart php-fpm
  • which list is blocking?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    590 Views
    BBcan177B
    Everything that is blocked is visible in the "Alerts Tab".
  • Blocking on non-selected interface?

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    @ronpfs OK back up now, thanks..
  • pfblocker_devel

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    814 Views
    A
    @grimson said in pfblocker_devel: You do know/understand that installed packages no longer show as an available package, as they are installed already? lol yes, I was just wondering if the new version had the same stuff as the devel version. It sort popped up out of the blue in the package list while I already had pfblocker installed so / I went and installed the pfblocker_devel version. Maybe I was the only one who saw it. The pfblocker_devel version I'm using now is excellent with all new feeds. Now when I look at the package list I see the new version of pfblocker. I'm thinking its time to fully uninstall the pfblocker_devel and go back to the pfblocker on the package list now lol Looks like I'm the only one with the pfblocker_devel lol Good to see Mr BBcan177 is back welcome home mate :) cheers guys
  • pfBlocker DNSBL blocking and config with two pfBlocker instances

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    900 Views
    B
    With a little more troubleshooting I found the issue. I neglected adding in a firewall rule to allow the client access to the DNSBL VIP over ports 443 and 80.
  • pfBlockerNG-devel: 2.2.5_9 install error

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    533 Views
    QinnQ
    Thanks for pointing that one out to me. I missed it, because I read this one, https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/8lnugz/pfblockerng_devel_version_released/ ,which suggests it was only downloadable from the unstable branch, as I did not expect a development release in the stable branch...
  • Pfblocker blocking vudu video streaming service

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    675 Views
    BBcan177B
    @bmcdonald1778 Anything that is blocked will be visible in the Alerts Tab and can be whitelisted/suppressed.
  • Piracy/Streaming Blocklist

    piracy streaming blacklist
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    703 Views
    No one has replied
  • How to only allow a few domains?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    299 Views
    No one has replied
  • Lists not updating

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    @ronpfs worked, thanks
  • Update lists fail

    34
    0 Votes
    34 Posts
    5k Views
    QinnQ
    @bbcan177 said in Update lists fail: @qinn said in Update lists fail: btw From what I've read, when I want to move over to the latest dev of pfblockerNG I have to first deinstall pfblockerNG and then install the dev version and all settings will be restored, is this the right way to move over to the dev version? Yes I would just go to devel and see if that fixes your issue.... There are a ton of new features in devel.... https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/8lnugz/pfblockerng_devel_version_released/ Also install the "Cron" package for pfSense and you can see the pfSense Cron tasks from there. Thanks for your advise hoping for a release soon, I don't care about an ETA, take your time and keep up the good work.
  • I should have grabbed a screenshot!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    315 Views
    No one has replied
  • pfBLockerNG 2.2 DEV and 2.4.4 dev hardlocking pfsense

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    460 Views
    D
    Did as instructed. Will report back results.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.