Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. solved
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • R

      [SOLVED] Wireless station (client) acquires unexpected IP address (DHCP)
      L2/Switching/VLANs • solved • • regexaurus

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      269
      Views

      R

      I don't know why a testing device acquired an IP address for the Guests VLAN while connected to a wireless network associated with the IOT VLAN. I tweaked subnet/VLAN settings a little, but still very similar to the settings as described above. The testing device now acquires an IP address in the expected subnet, when connected to the IOT wireless network, so I guess that problem is resolved...
      Even after the device acquired an IP address in the expected subnet, it still had no Internet access. After adjusting outbound NAT, this too was resolved.

    • C

      My Netgate 2100 WAN port is not a Gigabit Ethernet WAN, why? [solved]
      Official Netgate® Hardware • solved • • chunman

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      599
      Views

      C

      Finally my problem is solved by just changing my lan cable from wan port 1 to port 2 at the ISP modem side! The speedtest reaches over 700Mbps.
      alt text

      @bingo600 thank you so much for your reply giving me direction to solve the problem.

    • R

      [SOLVED] Can't ping IP in virtual IP subnet, from other subnet on different interface
      General pfSense Questions • solved • • regexaurus

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      132
      Views

      R

      @viragomann That triggered something in this tired brain. :)
      I want to access and reconfigure the device (I'm not it's original admin) with IP 10.0.5.251 for a different subnet. The device is statically configured and from a previous packet capture, it appeared that it is configured for a default gateway of 10.0.5.1. After changing the virtual IP to 10.0.5.1, I can ping/access the device.
      Thank you!

    • S

      [solved] IPSec Widget not showing correct number of tunnels
      webGUI • solved • • SophiaMarchildon

      2
      0
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      334
      Views

      jimp

      It's a known issue and fixed on 2.6.0/21.09 snapshots

    • P

      [solved] OpenVPN Client Interface not triggering rules and pass
      Firewalling • solved • • papounetgate

      9
      0
      Votes
      9
      Posts
      282
      Views

      P

      @stephenw10 Thank you very much Steve for the info, I will take it in account.

    • O

      [Solved] SG-3100 Switch Configuration - LAN on VLAN ID1?
      Official Netgate® Hardware • sg-3100 switchports switch vlan solved • • omid_1985

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      296
      Views

      stephenw10

      You can only choose a switch port on one interface as you found. If you leave unset it will use the actual VLAN status which takes it's state from the parent interface. In this case though that's the in internal port which is always UP.

      No, there's no private VLAN type function. That would need to be on a switch where hosts are connected directly.

      Steve

    • S

      Windows 2019 DHCP stops serving IPs to LAN clients when OpenVPN site-to-site is on. [solved]
      DHCP and DNS • solved • • SuperVertrix

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      1323
      Views

      S

      @teamits

      Thank you, Steve, you somewhat pointed me in the right direction.
      The location of the events are located here:
      Applications and Services Logs > Microsoft > Windows > DHCP-Server

      I checked and I couldn't find the culprit, but there's a DHCP server log file here:
      %windir%\System32\Dhcp

      The log file revealed the following error while a client was asking for an IP and the OpenVPN tunnel was on:
      "Packet dropped because of Client ID hash has mismatch or standby server"

      Upon further search, it turns out that the Active Directory DHCP server on Site A was trying to contact an AD DHCP server on Site B that once was part of the AD Domain of Site A, but since was removed from, but some more cleanup was necessary on AD Site A to make it stop trying to contact that orphaned AD Domain Controller. The issue has been resolved, all clients are able to obtain IP #'s from Site A.

      Thanks so much for the hint.

      Stay safe my friends.

      SuperVertrix.

    • A

      [SOLVED] PIA OpenVPN Port Forward [SOLVED]
      OpenVPN • solved • • Apsis-IM

      12
      0
      Votes
      12
      Posts
      4007
      Views

      M

      @apsis-im You are welcome, enjoy :)

    • Herman

      google.com keeps asking: Before you continue - Google uses cookies and other data... [Solved]
      pfBlockerNG • solved • • Herman

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      366
      Views

      johnpoz

      @herman

      You should be able to edit the thread title and tag - if not I can do it for you.

      Thread marked.

    • M

      Weird asymetric routing issue [solved]
      Routing and Multi WAN • solved • • Myster_fr

      18
      0
      Votes
      18
      Posts
      162
      Views

      M

      @viragomann Awesome, thanks again !

    • M

      [SOLVED]
      OpenVPN • solved • • mdrapeau

      1
      0
      Votes
      1
      Posts
      51
      Views

      No one has replied

    • T

      [SOLVED] Access VPN Clients from WAN interface
      OpenVPN • solved • • TyStosic

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      296
      Views

      T

      Hi @johnpoz

      I have NAT enabled on both pfSense firewalls, however as a test I disabled NAT to ensure all natting was handled by the Cisco router and I was still unable to reach the 10.0.20.10 client.

      RFC1918 blocking is disabled on all the pfSense interfaces.

      I can access all clients on the LAN network of the pfSense LAB with NAT enabled. I also have a static route on the Cisco router for 10.0.15.0/24 via 10.0.50.10 and I can access any host on that network with no issues.

      After some more playing around today I got it working.
      Firstly I had to assignin the ovpns1 interface and enable it under the Interfaces > Interface Assignments.
      Then I was required to add the 10.0.100.0/24 network into the “IPv4 Local network(s)” under the OpenVPN Tunnel Settings, however this setting wouldn't apply until a reboot of the pfSense.

      Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.

      Tyler

    • R

      [Solved] where are the release notes for daily snapshots?
      Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion • solved • • ragnar00

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      99
      Views

      jimp

      Look at Redmine, and the Github repos (on the RELENG_2_4_5 branches) and see what's there.

      The snapshots are automated and on a timer. There will not be a per-snapshot set of release notes.

    • B

      Dynamic DNS vs Static IP
      Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion • dynamic dns dynamic wan ip static ip solved • • BloodyBonkers

      11
      0
      Votes
      11
      Posts
      2240
      Views

      N

      The address does not change. Most devices use dynamic IP addresses, which are assigned by the network when they connect and change over time.

    • R

      (SOLVED) vnstatd Status Traffic Totals data collection daemon not loading
      Development • solved • • ragnar00

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      770
      Views

      hugoeyng

      @ragnar00 Thank you. I found it.

    • currentUsername

      staff account without ticket #solved
      Captive Portal • solved • • currentUsername

      17
      0
      Votes
      17
      Posts
      223
      Views

      johnpoz

      If its yours - I might steal it, I like it a lot ;)

      But it would sound better if said in French I think ;) Love to use it on a call when dealing with some of my French speaking colleagues ;)

    • G

      Port forward to an address behind another router
      NAT • solved • • geokef

      10
      0
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      1004
      Views

      G

      @johnpoz
      You are 100% correct.
      pfSense can port forward at any subnet behind other routers as NAT and Routing tables are correct. The problem was on my ISP and the new Public IP he gave me which was blocked in inbound traffic. SOLVED. Thanks a lot for your time.

    • pfSenseTest

      Package Manager Not Updating [Solved]
      Installation and Upgrades • package manager update solved • • pfSenseTest

      16
      0
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      7153
      Views

      stephenw10

      Cool, thanks for confirming. 👍

    • N

      Cannot Ping Across VLANS
      L2/Switching/VLANs • solved • • NicP91

      6
      0
      Votes
      6
      Posts
      2669
      Views

      N

      @Gertjan I figured out it was a firewall issue within Windows just in time! That was my next step though :) Thank you for your offer of assistance! - Nic.

    • K

      [solved] second LAN-interface not working correctly
      Installation and Upgrades • solved • • karls0

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      547
      Views

      K

      Thank you for your time Derelic. I looked at the interfce settings and found out, that I had left the subnet-setting for the interface at /32 instead of changing it to /24.
      Maybe this setting is bit confusing, because if I should set a single IP-address for the router interface and not a subnet. I suggest giving this setting a separate line or at least a caption "subnet size" or something similar.
      Anyway - excuse my dumbness.
      Best, Karl

    • G

      [Solved] OpenVPN One Client ... can't get it to go
      OpenVPN • openvpn gateway montoring routing solved • • Grimm Spector

      21
      0
      Votes
      21
      Posts
      2817
      Views

      T

      @grimm-spector Exactly, it will work just fine :)