Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    J
    @qupfer What did I bang my head over this strange 502 issue. Your solution did it! Thank you so much, even 2.5 years later!
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    @NRgia said in Suricata on Pfsense: @bmeeks Thank you for what you did for Snort or Suricata. I'm not sure what you want me to do on Redmine, due to is a bug tracker. My question is for Product Management, which I will ask it here to be public: What is the plan for these 2 packages, Suricata and Snort? Thank you Yes, Redmine is for both bug reports and feature requests. Asking for the Suricata binary to be updated to the latest 7.0.11 version from upstream is a legitimate Redmine request. I would suggest simply asking for the binary version update instead of asking about future Netgate strategy (such as the support plans for the packages). Strategy discussions typically don't get very far because they deal with proprietary information or plans that a company may not want to publicly discuss. Redmine is where the Netgate developer team tracks all the code changes they make for pfSense. They will see Redmine reports much quicker than a forum post.
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    571 Topics
    3k Posts
    dennypageD
    @Leon-Straathof Data retention settings are handled inside of ntopng. Documentation here. Pay attention to the RRD note. Also, if you've turned on some of the slice and dice time series information (is off by default), I'd suggest turning them back off. These balloon the storage requirements and are of little actual use.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    fireodoF
    @tinfoilmatt said in Failed or invalid Mime Type: [application/SIMH-tape-data|0]: (ASN data is IPinfo, not Maxmind) Thats correct but "GeoLite2-Country" is from Maxmind ... (that confused me) I'm considering simply adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list to test. Thats what i tought too ... I'll try when I have the time for it ... Edit: I can confirm - adding "application/SIMH-tape-data" to the list at line 257 in /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc did the trick - no more error! Edit: OK, problem resolved but I would like to know, whats the cause for that error! (SIMH-tape-data sounds like a "blast from the past" ...) Thanks a lot!
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    496 Topics
    3k Posts
    tinfoilmattT
    @jimp True! Thanks for confirming. (How's that trademark registration coming along, btw? Gotta be gettin' close to "" this far down the road now! )
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    294 Topics
    1k Posts
    yon 0Y
    said in Please update frr on Pfsense+ to FRR 10.3: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15785 now frr 10.4.1
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    90 Topics
    598 Posts
    E
    Updated CE 2.7.2 to 1.86.4 Changelog pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:amd64/latest/All/tailscale-1.86.4.pkg Freshports
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    694 Topics
    4k Posts
    H
    I have Wireguard installed on my firewalls. I have about 12 firewalls and most of them connect back to the main firewall which allows the connection to the servers in the main building. I setup a tunnel on each and then added each location as a peer on the Main firewall. This seemed to work except that the gateway. unde3r Monitor IP it only allows one IP address. So the first one works and shows connected fine, but the other 2 are red and do not connect. Everything seems to work until I added a 3rd peer and then the 1st peer showed as if it was offline even though it looked fine and I was able to connect to devices on that network. Am I supposed to add multiple gateways to the Main firewall so that shows as up? Is this the right way for the tunnels between the buildings which need access will work - By adding a tunnel at that location and just adding a peer to the main location?
  • Squid, clamAV config file

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    PippinP
    Yes, here same: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115323.0
  • Installing node.js on pfsense? Pkg_add unknown command?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ
    That isn't a package we include in our repositories. There are ways to install FreeBSD packages, though it's not something we recommend unless you are well versed in FreeBSD and are able to deal with the potential side effects. If you search the forum for threads about installing FreeBSD packages on 2.3, you'll find all the detail you need.
  • Filer package? (or any way to store custom scripts in xml)

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    868 Views
    B
    Here is a similar discussion: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=115344.0
  • MOVED: Squid3 local authentication not authenticating

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    596 Views
    No one has replied
  • UPS for NUT to turn off pfSense?

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    K
    Thanks for the reply, I will post back when i got NUT working with the appropriate APC for it to turn off pfSense when the lights go out :)
  • NUT snmp-ups failed to start

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    dennypageD
    The first one is easy: the ups name cannot have spaces in it, so "APC SRT 8000" is an invalid ups name and will be ignored. The second one not so much. "SNMP-UPS" is a valid ups name. I tested the ups.conf posted against NUT 2.7.4 and do not receive the "no UPS definitions found in ups.conf" error.
  • NUT 2.7.4 missing dependencies?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    Thank you denny.  I saw that thread but was not clear how long it would be before it arrived. I used System / Package Manager / Available Packages, but it seems to be missing the NUT 2.7.4 dependency altogther.  I tried reinstalling, but got nowhere.  I keep getting this error msg … ERROR: NUT is enabled, however the service is not running! The SNMP UPS may be unreachable. I have tried starting it but it just keeps throwing up the same error.  I am trying to monitor an APC ups with an NMC2 card.  It is quite possible I have misconfigured something at either end, as I am in very virgin territory for me with this.  I will just remove it for now and wait for the new verision.  Good luck with it.  Thank you.
  • Syslog-NG on 2.3.2 Configuration format is invalid. Service wont start.

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    P
    Sorry.  Duplicate of https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=95224.0
  • Problems with LCDProc

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    D
    I have LCDproc running on a Watchguard x750e with pfSense 2.3.1p5 For this version of pfSense to get the LCDproc up and running,is the same way as for 2.3 as described here : https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=44034.msg609820#msg609820 Only difference, for Watchguard x550e , x750e and x1250e models You must use the 32Bit version of these packages : http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:32/release_3/All/freetype2-2.6.2.txz http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:10:x86:32/release_3/All/lcdproc-0.5.7_2.txz Grtz DeLorean
  • Starting vmware tools on boot?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    Just install the package , it will add everything
  • APCupsd package status for pfSense

    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    11k Views
    dennypageD
    The new NUT package is available for testing if you are interested: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=114871.0
  • Radius for Cisco logout action log.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    518 Views
    No one has replied
  • Zabbix_proxy_lts not starting

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    814 Views
    G
    Thats not realy good. is there a way to realy complete remove the package, including the database. Because after removing the package and reinstalling it, all parameters are still there. Are there any logfiles, where i can find infos, why the service isn`t starting. Any hints? Guido
  • Zabbix proxy version 3.0

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    5k Views
    A
    A +1 for me… we have a lot of pfSense around which are preventing us to upgrade ZABBIX server! It seems there is a new package under development (https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=106181.0), but no more news since May 13. TIA to anyone who can give us some fresh news on this topic.
  • TLS + radius.conf

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    X
    @peridian: So I commented them out, and behold, it worked.  Upon reboot, the comments were removed, so you actually have to edit the freeradius.inc file to ensure the comments get re-applied each time. Clearly the author had some notion of this, as he has notes on the GUI saying to leave the options at "None", however the freeradius.inc script still includes the above lines in the .conf output whether you have set them to "None" or not.  This is probably a bug. Sorry for revive this thread but this bug already exist… Any chance to get a fix? Thanks for your work.
  • Video Codecs on Pfsense Asterisk

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    576 Views
    No one has replied
  • Missing AWS regions in the aws-wizard package

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    833 Views
    C
    Thanks, I opened a ticket in our internal bug tracker to get that addressed.
  • Is Squids ClamAV HTTPS scanning broken?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    3k Views
    N
    Hi, in my C-ICAP logs I found something like this for every of the 8 files: Virus redirection: http://pfSense.oberndorf.ca/squid_clwarn.php?url=https://secure.eicar.org/eicarcom2.zip&source=192.168.10.10&user=-&virus=stream: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND. So you probably have to make sure that: 1.) your pfsense is reachable via http on port 80 to show you the redirect page - or you configure something else in Antivirus 2.) Antivirus is not scanning cached content again by default. ClamAV assumes, that all files in the squid cache were scanned in the past and are clean. So if you opended the eicar files in the past they went into the squid cache and will never be scanned again and so clamav will never kick in. 3.) Of course you need to install the CA certificate on every client machine if you do HTTPS / SSL INTERCEPTION. 4.) I only tested this with pfsense using HTTP on port 80. Not with https and not with custom ports. 5.) If http and https is going through squid and you can see it in "Real Time" tab in squid, then your squid config is OK. Then you need to make sure Antivirus is running. 6.) Update Antivirus Database an make sure it updated successfull in the "real Time" tab, too. Without that it will probably not work. Instead of wasting my time making a guide it could be more helpful that you post your squid config, antivirus config with screenshots and post your clients browser proxy config and proxy.pac file. Best would be with screenshots. Posting the relevant firewall rules for one interface. Regards
  • FreeRADIUS package or standalone

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    801 Views
    N
    Hi, the pfsense freeradius packe is based on the lastest 2.2.9 version. This version will not get any feature improvements anymore, only security updates. This is what freeradius.org is saying. Further the freeradius2 package on pfsense or better the WebUI was built to do some of the freeradius work via the WebUI. Of course there are much more functions you can do via the plain config files. So you should probably have to decide: Are the features on the pfsense freeradius2 package are enough for your needs? Are you able to configure everything on the WebUI you need? If this is the fact you should have no problem with the pfsense package. BUT if you need features which are not in the WebUI or you have to do much configuration changes on the config files of pfsense's freeradius the you probably can do tzhe same work on a VM running the very latest freeradius3. Hint: Because there are so many configuration changes between freeradius2 and freeradius3 it would take much time to develope a new freeradius package. I think this is the main reason why nobody is doing the work on this package and as long as it is supported ans gets new security fixes it will do its job.
  • Create new entries for blacklist

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    472 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.