• Ping goes nuts with shaper enabled

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    D

    Add a rule to shape ICMP traffic and send it to the highest priority queue.

  • PfSense 2.0 RC1 VoIP LAN, Data LAN, single WAN

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    B

    So I have looked into this a bit more, and read up on ALTQ etc. I understand now a bit more about how it works, and why you can only shape traffic the leaves an interface (because if you think about it once the traffic has entered the interface its already there and used up the bandwith).

    What I would like to know though is if I have multiple VLANs assigned to the same physical interface, can I think add a queue to that interface and shape all the traffic across the multiple VLANs?

    Regards

    Ben

  • Need a way to block or at least limit torrent traffic

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    B

    diagnostics > backup/restore, remove the ".txt" of the file name before upload to the firewall

    i also recomend to update pfsense to the lastest version

  • VOIP QOS

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    5k Views
    D

    Just noticed this relatively old thread - is the OP still affected/interested?

  • 2.0 using Differentiated services codepoint that is not in the pulldown?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ

    There isn't a mechanism to do custom fields there. If you open a ticket at http://redmine.pfsense.org and explain this there, it can probably be added.

    If you want to test it first, you can edit usr/local/www/guiconfig.inc and add it to the array $firewall_rules_dscp_types there.

  • Bandwidth limit for each IP/Host on Pfsense 2.0 with Bridged Interface

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    12k Views
    J

    Hi,

    I think you should use floating rules for this.

    They apply before interface specific rules.

    Regards,

    Joel.

  • Queue upload bandwidth from a single IP for shaping and lower priority

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Simple Traffic Shaping for VOIP

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    Don't bother trying to shape the inbound voip traffic - you have no real control over that.  Try to set a reasonable guess for the uplink speed and prioritize the voice traffic…

  • How can I limit WAN bandwidth?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    9k Views
    jimpJ

    I haven't tried this in 2.0, but on 1.2.3 all you had to do was run through the wizard and set the WAN interface bandwidth to the limit you want, say 60Mbit, and then activate at least one other shaper action (like prioritizing DNS), and then the queues and rules that were made would accomplish that limiting.

    You could use a limiter on 2.0 to do that, but you'd have to make sure that all of your traffic in and out of WAN was run through that limiter. Probably with a floating rule on WAN would be easiest.

  • Basci rules/setup for VoIP shaping in 2.0 RC1 (Best approah)

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    I with you on this one…I'm confused with how to setup. I've tried a few things and have run into trouble...

    I'm running a fiber connection with 15Mbps is both directions. I want to guarantee 100 kbps UP/DOWN to my VoIP device but cannot seem to figure it out. I've used the new wizards but it appears to setup only in one direction. Also, for me, it appears that once I use the wizard the default queue is already maxed without moving any traffic...

    I'm running 2.0RC1.

    It appears that the wizard doesn't QoS in both directions. Is there a reason for this?

    Hopefully someone will point us in the right direction...

  • MOVED: Layer 7 traffic shaping in pFsense 2.0 Beta 4

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic Shaping Voip Inside OpenVPN Tunnel

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Mutiple delay pools

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Shaping traffic to pfsense itself

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    C

    I'm running 2.0 and I was able to prioritize the whole tunnel and shape traffic within the tunnel. Its still a work-in-progress but it can be done with 2.0… I did have to assign interfaces for the OpenVPN tunnels.

    Its been a while but i thought it if you assign interfaces to your OpenVPN tunnels within 1.2.3, you can prioritize the whole tunnel. But I can be wrong, been a while since I worked on 1.2.3

  • Simple bandwidth cap

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    J

    yes  he's right, you need to pick one other thing in the wizard,  like prioritize your outbound DNS.  that will be enough for the wizard to complete and is not a bad idea to have set anyway.

  • Traffic Shaping in 2.0RC (x86) and uTorrent with a NAT port forward

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    Z

    i set it up manually and it seems to work well now.  set the default as lowest and all my torrents are going there, and elevated priority through the floating rules for services i use (ie html, pop3, etc)

    anyone looking for a read on traffic shaping should give this a go, helped me alot:

    https://calomel.org/pf_hfsc.html

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ

    You might have better luck on 2.0 using limiters (pipes) with hard limits, and direct the traffic into them instead of traditional shaper queues.

  • Why is all my traffic hitting the qVOIPUp queue?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    jimpJ

    2.0 is taking quite a bit longer than anyone expected, but we won't bind a cycle to a given date just for the sake of releasing it. It'll be ready when it's ready. :-)

    Hopefully the cycle will be much shorter for 2.1, but 2.0 is very ambitious, so much was added and changed it's taking quite a while to shake out all the bugs.

  • Traffic shaping worth it for home network?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    A

    On my 1.2.3 pf system I run the shaper wizard and selected a few games from the list for higher priority then changed the mapped ports and names to the ports I actually wanted to use.
    This seems to work fine. Teamspeak Witch is already in the wizard (I host a server) and I Host an Urban Terror server . I have 6 other users that at any time could be using the connection for what ever 1 pounding on xbox live ( also shaped) and more on the lan playing Urban with 3 to 4 connecting from the internet to Urban and teamspeak. I also selected a few services I don't use to lower priority and most of the rest selected and left to normal. I have tested it by down loading a couple of torrents while we are all playing and the wan side players seemed fine.

  • Shaping bridge(wired LAN+OPT1)[ver 2.0 RC1]

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.