• Current Status of QoS & Squid Transparent Proxy w/ 1.2-RC3?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    4k Views
    E
    Yeah its expected.
  • Traffic Shaper + Simple brigde possible?

    Locked
    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    11k Views
    E
    With the new shaper code you will be able to do bridge shaping and more. This is just an update for people to not mess with their systems.
  • Having trouble limiting specific host bandwidth

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    Ugh, alright.  I just didn't want to delete the rest of my rules… I guess it wont take too long to put them back :p Thanks.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @Perry: There is a bounty for multi interface traffic shaper http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,2718.45.html If you have a spare $…......:) Darn; I'm disappointed to hear. Maybe I'll add to the bounty though. Thank you for the reply
  • Shaping of a ssh tunnel

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • QOS w/ Vonage & Lost Bandwidth

    Locked
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    5k Views
    E
    If no problems arise a image for testing should be a matter of days.
  • Confirmation

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    OK thx for your answere … then maybe it's time to stop gaming ... unless I find some firewall distro that supports it, but so far pfsense has looked professional (y)
  • UDP/TCP question

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiple interfaces shaping

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    Ermal is working on it.  No ETA, unfortunately.
  • Traffic shaping tips and tricks.

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    76k Views
    E
    Correct me if i am wrong, You have a bridge active and are filtering with rules on specific interface meaning if_bridge(4) loaded net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=1 and shaping with rules pass out/in on $bridge_interface tagged WHATEVER queue(q1, q2) This way it should work! But the context is not that good since you're shaping IP traffic which might not make sense from bridge point of view. And you may run in strange problems if you mix route-to rules in between or have some form of dynamic network. The rationale is shape always with direction==in rules to be on safe side.
  • No rrd graphs after shaper reconfiguration

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    when createing a queue manually, are the Service Curve (sc) parameters mandatory? I created several aditional queues and i left blank those items (im not sure what to put in every one), did i made something stupid or the traffic shaper takes some default values? Regards
  • HTTP priority over p2p…

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    http://forum.m0n0.ch/index.php/topic,1208.msg4105.html#msg4105 ;)
  • QOS setting

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    K
    HI Thanks for your great reply If i do setup like two wan connected as load balancing to Lan and now traffic shaping between third Wan and Lan. Is that work out. Regards Krishna
  • Stupid Question Time!

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    You are enabling the shaping of the P2P protocol, not enabling that p2p protocol if that wasn't clear
  • Traffic shaping tutorial

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    8k Views
    A
    http://m0n0.ch/wall/list/showmsg.php?id=35/88
  • Upper limit larger than interface

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    fixed it. It was some weird error that was caused the first time I ran the Traffic Shaper Wizard. After I purged everything and set it up all over again it worked. Thanks for the speedy reply
  • Monetoring network traffic with Pfsense

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    bandwidthd, ntop.. all available in "Packages"
  • Scenario question

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    GruensFroeschliG
    You setup VIP's (Virtual IP's) Check out "Firewall" –> "Virtual IPs" Imho best is if you just use CARP-type VIP's even if you dont use the CARP functionalities. I assume you have a firewall-computer with 2 ports: WAN and LAN. Now just create 3 VIPs (plus the "real" IP on the interface itself) and create a 1:1 NAT for every server if you need it, or just forward the ports you need to your Servers. Like this your Servers and Clients are within the same subnet. Is this what you want? Or do you have 3 Interfaces and on one all your servers? Then the Traffic Shaper is of no use since it (currently) only runs between 2 Interfaces.
  • Traffic shaping severely limiting bandwidth

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    K
    I did make sure to use the right numbers.  The only bandwidth numbers I changed were at the beginning of the shaper and the parent queues.  I had 29000/4500 then changed it to megabits (29/4.5) with no luck.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.