• CODELQ - DUAL WAN FAILOVER - 2.4.5-p1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    560 Views
    W
    Not an emergency, but a real issue, no one has experienced this?
  • Analysis of fq_codel in limiters (dummynet)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    453 Views
    No one has replied
  • Couple of questions about floating rules for traffic shaping

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    683 Views
    S
    The floating rule should match regardless of interface (think of a router with 5 interfaces trying to duplicate all the shaping rules). There's not a need to tie them to interfaces. The wizard sets up a default setup. I think I would delete and run the wizard if changing types. The queues affect outbound traffic for the interface so downloading from the Internet would be LAN outbound and ack would be WAN outbound. The rules get set up differently, for instance I think VOIP UDP traffic doesn't have an interface but has a rule for Source and another for Destination. But POP/SMTP etc. TCP gets set on WAN according to destination port by default.
  • CBQ wizard has no priority for qInternet but it's required

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    322 Views
    No one has replied
  • Traffic Limiter for client traffic over site to site openvpn tunnel

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    310 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    595 Views
    bingo600B
    @Arnaud09 Assumption: You portforward those 3 services, each to their own isp inside lan ip ? Then i would put the pfSense wan on your isp routers inside lan on (fixed) ip addr xxx ... Don't use DHCP , and remember to set default gw on the pfsense to your routers inside ip address. And "portforward" the wanted ports on your isp router, to the routers inside lan on ip addr xxx (the pfSense wan ip). Now matching (portforwarded) traffic will hit the pfSense Wan interface. Then you need to do the same portforwarding once more on the pfSense , to portforward the interesting stuff on the WAN to the LAN. Now you can control access to the pfSense LAN (that would be your service lan) , by putting access rules on your pfSense wan interface (preventing unwanted packages from entering the WAN .. And thereby access the Lan. Be sure that your ISP router inside lan , and your pfSense inside lan does not have the same ip range or it will never work. I might have given multiple VIP's a try .. Haven't used those yet. But that might not be easy for a "Non experienced person" If you are able to add routes to your ISP Router , things might become a lot easier. /Bingo
  • Flooding logs with fq_codel_enqueue over limit

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    995 Views
    IsaacFLI
    @bobbenheim - I double checked and both limiter and child queue are already set to tail drop. Here are my settings (120M in, 12M out): target 5 interval 100 quantum 300 limit 10240 flows 20480 I think I got them from one of the posts here. It has been working ok with these since 2.4.5 came out. I still think that I had caused a problem with the pfblockerng floating rules located before my limiter floating rules. I have reversed the order and so far the log entries have not shown again.
  • pfctl: cxl0: driver does not support altq

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    933 Views
    T
    @DustSL - unfortunately I can't confirm if the Chelsio cards will work with ALTQ, but I can say that that they should work fine with limiters: I've setup FQ-CoDel based traffic shaping on a system that has had both T520 and T540 Chelsio cards and never experienced any issues. Hope this helps.
  • fq_codel Traffic Shaping with WiFi

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    Q
    For others that are in a similar situation... Turns out that with the Unifi Controller, you can change the default "User Group" to set a speed limit. Since over Wifi, I'm seeing 120/20, I set my limit to 100/20. When doing the speedtest, I'm now not seeing any bufferbloat and I'm getting an A+ from an F before, but I'm getting speeds around 80/20. Just a tip too. For reasons unknown, in my controller, I had to specify Kbps and couldn't set it to anything over 100Mbps. I was getting some sort of weird payload error. Some say it was a bug but who knows. For now, I'll keep it as it is and see how it works. Hopefully it will have a positive effect on zoom meetings.
  • Traffic Shaping on LAN

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    373 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiple Traffic Shaping Limiters

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    407 Views
    No one has replied
  • Wrong limiter speed

    45
    0 Votes
    45 Posts
    6k Views
    J
    @bobbenheim What's up BOB ! /boot/loader.conf.local - final - best result ever ! if_em_load="YES" cc_htcp_load="YES" hw.em.eee_setting="0" hw.em.rx_process_limit="-1" hw.em.txd="2048" hw.em.rxd="2048" net.link.ifqmaxlen="4096" 4 computer downloading debian iso 4.4 gig RTT never moved 0.6ms RTTsd never moved 0.2ms Lost 0.0 % this is far the best config ever limiter config Download Codel FQ_codel queue lenght 100 ecn enable limiter Queue Download Mask / Destination Adresse /32 Codel limiter config Upload Codel FQ_codel queue lenght 100 ecn enable limiter Queue Upload Mask / Source Adresse /32 Codel limiter on lan rules in= upload-queue out=download-queue with all helps ! all people sharing knoledge ! everything's possible! Thank you so muck
  • 1 wan , 1 lan, 1 bridge , bandwith priorities on bridge.

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    293 Views
    No one has replied
  • Monitor and report traffic per LAN device

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    330 Views
    No one has replied
  • Flexible Limits (Equal Bandwidth Splitting) + Multi Wan Problem

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    697 Views
    A
    Upgraded to 2.4.5, still the same problem.
  • Limiters using Alias

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    625 Views
    T
    @Stewart been running it for almost a month and it works well. As long as the limiter is masked it will create individual bucket in the alias list. Else, it's shared.
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    879 Views
    J
    @kiokoman said in Traffic Shaping (CODEL/FQ_CODEL) kills all traffic, no internet access: yes it's not working on 2.5.0 https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/9643 Thanks for info, I keep forgetting about the bug tracker. Watching that one now.
  • Failed to create QoS

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    558 Views
    B
    Which nic's are you using and what version of pfsense? If you are using nic's which use the ix driver then altq are disabled due to driver instability in 2.4.5 and earlier but It has recently been enabled in the 2.5 development snapshots again.
  • CoDel rewriting ICMP/UDP traceroute traffic

    6
    2
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    908 Views
    coldfire7C
    @bobbenheim Cake implementation would be nice!
  • Rocket League Ping Spikes and packet loss

    gaming traffic shaping codel ping ping spikes
    40
    0 Votes
    40 Posts
    14k Views
    R
    If you are not using limiters, then note this from the guide; The ALTQ framework is handled through pf and is closely tied to network card drivers. ALTQ can handle several types of schedulers and queue layouts. The traffic shaper wizard configures ALTQ and gives firewall administrators the ability to quickly configure QoS for common scenarios, and it allows custom rules for more complex tasks. ALTQ is inefficient, however, so the maximum potential throughput of a firewall is lowered significantly when it is active. pfSense software also supports a separate shaper concept called Limiters. Limiters enforce hard bandwidth limits for a group or on a per-IP address or network basis. Inside of those bandwidth limits, limiters can also manage traffic priorities.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.