• Something wrong after update 2.4.3

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    472 Views
    stephenw10S

    A lot more info needed.  ;)

    What version did you upgrade from?

    What hardware are you running on?

    Do you see any errors/collisions reported in Status > Interfaces?

    Steve

  • Problem upgrade 2.4.3 to 2.4.3_1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S

    How long did you wait after the upgrade rebooted?

    What hardware are you running on?

    On some older hardware or slow boot media the webgui can start significantly before the upgrade has completed. If you login at that point it may report the old version still. If you are connected to the console you will see the boot has not completed, the boot menu has not been shown yet.

    What error is shown on the CLI when you try to upgrade again?

    Steve

  • Upgrading from 2.3.4 to 2.4.0 hangs at db>

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    B

    OK, I got it to update from 2.3.4 to 2.3.5, but now it doesn't show any more updates after that.
    I've tried switching to all the other branches, & they all say it's up-to-date.
    Could this have to do with the FreeBSD 11 issue?
    Or is there another way I could get it to update to 2.4.3?

    ![2018-05-21 10_49_56-pfsense.tipping.lan - System_ Update_ System Update.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/2018-05-21 10_49_56-pfsense.tipping.lan - System_ Update_ System Update.png)
    ![2018-05-21 10_49_56-pfsense.tipping.lan - System_ Update_ System Update.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/2018-05-21 10_49_56-pfsense.tipping.lan - System_ Update_ System Update.png_thumb)

  • Upgrade to 2.4.3_1 Fails at First Attempt

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    4k Views
    D

    Same thing happened to me.  It failed on the first attempt.  After it rebooted I tried again.  It went through the updates, rebooted and then it's all ok.  Odd.

    Darkk

  • Configuration Compatability

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    915 Views
    S

    On comparison, there are differences in the XML sections.  The old version (8.0) has sysctl, pptpd, dnsmasq, bridge, and l7shaper that the new version (17.3) doesn't.  The new version (17.3) has dhcpdv6, unbound, notifications, mailreports, and dyndnses that the old version (8.0) doesn't.  I know some have to do with package differences but I wonder if some of the core changes scrambles the config on an import.  I'm reinstalling and manually moving the relevant portions of the XML over.  I'll see how that goes.

  • Minor upgrade bug related to ntpd

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    329 Views
    No one has replied
  • APU board won't boot anymore after upgrading from 2.4.2_1 to 2.4.3_1

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    560 Views
    S

    I managed to 'resolve' the issue, by restoring the configuration, do a fresh install and restore the old config.

    This are the steps I have followed:

    1. Download pfSense-CE-memstick-serial-2.4.3-RELEASE-amd64.img.gz
    2. Unzip and write to USB stick e.g. with a tool like rufus
    3. Boot APU board with USB stick
    4. Get a prompt using the rescue shell
    5. Plugin an addition USB stick (fat32 preformated) – needed as the installer image lets you mount /dev/da1 only read-only
    6. Mount partitions (mount /dev/ada0s1a /mnt && mount -t msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /tmp/usbstick)
    7. Copy configuration (cp -Rv /mnt/cf/conf /tmp/usbstick)
    9. Do a fresh install and assign interfaces
    10. Restore configuration via webinterface
    11. Check serial settings...

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    816 Views
    RonpfSR

    I did reinstall pfBlockerNG-dev yesterday before the reboot.

    pkg-static update -f Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100%    944 B  0.9kB/s    00:01 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100%    2 KiB  1.8kB/s    00:01 Processing entries: 100% pfSense-core repository update completed. 8 packages processed. Updating pfSense repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100%    944 B  0.9kB/s    00:01 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100%  126 KiB 129.5kB/s    00:01 Processing entries: 100% pfSense repository update completed. 469 packages processed. All repositories are up to date. pkg-static upgrade -f pkg Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue... pfSense-core repository is up to date. Updating pfSense repository catalogue... pfSense repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 1 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): Installed packages to be REINSTALLED:         pkg-1.10.5 [pfSense] Number of packages to be reinstalled: 1 Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/1] Reinstalling pkg-1.10.5... [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.5: 100% You may need to manually remove /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf if it is no longer needed. ls -al /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  46 May 20 11:48 /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf cat /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf ABI=FreeBSD:10:amd64 ALTABI=freebsd:10:x86:64 pkg-static upgrade Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue... pfSense-core repository is up to date. Updating pfSense repository catalogue... pfSense repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking for upgrades (0 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (0 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date.

    I got this in system logs :

    May 20 11:51:00 pkg-static pkg reinstalled: 1.10.5 -> 1.10.5
  • Warning - pfSense MAC Spoofing Might Permanently Change MAC Address

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    4k Views
    stephenw10S

    Yes the re(4) driver should show that too. Though if the BIOS reads it as the spoofed address I would expect the boot log to reflect that also:

    [2.4.3-RELEASE][admin@apu.stevew.lan]/root: dmesg | grep re0 re0: <realtek 8111="" 8168="" b="" c="" cp="" d="" dp="" e="" f="" g="" pcie="" gigabit="" ethernet="">port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0xf7a00000-0xf7a00fff,0xf7900000-0xf7903fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 re0: Using 1 MSI-X message re0: ASPM disabled re0: Chip rev. 0x2c000000 re0: MAC rev. 0x00200000 miibus0: <mii bus="">on re0 re0: Using defaults for TSO: 65518/35/2048 re0: Ethernet address: 00:0d:b9:37:30:10 re0: netmap queues/slots: TX 1/256, RX 1/256</mii></realtek>

    The rtl8111 chip is vey common (presumably because it's cheap!). There must be something special about your card, or broken.

    It would be interesting to see the pciconf output showing the actual chip used there.

    [2.4.3-RELEASE][admin@apu.stevew.lan]/root: pciconf -lv | grep re0 re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x012310ec chip=0x816810ec rev=0x06 hdr=0x00

    However I'm not sure there's a huge amount we can do here.

    Steve

  • New Install, No Internet Issue using Virgin Media (cable) modem

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    2k Views
    M

    @tim.mcmanus:

    If pfSense is getting an IP address on the WAN interface, the system is on the network.  If it cannot get upstream from there, the issue may be with the next device upstream.

    pfSense has an IP address and a traceroute fails from pfSense indicates to me that either the DHCP configuration is wrong, or the upstream device is not allow traffic from pfSense.

    If I add a USB network adapter as the WAN device, it all starts working immediately.

    I'm thinking it's hardware.

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    D

    Several switching of branch back and forth helped…

  • Installing PFSense with DDWRT + PIA

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    587 Views
    A

    You could have pfSense set up with PIA and then run the Linksys as an access point only. Do a search, there are several guides on how to set that up.

  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    stephenw10S

    Hmm, you should not have to force the speed/duplex unless the other side is set to fixed.

    Sounds like you may have some issues with those bge ports. I would start thinking about swapping them out when you can. Better to have a plan in place if any of them fail again.

    Steve

  • MOVED: Probleme de processeur lors de l'installation de Pfsense

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    227 Views
    No one has replied
  • Updating on top of Netgate/ADI install images

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    592 Views
    A

    Thanks, that's what I assumed but nice to have confirmation.

  • FpSense Upgrade Score 0 out of 4 - why?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    783 Views
    L

    Thank you!
    I'll bookmark this page and go through those items next time I attempt and upgrade and it fails.  :)

  • No WAN detected from static IP from ISP

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    O

    Looks like I spoke too soon. I did some config, couldn't get it working, and then reverted back to a saved config which was working. Rebooted pfsense and modem, and No WAN.

    I set a static IP on the WAN and gateway.

    The more I'm setting routes, the more confused I get. It's giving me inconsistent results. I actually reverted once and got it working, ran into this problem below, and reverted back now, and back to this problem.

    https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=147909.0

  • Add protocol selection to radius server configuration for pfSense 2.3.5

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    455 Views
    jimpJ

    No. Use 2.4.x for new features.

  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    GertjanG

    Hi,

    Now you have secured your "can go back in a snap", try a complete fresh install.

  • Upgrade 2.4.3 -> 2.4.3_1 - no download?

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    686 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.