• Installing pfSense free edition into AWS

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    9k Views
    ivorI
    We will not be offering any assistance with requests like these. pfSense project is directly funded by AWS and Azure sales. You don't have to use AWS if money is tight, there are plenty of VPS providers who support ISO import.
  • MOVED: Getting Started with the SG-1000

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    263 Views
    No one has replied
  • PFSense in Hyper-V / Class Pear not found in Chap.php

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    409 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @johnpoz: Don't tap either.. Use TUN… So you smited me for that - really??? There are reasons for doing this, for example being to Steam In-Home stream from a distant network using a VPN. Just because it's not the most sane thing to bridge ports on a router doesn't mean there aren't valid use cases, so don't just smack down people for doing so. There's a reason they are in pfSense. In my network I have a 10GbE card in my router and workstation, which are bridged to a bonded fiber port to my switch for the rest of the network, and a similar situation for my file server. I don't have $500 - $1k sitting around for a fancy 10GbE switch, so pfSense does my heavy lifting until I can get my hands on that beautiful Unifi 16 XG @MrClayPole: So are bridges not supported on pfSense? They are, but are not suggested due to things like this, and it requires your router to interact with the packet which is slower than the in-hardware stuff traditional switches have. Hopefully this is patched sooner than later, but for now stay at an older version of pfSense if you need router advertisement and IPv6. I use bridges just fine, aside from the issue in OP's post.
  • Pfsense install on ClearFog Pro/Base platform

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    606 Views
    No one has replied
  • Unable to check for updates[

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    946 Views
    S
    Downloaded a fresh image, installed from USB and all is fine now.
  • PfSense behind multiple existing routers

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    Thanks, I'll go with the quad ethernet card then.
  • Setup gmirror at installation - pfSense 2.4.2

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    jimpJ
    I tried many variations of "pfSense 2.4 gmirror" (and raid, mirror, etc) in Google and they all pointed to relevant threads here that mentioned using ZFS instead, including this thread which was at the top of most of the results. gmirror is inferior to ZFS, and it was more trouble to implement gmirror all over again than to use ZFS which was already in the new installer.
  • Just installed 2.4.3 on old computer….nothing I do works....now what?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    A
    Thanks for the info. :( :o
  • 0 Votes
    17 Posts
    3k Views
    ?
    Thanks KOM, I have created a ticket here. I fully expect to get shouted at though :) Thanks for your help.
  • Vodafone Business Fiber settings for pfSense

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    979 Views
    Raul RamosR
    Hi Vodafone fiber in Portugal connects to a GPON device ( in bridge mode) using DHCP in Vlan 100 for data, DHCP Vlan 101 VOIP and DHCP VLAN 105 for IPTV. The default router info is 192.168.1.254 router IP, vodafone/vodafone for user/pass.
  • 2.4.3 install problem

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    666 Views
    jimpJ
    2.3.x is based on FreeBSD 10.x, 2.4.x is based on FreeBSD 11.x, so lots of changes in between. It's possible your hardware or BIOS config doesn't like the 2.4.x memstick since it supports UEFI. There may be some option you need to change in the BIOS to work around that, or perhaps a BIOS update. You can, however, install 2.3.5 and then update to 2.4.3 from there if all else fails. Another suggestion, ditch Rufus and use Etcher.
  • Cant Access From Lan to Wan After Clean install

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    439 Views
    stephenw10S
    You don't need to have any NAT rules at all if you don't want/need them. The default settings will NAT all traffic from the LAN subnet to the WAN IP address and that should work there. You will have an asymmetric route if the LAN side WIN7 client is not using pfSense as it's gateway. Depending on what the Win server box is doing it may block traffic. Steve
  • Unable to check for updates

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    There are a number of threads on this. Depends on your setup as to how you upgrade. Most I've seen (and had to do) involve being physically connected to upgrade via console. Searching…. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=109370.0
  • 2.4 branch on Apollo lake: post your experience

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    655 Views
    M
    Hi to all, I have used pfsense on two apollo lake setups. My first apollo lake setup was an ASROCK mATX J3455 with two additional NICs and a Draytek VigorNic 132 occupying the expansion slots. I had no problems before the hpet bug. The setup was basic intended for home use. The hpet bug hit me after update and made the system unbootable. After reading the forums, I managed to successfully install (safe mode, loader.conf etc) a fresh 2.4.3 and setup a working firewall. I didn't notice any high CPU usage, but as I wrote it is a basic setup. I replaced the setup with another apollo lake, an ASROCK J3355 ITX (the VigorNic in the single expansion slot) due to a hardware problem of the previous MOBO. Interestingly, this MOBO was not affected with the hpet bug and installed 2.4.3 normally. Actually what happened was I forgot to enter safe mode but to my surprise the setup didn't freeze and continued. With respect to CPU usage, again I didn't notice any abnormality. However, I had to stop using pfsense, because for some unknown reason (I couldn't figure out anything from the logs) the box was crashing and rebooting every 15 mins or so. I have excluded hardware fault because this box now runs opnsense without any problems. The hpet bug that hit me with an update was a big let-down. Don't get me wrong or anything by no means do I blame pfsense or so; this was a core freebsd bug from what I have read. Having running stable for 6 months or so, it was shocking that an update would essentially destroy the system and also was a hassle trying to fix it. After this I keep my ISP's modem preconfigured and aside. I also beats me why j3355 was not affected by the bug. Best
  • Problem with console installation

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    Ok thanks, I will try to contact the Lanner support, maybe the know what's going on.
  • Status Queues Under-reading on 2.4.3

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    773 Views
    NeoDudeN
    Bump. Anybody else experiencing this?
  • 2.4.3 update from 2.4.2 graphs and bandwidth problem

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    858 Views
    V
    Everything seems fine… speed gave me issues but with a Ubiquiti AP if slected fulldx speed instead of auto.. i just tried without the bridge... same thing... going to install 2.4.2 from scratch and see if it makes any difference.
  • Http traffic blocked over openvpn site to site

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    642 Views
    N
    I had a similar issue when upgrading to 2.4.2. I haven't solved it… https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=141487.msg772193
  • MOVED: Netgate Coreboot Upgrade error

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    252 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.