• Amd64 Memstick Install and Restore from nanobsd

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    G
    Looks like this is resolved in 2.3.1 as there was a bug preventing Advanced->Misc changes from being saved. Workaround in the bug comments also. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6146
  • 2.3 Web UI lockout changing protocol to HTTPS

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    @mer: You're accessing the WebUI from WAN, HTTP, change it to HTTPS and get locked out, is that correct? Yes. That's correct. @mer: But if you do the same operation from LAN, it works as you expect? Yes.
  • [SOLVED] Not seeing traffic behind a second switch pfSense 2.3

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    848 Views
    A
    This is solved.  This was my fault due to old wiring. Switch was plugged into the old router not the main switch.
  • Changing from NanoBSD to full install

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    E
    Thanks! I will try this out during weekend  8)
  • Migrating from flash USB to SATA-CF

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    847 Views
    E
    Last time, I changed to another USB memory stick (larger one), flash the NanoBSD to the new stick, export config from old one, boot up with the new one, then in the new one I chose "import" and all good!
  • Help,not sure that my configure correct or not?can help me see?

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    T
    picture3 ![Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 6.05.54 PM.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 6.05.54 PM.png) ![Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 6.05.54 PM.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-04-29 at 6.05.54 PM.png_thumb)
  • NO LiveCD? V2.3.0

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    H
    https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Writing_Disk_Images
  • Upgrade to 2.3

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    4k Views
    C
    @adam65535: If you do decide to downgrade that member make sure you use a backup from the previous version and not 2.3.  I am pretty sure you can't use a 2.3 config on previous 2.2 and 2.1 versions. I have a full backup and an config backup from the previous version . I allways make backups before any update . The ideea behind 2.3 is ok but my opinion is that it was a to early relase and it's unstable and has a big lack of features and packages that existed before 2.3.
  • Multiple update issues going from 2.2.2-Release to 2.3\.

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    sforsythe: I replied back on your ticket but wanted to reply here as well to make sure you see it. adam65535's theory sounds plausible. The fact that turning off the secondary makes the problem stop indicates a problem along the lines of an IP conflict, which is what the scenario he describes ends up being. It's something similar along those lines.
  • Unable to check for updates - 2.3-RC

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    check the sticky. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=109690.0
  • Manually updated 2.2.4 to 2.2.6 and picked the wrong platform - now what

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    luckman212L
    Oh thanks for your help.  Thought that was the case but wasn't sure.  Looks like there were a few APUs we had out there that must have been running SSDs and some others that were running nano off an SD card like you said.  So that's where I got confused and because it's been so long since I worked on those I just lost track of it.  The perils of aging!! Thanks  ;)
  • Downgrade images for Netgate SG-8860 ?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    894 Views
    N
    I could have swore that in the past week, the download link (USB Memstick Installer Image) at https://portal.pfsense.org had a LOT of older versions, going way back. Maybe I'm remembering another link?
  • MOVED: PF 2.3 and VM

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    443 Views
    No one has replied
  • Avoid autoremove "unwanted" packges

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    840 Views
    D
    One of the reasons for the 2.3 upgrade was to simplify the package install and maintenance abilities. The flip side is that existing packages need to be updated to meet the new criteria and some of the original maintainers aren't around. If the package you're looking for hasn't been upgraded to 2.3, you'll have to reinstall it manually.
  • 2.3 upgrade & HAproxy

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    906 Views
    P
    Yes searching is easy, just type some words like "haproxy 2.3 error" produces exactly 10 results for me, several having more or less the same information about removing old files. Or if you search for "haproxy 2.3" the very first result is a "Installation and Upgrades / HEADS UP on 2.3 upgrade if using haproxy". Anyway if your still having issues after trying the removal of old files, please do post the error messages you experience and maybe some advice specific to your installation can be provided. Regards, PiBa-NL
  • Pfsense upgrade to 2.3 fail (An error occurred on pkg execution rc=70)

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    4k Views
    T
    @Colin: I had a similar issue due to my default gateway not being set during the upgrade process. Same here. Did you find a workaround?
  • Hardware Checksum Offloading

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Is it possible to do a full restore from 2.3 to 2.2.6

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    JailerJ
    Eh, never mind, hardware died so it's a moot point now. At least I have regular config backups.
  • (54: Connection reset by peer)

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    8k Views
    C
    What Phil said. Specifically, something that was communicating with the web GUI's web server. Likely normal and safe to disregard.
  • High Delay Average on WAN

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    C
    Your gateway monitor delay depends on what your monitor IP is configured as. Where you're seeing 1-2 ms response times, it's either something at the same physical location as you that you're monitoring, or you have a fiber connection. Anything coax or copper, you're going to have 10+ ms to your next hop router past where it touches the coax or copper. Nothing about that looks high at all, all very much normal.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.