If we all got $1 for every "Gah! pfSense is hacked/broken/whatever!" and it turned out to be a configuration issue, we would all be able to retire.

Thanks for the quick reply! I can't believe it was that easy, I guess I overlooked those settings!

Nat reflection is ALWAYS the worse option to choose.. I don't understand why anyone would ever want to nat reflect.. if host.domain.tld is on the same network next to you - then why would you not just resolve host.domain.tld to that IP.. Why would you ever want to go to the public IP to be reflected back in?? As to forwarding port X to port Y.. That is always a work around in itself to all to go to the same service with the limitation of napt and only 1 public IP, etc. If you want to go to host.domain.tld:port then go there where host.domain.tld resolves to the local IP and not the public ip..

Also where did you come up with this 200.10.1 ?? That is not rfc1918 space.. Its owned by inetnum: 200.10.0/22 owner: Administradora BANCHILE de Fondos Mutuos Country: CL You do not just pull space out of thin air and try and use it, even if behind a nat. Your HOME Network should be using rfc1918 space..

I stand corrected! ~Mat

Hello! Thank you for your interest in TNSR and SCLR. My intermediate step, until consumer equipment actually is getting near solving the throughput challenges with 10gbps, is to build/buy a setup similar to the XG-7100 (great thing with the desktop chassis model!) or the XG-1541, and set it up as a software router. pfSense will probably be my base configuration, in a virtualized setup allowing me to do background configuration of more experimental setups which I switch in and out of active duty, until I see a good setup where I'm getting stable routing for closer to (if not fully saturating) the 10gbps line. The current plan is to make TNSR available on all XG series (desktop and rack mount). I know you're preparing TNSR for on premise configurations, but depending on how the setup is between TNSR and SCLR, do you have any plan on some "beta" or license transition where users who may fit the SCLR use case down the road may help/try out TNSR while slowly moving towards the target of having a SCLR setup running? Great questions, unfortunately I cannot answer them right now because SCLR is under development. I would be happy to follow up with you once more information is available for public. My apologies for not being able to provide better answers today.

Die Anzeige der Rufnummer ist von Anbieter zu Anbieter unterschiedlich und wird in der Fritzbox korrigiert, wenn du dort auch Telekom hinterlegst. Bei "anderm Anbieter" passiert das nicht bzw. du mußt das manuell machen. im ip-phone-forum ist da einiges zu finden. Gruß pfadmin