??? The General tab of Squid's options has a Proxy Interfaces section with a combobox of all your interfaces. Pick the ones you want.

Hey Steve, thanks for the information.

I will be sure to avoid any firewall mis-configuration and verify the current settings - as they were implemented before I had the job - do not cause any speed loss errors on bandwidth throughput.

Much appreciated.

As Grimson mentioned, I just put both signals on the same VLAN. For some reason I thought VLANs are predetermined on AP I know its pretty stupid to think that but for some reason I had idea thats how it is with EAP 1300. Anyway, everything works as intended as of now. Going to play with it more and then move onto Win Server and see how things work there.

The idea is to simplify the process. The customer would not need to purchase a voucher from tyeh counter or kiosk.

See the link below. This on is made in the Philippines A coin operated Wifi machine

https://www.google.com.ph/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.adopisowifi.com/articles/&ved=2ahUKEwj98OHy5IDdAhVMOY8KHc85Ad8QFjABegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw1UhJuudl4WNVpiAj1QHA_V&cshid=1534945349119

I'm pretty sure it was a standard pinout for both connectors. The VGA header is 2mm not 0.1" as you say.

However I don't see anything obvious now. You can probably test the ground pins and infer the rest from their positions... assuming it is standard.

Steve

So to add to @rainer_d comment, I've recently purchased the APU2C4 as my pfsense box and frankly considering the costs I'm rather impressed. I'm have a WAN\LAN setup running Squid, Squid Guard, Suricata, PFBlockerng, and ntopng - my main focus is keeping my kids from getting into too much trouble as they start exploring the internet. Looking at the performance to energy cost, I really feel this box hits a lot of check boxes. Sadly, I'm limited in my bandwidth so I can't speak to how it handles on 1Gbps, but I've hear you can get close but I don't know if would need to limit the packages your running.

If you do end up do end up looking at the APU2 setup, here is what I came up with so far to improve performance:

Get thermal grease and stand the box vertically - Reduced my CPU temp by 10C Avoid ClamAV, it will eat the CPUs alive with large downloads Suricata seems to perform better than Snort, but is twice as hard to setup... but twice the trouble is twice the fun in my book. Between the multi core support and the APU2 supported inline mode, you can get IDS on without to much impact to your system. Get the 4GB version, it's not much more and gives you lots of RAM to play with.

Adding the WAN rule will not add a port forward.

You add a port forward in Firewall > NAT, Port Forward. There you can optionally (recommended) have the port forward automatically maintain the firewall rule on WAN for you.

Yes, you need both ports forwarded.

In your case you can do a range from 5198 to 5199 and do it in one rule.

@nogbadthebad Aahh okay. Thank you so much!

So you want to route the whole upstream traffic to the Sonicwall?
Just open the gateway settings and check "Default Gateway". No extra route needed.

Yeah, I posted a thing for him on lime-tech about it, I just haven’t gotten an answer yet. I’m sure he is busy. Thank you for all your help and time!

As per OP's question What VPN Services Works with Plex/ Xbox. I would like to recommend a few such as NordVPN, Express VPN, PureVPN.
I would like to refer the Best VPN for Plex as it also provides a guide on [spam link removed]
I hope the guide helps.

Well I guess I had the same issue and then got registered again.

Since you are mentioning you want to grab the image on my USB key, Just use etcher as Deredict mentioned above.

Cool. Thanks for the info guys. I was trying to better understand the difficulties and reasoning.

Talk about back luck of timing with all of the EOLs. I can't wait!

The mailing lists were retired due to GDPR. A message was sent out just before the lists were shut down.

They were low traffic anyhow, and discussion is better served here on the forum or Reddit.

I cannot even ping gateway from router which is ip of LAN interface

Yes you can "bridge" interfaces to somewhat simulate a "switch" It is going to SUCK performance wise and completely over complicate the configuration. Are you filtering on each member, are you filtering just on the bridge interface, etc.

Oh did I say it SUCKS before compared to an actual switch port - right?

If you have a switch - there is ZERO reason to contemplate WASTING a very useful router interface that could be used for you know another network so you could actually firewall between your networks/vlans on your "router" vs using it as a switch port ;)

If you need/want a switch on your router/firewall - then buy hardware that actually as built in switch ports. The sg3100 for example, or the 7100.. Pretty sure their other new models coming will also include actual switch ports.

Yes you can bridge - No you have no reason to do it.. Is like you CAN if you really wanted to poke yourself in the eye with a stick.. But normally people tend to think this a bad idea.. Same goes for using router interfaces as switch ports via bridging them ;)

Let this thread serve as an example of seeing the problem, setting a maintenance window, and renumbering. It can be a MUCH better path than trying to NAT all the things because you decided to deploy 192.168.1.0/24 or, much worse, 10.0.0.0/8.

@kom It actually seems they made some sort of changes since the last time I did testing over a year ago. I did some new testing before the bandwidth upgrade and noticed these changes.

@derelict Thank you.
How to suppress these error messages? This IP is not down, and the device is under our control.