Yes it's possible. You should start by reading the stickies and the docs. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7001.0.html

Hi there, Thanks for informing us of this issue. We're currently investigating the situation and the issue should be resolved shortly. Thank you for your patience and I apologize for any inconvenience. Regards, Mydhili The YouTube Team +1 for Google if they fix this one.  Although -1 for me and my employees in lost productivity time spent watching youtubes  :D

If you haven't figured it out already what your doing is analogous to adding more faucets to your plumbing. You can't pour more water than the main that feeds into the whole house.

Hi ermal! thank you good choice, it is what Im implementing on linux, with some trouble. But Id like to hear cases about pfsense behavior in this scenario without further configuration (qos, etc). Or, maybe, opnion like "pfsense works well in this situation, but only with qos configured".

Dude, that was brilliant.  Thanks a lot!

Just for completeness. 1.3 has support for multiple DYNDNS accounts on multiple interfaces. In fact you can even run multiple dydns services on the same interface. Ermal

Support for this is committed to 1.3 please grab a snapshot and test it.

Well probably the best place to start is the doc http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Main_Page Also try reading the stickies in the openVPN and IPSEC subforum. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/board,39.0.html http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/board,16.0.html

And would this configuration give me an increase in speed as its not going through a specific NIC but 4 load balanced NIC's

In the past we've used the D-Link DSL-302T - I think the newer version is http://www.d-link.co.uk/?go=jN7uAYLx/oIJaWVUDLYZU93ygJVYKuJXStvhLPG3yV3oWI54gqltbNlwaaRp6z4sAmu5j3cf/YENBs7l3KLpL0YWte3f Otherwise try the Zyxel 79x series - theyre very stable and not too expensive.

Thanks, so anyone with 4 or more modems and config similar to this?  :)

I think you could you get wireless router (linksys) and get it to do a site survey for the 2nd wireless WAN, this would then get the WAN IP onto the router, which you could then connect via CAT5 to the pfSense OPT1 interface. You probably want to stop the Wireless Router from doing NAT.

This article is about something completly different. Its about having two seperate networks with each their own router. This is not the same as having actually two routers in ONE network.

You could change your allow all rule on the LAN interface to use specifically that gateway, and then create allow rules above it for HTTP SMTP etc that use the failover for the gateway. That way, the traffic that doesn't meet the requirements above is only allowed through the main interface.

@Coldfirex: Is this something that could be scripted? I'm sure it is, but It's easier for me to manually switch my tunnels then to take the time to try to put a script together and test it.

my config is below WAN interface (rl0) Status up DHCP up  MAC address 00:00:b4:c4:49:f3 IP address 192.168.1.21  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.1.1 ISP DNS servers 192.168.1.1 192.168.0.1 62.248.102.190 195.175.39.39 195.175.39.40 212.174.191.252 Media 100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets 1332323/1048476 (1.56 GB/140.39 MB) In/out errors 0/0 Collisions 0 LAN interface (xl0) Status up MAC address 00:b0:d0:38:a1:fc IP address 10.0.0.200  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0 Media 100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets 2692085/3378064 (349.51 MB/3.93 GB) In/out errors 0/0 Collisions 0 OPT1 interface (rl1) Status up DHCP up  MAC address 00:00:b4:c4:49:77 IP address 192.168.0.7  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0 Gateway 192.168.0.1 Media 100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets 1377820/1067173 (1.68 GB/109.61 MB) In/out errors 0/0 Collisions 0 OPT2 interface (rl2) Status up DHCP up  MAC address 00:e0:4c:77:1d:24 IP address 195.174.7.12  Subnet mask 255.255.0.0 Gateway 195.174.0.1 Media 100baseTX <full-duplex>In/out packets 3319084/528926 (857.15 MB/82.23 MB) In/out errors 0/0 Collisions 0</full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex></full-duplex>

There is a bunch of stuff in the IPsec forum about using IPsec on secondary WANs and ideas about failover. Here's a link that may offer some insight: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,6952.0.html More can be found by searching….