• Time Based Traffic Shapping

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    adjusting queues would work. moving already established traffic from one queue to another one won't.
  • VOIP Traffic not in correct queues

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    B
    Yes I have six vlan interfaces WAN, LAN, OP1, OPT2, OPT3, OPT4 (WAN,LAN,VOIP,CAPTIVE PORTAL,WLAN,VENTRILO)
  • Penalty limiting in 1.2 final

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    Did you reset states after running the shaper wizard? How did you specify the lanhosts in the penalty field? Did you set WAN and LAN  as outbound and inbound interface when running the wizard?
  • Horribly slow COPY on SMB share

    Locked
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    8k Views
    C
    OK, I think I've resolved this problem. I've done the following steps: Tweaked the Windows Registry using numerous HOW-TO's found on the Internet, especially TCP Windows Size, Request Buffer Size and TCP 1323 Options. Rebooted the Windows server. This has resolved the problem, and copying a 300MB file now takes approximately 2 minutes! Thanks for everyone's assistance and time.
  • Shapping traffic between DMZ and WAN, but *not* DMZ and LAN?

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    Im running 1.2 final and I may be trying to do something similar, can someone confirm? I have my Webserver in the DMZ and have a LAN and WAN if.  Currently I am shaping the LAN and WAN with simple shaping to prioritze the VoIP data.  I also want to limit all LAN -> WAN traffic to some KB limit to ensure the DMZ if gets all the bandwidth it needs. Since the DMZ is bridged to the WAN, is this not possible in 1.2 ? Thanks
  • Pptp shapping

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • PFsense single shaper

    Locked
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    5k Views
    H
    If you create lots of queues and assign each host to a queue yes.
  • Cannot access Status -> Queues anymore

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    In my case, it's finally works by doing the following. Setup Traffic Shaper by the wizard, then goto Firewall: Shaper: Queues to setup the bandwidth for each queue. For example, given smaller maximum bandwidth to P2P traffic, then the Status: Traffic shaper: Queues can be load without problem. Thanks hoba! I know I have been asked many dump questions but your help is most appreciated! Aldo
  • Priority on WWW traffic

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    @brizio: Ok, thanks but is it possible define a maximum bandwith that an user can utilize ? I mean in case I have a 2MB of bandwith on my Wan link I would like that an user can utilize a miximum of 1MB, is it possible ? Thanks This may be done by squid more simple: define a one connection speed less than maximum available for this acl. In this case is possible to make difference between http traffic types
  • SIP Traffic Shaping question

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    Multiinterface shaing is not really working in 1.2 (search the forum) but it will be much much better in 1.3 (see the trafficshpaer thread in the bounty section). For now you could do something like this: wan upstream is upstream on wan interface lan downstream is downstream of ALL your wans This won't work perfect of course but it's the best that you can do in 1.2 currently, at least when working with only one pfSense. Other option would be to have an additional system inline on wan only doing shaping from wan to lan as workaround until 1.3 is available. ISP1-------wan/pfsense/lan-------wan          lan----- ISP2-----------------------------wan2 pfSense optx----- ISP2-----------------------------wan3        opty---                                 ...          ...
  • RE: Traffice Shaping over VPN

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    5k Views
    H
    Doablo in 1.3. Search the forum.
  • 70% bandwidth for qwanacks still not enough?

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    H
    I think this is a general problem with asymetrical links. I have a 16000/800 kbit/s ADSL2+ at home and if I download at full speed my upstream is almost full with ack packets only. If then other traffic comes on top it might see some drops. However 125 drops in 1 day 4 hours is really not much or better said almost nothing. I would simply just ignore it.
  • Ipsec vpn shaping

    Locked
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    E
    The answer has changed slightly. Search the forums. Doable in 1.3 or through the bounty system. It allows full shaping of ipsec tunnels inbound and outbound. Ermal
  • Traffic Shapping into ALIX board

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    Yes, the only thing different between embedded/CD and full installation is the option to use additional packages with full installs. All basefeatures are included in the embedded version as well.
  • How priority selective protocols?

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Getting high pings in games when using traffic shaper

    Locked
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    P
    thanks Hoba, will try this
  • 0 Votes
    10 Posts
    5k Views
    H
    Good to hear  :)
  • Calculating the required bandwidth for ACK queues for asymetric link

    Locked
    53
    0 Votes
    53 Posts
    100k Views
    E
    As Scott said in some posts before ask your question in another thread. The answer to your question is a plain NO. Remember that this is just a recommendation and not suitable to every case. Ermal
  • Outbound FTP Shaping

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    W
    I can tell FTP sucks. I spent an hour searching around these forums and mailing lists through Google and came up with the same conclusion. I was hoping maybe someone knew something new, oh well.. Thanks for the response. I'll keep my eyes open for 1.3.
  • Shapping Help

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H
    Trafficshaping in pfSense happens always outbound at an interface. This means your WAN upstream is shaped outbound at WAN whereas the WAN downstream is shaped outbound at interface LAN.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.