@steveits said in SG-3100 Loadbalance and failover:
I've seen comments elsewhere that Starlink uses CGNAT.
Well then I saw it right 😉
Aha, this is not the best situation, because you can only hope that the CGNAT is only because of the few IPv4 address space of the provider and there are no nonsense filtering rules on the NAT.
It's like when you're at work and you need two hands and it's one fixed behind your back.
It's also strange that they use 192.168.0.0/16 and not 10.0.0.0/8, they're not that out of addresses then, hmmm?