• CLI Options to Re-establish Collapsed Tunnel

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    492 Views
    L
    @jimp Thanks! Will start digging into this.
  • IPsec (VTI) memory leak.

    3
    2
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    596 Views
    0daymaster0
    @jimp So I don't have definitive proof but both my core router and branch router started swapping out. My branch router filled up its swap then crashed. My core router would have crashed also but it has 32 GB of RAM while my branch router only has 16 GB of RAM. The memory usage tracks exactly with the backup job. Core router memory overview including swap usage: [image: 1578929196685-86018311-ff80-4f6e-b75d-d9e87f6688d2-image.png] Branch router memory overview including swap usage: [image: 1578929249429-8f08546d-07dd-419b-a5a2-c71ed244eb9a-image.png] For the time being I am moving all my tunnels that I can over to OpenVPN. This is unfortunate as OpenVPN does not get good performance and I have some remote sites with Fortigate firewalls. Fortigate does not support OpenVPN.
  • IPSec/ Road Warrior not working on pfsense2.4.4

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    250 Views
    No one has replied
  • max number of ipsec tunnels for c3758 processor

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    926 Views
    L
    IOW the limitation is likely not the number of IPsec tunnels, but the total amount of traffic they carry, which will run into bandwidth limits or CPU encryption/decryption capacity limits, whichever comes first. You can realistically expect 400-900 Mbps of total encrypted traffic on that box, depending on traffic complexity. Hope this helps.
  • Problem with NAT on IPSEC for Networks not in Phase2

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    259 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    498 Views
    JeGrJ
    @Sal said in Is it necessary to add the 4500(IPsec Nat-T) and 500 (ISAKmp) on the WAN?? pfsense 2.4.4: I thought that the important part is to add the rules on the IPsec interface, not the WAN. Is this correct ?? Rules for 4500/500 on your IPSEC interface? Makes no sense. Those ports have to be working on your WAN so incoming IPSEC connections are passed through. On your tunnel/IPSEC interface those rules for those ports make no sense. But IMHO IPSec Ports are accepted automatically on WAN if IPSEC connections are configured. but I noticed that the tunnel is connected. IPSEC can be initiated bi-directional. So every side can be initiator or receiver. The tunnel coming up doesn't mean you already have working rules as it could have been initiated from the second site to the first your created the rules yourself. But as stated above, if I remember correctly IPSEC is created automatically (and that automation can be switched off in adv. settings)
  • Port-forward IPSec-Traffic

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    297 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec rules to only allow specific pc's

    1
    2
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    241 Views
    No one has replied
  • IKEv2 to Windows10

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    2k Views
    K
    Hello, sorry for the delay! It works now perfect for me and I think it was a problem wit my mobile-connection. It works with the Android StrongSwan-App, with the default configuration on Windows 10 (IKEv2) and with the PowerShell generated connection mentioned by @lfoerster. Thank you Robert
  • One side pfsense behind NAT 1:1 and another as peer

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    J
    Someone? =/
  • IPsec Tunnel goes down with end of SA Lifetime - SOLVED!!!

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    5k Views
    P
    SOLVED!!!! Searching for answers I strumbled on another post that was having the same problem. And it pointed me to a problem in my setup… I had PFS enabled on the pfSense and disabled on the USG. Thanks to those that stopped to help, hopefully this post will help someone in the future. Scot
  • What is proper way to add P2 routes for additional networks?

    3
    1
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    520 Views
    R
    @jimp Thank you. Perfect explanation and I think you may have solved my issue. I was not doing the P2 segments at the hub correctly. I didn't have any P2 entries with links between remote offices. I kept trying to create them with the hub as the distribution point.
  • IPsec slow even on direct local Gbps link

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    987 Views
    R
    @lguy2000 I didn't try those particular settings yet. I'm testing on 1gb WAN to WAN. Both sides on ATT fiber and only getting about 60Mbps tops. Phase 1 is AES128-GCM, 128 bit with AES-XCBC hash on DH14 Phase 2 is AES128-GCM, 128 with no hash, DH14
  • How to measure IPSec tunnel throughput using Iperf3 and UDP protocol

    1
    2
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    190 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPsec IKEv2 with two P2 - traffic selectors unacceptable

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    jimpJ
    What do the lines for the network(s) look like in /var/etc/ipsec/ipsec.conf on both sides? What does ipsec statusall show on both sides? This is probably one of many things fixed by the IPsec swanctl conversion on 2.5.0, but you may not want to make that leap on production systems yet.
  • (SOLVED) IPSec with VPN clients

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    861 Views
    P
    I solved it! As suspected the problem was in the second P2 that is dealing with the VPN subnet. Each P2 should have a match on the other site but mirrored. And since I needed: VPN clients connected to Office A to be able to access machines in Office B LAN and VPN clients connected to Office B to be able to access machines in Office A LAN This required a third pair of P2 on both sides. [image: 1578251647497-ipsec_p2_final.png] Thanks @netblues for the ideas!
  • Multiple P2's show on PFsense to PFsense connections with same routes??

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    566 Views
    WB3FFVW
    So looking at the VPN config screen (I use IKEv2), I see under advanced options for Disable Rekey, and Disable Reauth, along with a margintime setting. Is this saying that I just need to select "disable rekey" to make this work correctly??
  • IPSec with remote subnet that's also another local subnet

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    336 Views
    No one has replied
  • How to let PFsense IPsec "Route Vti" interface response to PING?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    bluegrass-168B
    @jimp This works, thanks! [image: FGTest.jpg]
  • Mobile IPsec clients cannot see traffic from LAN

    2
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    343 Views
    DerelictD
    My first thought is your USB ethernet is misbehaving. How is your IPsec tunnel configured?
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.