in ur case, do u want this?
in simple word, your LAN client, want to bind an IP (WAN1) then if WAN1 disconnected, u want LAN client bind to WAN2 IP, is that correct?
if yes, try add NAT-Rule….
You can find at
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,10407.0.html
I was folow this guide but speed is not perfect now i find solution to increase speed
End of story :
Now my 5 WAN balance like a charm. All I had to do is to remove the default rule on the WAN firewall…
Maybe a good thing to a in tutorials.
This forum provides an excellent search function:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?action=search
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,17915.0.html
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,13815.0.html
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,11685.0.html
edit: cheesyboofs is faster :D
Yes.
If you've set up multiWAN loadbalancing you already know how.
Just set the type of the balancing pool to "server" instead of "gateway".
After that create a "virtual server" and use the created server-pool.
You can not change the default route, but you can create a load balancer pool that monitors the wan and the cisco isdn router lan link.
So then if the wan fails it will actually route all traffic from the LAN out through the cisco ISDN.
This will actually work, it does not need to live on the wan interface perse.
Alternatively create a opt interface on the pfsense box with the ISDN router stuck behind that. Then it will work in mostly the same fashion.
Handling DNS in a working fashion will be a tad bit more difficult though since your failover link is not a always on.
Both approaches sound promising. Even with a single web page on 1.2.x, I guess images can be fetched across both links if the web browser uses several TCP connections.
Thanks for getting back to me.
Martin.
as a quick and dirty method, i would use ssh tunneling inside the vpn:
http://cyberknights.com.au/doc/PuTTY-tunnelling-HOWTO.html
a cleaner method would be to have this other server also connect over ipsec client vpn.