Sorry, It was a notice mostly for users not developers.
After syncing with RELENG_1 cvs everything works fine. Outgoing traffic shaping too. Thanks.

Nor can we sync dummynet rules to ALTQ :)  No, this will require significantly more effort.

–Bill

Thks. I shall try several tests

Use it at your own risk, no support will be given, yadda, yadda.

Yes, I understand that this quits of frames of the project.

But i very much need for filtering bridge & shaper
May be there is other way for join 2 subnets one range? Without use the bridge, but filtering and shaping traffic?
This structure to my network
(10.62.0.0/24: 10.62.0.1-inet router + about 10 hosts) <-WAN intf-> pfSense <- LAN intf -> (10.62.0.0/24: all other hosts)
All traffic between left and right subnets can be go without any nat but any protocols i want directing with rules & shaping

Any advice(idea)?

First run the shaper to get a basic config. Then create queues for all the servers with an upperlimit of 5,2,1,2 mbit/s. Add rules that assign each server IP to one of the queues.

To get started "abuse" the voipqueue for one of the servers (enter the Server IP at the VOIP page when running the Wizard). After the wizard has finished uncheck the realtime and add an upperlimit instead to the created voipqueues. Also lowering the priority makes sense. Then create a pair of these rules for each of your servers. Apply the settings and reset states before you test your new config.

@datafirm:

Still seeing issues on latest releng_1.  Can you post to this thread once a fix has been committed.

Thank you!

Hmmm, we commit'd something yesterday.  I'll see what more needs to be done.

–Bill

I'm not too convonced that this is working under all conditions though the voip traffic shows up in the right queues at LAN and WAN. Need to do some more tests soon but yes, I only used the wizard along with local lan phones as VOIP-Alias.

This would also be useful for me..

But one of the lines can be shaped still right, which is better than none, if VoiP could be forced down the shaped line, UNLESS the shaped line is down, then that'd be fine.

@dvserg:

May be possable adding more (2-3) specific wizards to pfSence?

existing wizard per users wizard etc..

Give it a shot.

–Bill

@mwalsh:

I am getting the following error (BETA3-PLUS-11548-PLUS-11567):

Acknowledge All    .:.    04-21-06 07:34:04 - [filter_load]There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qwanRootpfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parents sc/tmp/rules.debug:31: errors in queue definitionpfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qlanRootpfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parents sc/tmp/rules.debug:32: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [ the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qwanRootpfctl]:      .:.

I have tried re-running the traffic shaper and have reduced the Voip settings to almost nothing but I am still getting it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Make sure you put the correct bandwidth in for up/down speeds on the second screen in the wizard.

–Bill

PS. Beta 4 is out, older releases are unsupported

@nima.m:

In Traffic Shaper section, When you press the button "Remove Wizard" or pressing the tab "EZ Shaper wizard"
it will remove your existing shaper rules and queue completely.

Can you please put a messagebox asking the user if they really want to proceed before doing that ?
During the last 3 days, I pressed those button/tab by accident many times and was forced to begin from the beginning.

EZ Shaper wizard does have this warning (don't click next before reading the text on the screen!).  The other item we can put a javascript warning on I 'spose.

–Bill

@hadi57:

hi,

one of my clients is able to use limewire after i setup the trafic shaper, how to stop limewire please?

thank you

Unsurprising.  It's a shaper, not a blocker.

–Bill

Can't do that, get lots of error when I do that,

To make it easier for understand, I changed back the name of my queues to the orginal name and sending the picture
and my config file agian in this message.
What do you think I should do now ?

Untitled-1.gif
Untitled-1.gif_thumb
Untitled-1.gif_thumb
TrafficShaper.xml.txt

That connection belongs to the same state and will be treated the same way  like the outgoing request.

@basset:

Oh …

Sorry about that ... I'm getting the latest from CVS now.

Blaiming newbie status for this  :-[

Basset
[/quote]

HEAD is not meant to be consumed by non-developers.  You should be running code in the RELENG_1 branch.  Better yet, unless you find a bug that has been fixed post release, you should really run a released binary.  We can't and won't support anything else.  I'm marking this thread solved.  Thanks

–Bill

Search the forum, this has been asked and answered before.

It's up to you to set your bandwidth limit. 20% might have been a bit conservative. However, I recommend running some bandwidth test with the shaper turned off first. Test upstream and downstream. I have not yet seen a line that had exact the advertised speed. Some are a bit slower, some even a bit faster. Don't trust your provider  ;)
In case your line is slower than advertised and you use the advertised values shaping won't be successful when reaching your lines limit.

cool. thanks

I think what he's looking for is a way to monitor the total throughput for the month….possibly auto-throttle at a certain usage amount so that he doesn't go over on his usage.....ie you get 100gb/month transfer limit then pay large amounts per gig after that.

@billm:

If I work it that way, you OK with bandwidth disappearing if HFSC is selected as the scheduler?
This convo might be better off on the dev list, I don't check the forums that often :)

–Bill

Ok.. I'll move this to the dev list later today when I wake up  :).