• MOVED: balance/failover with 3 ISPs (DSL+T1+CableModem)

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • High Latency

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    Z

    @hoba:

    my adsl2+ 16mbit/s down, 1 mbit/s up

    plots digging a trench and installing network to hoba's house

  • Queue name BUG

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    May be need insert Queue ID - unique field, what create self value only with new Queue?
    Value format can be, for example, 'queueXX'
    All rules must be use this field for references to this queue.
    This really?

  • Test ALTQ shaping in bridge

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    S

    Feel free to submit patches against -HEAD to get this included.

  • Forwarded ports

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    S

    Sorry, It was a notice mostly for users not developers.
    After syncing with RELENG_1 cvs everything works fine. Outgoing traffic shaping too. Thanks.

  • Allowed Client bandwidth Based from Radius accept message…

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    B

    Nor can we sync dummynet rules to ALTQ :)  No, this will require significantly more effort.

    –Bill

  • Dummy shaping?

    Locked
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    D

    Thks. I shall try several tests

    Use it at your own risk, no support will be given, yadda, yadda.

    Yes, I understand that this quits of frames of the project.

    But i very much need for filtering bridge & shaper
    May be there is other way for join 2 subnets one range? Without use the bridge, but filtering and shaping traffic?
    This structure to my network
    (10.62.0.0/24: 10.62.0.1-inet router + about 10 hosts) <-WAN intf-> pfSense <- LAN intf -> (10.62.0.0/24: all other hosts)
    All traffic between left and right subnets can be go without any nat but any protocols i want directing with rules & shaping

    Any advice(idea)?

  • Q. Bandwith Management

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H

    First run the shaper to get a basic config. Then create queues for all the servers with an upperlimit of 5,2,1,2 mbit/s. Add rules that assign each server IP to one of the queues.

    To get started "abuse" the voipqueue for one of the servers (enter the Server IP at the VOIP page when running the Wizard). After the wizard has finished uncheck the realtime and add an upperlimit instead to the created voipqueues. Also lowering the priority makes sense. Then create a pair of these rules for each of your servers. Apply the settings and reset states before you test your new config.

  • Traffic shaper wizard broken

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    B

    @datafirm:

    Still seeing issues on latest releng_1.  Can you post to this thread once a fix has been committed.

    Thank you!

    Hmmm, we commit'd something yesterday.  I'll see what more needs to be done.

    –Bill

  • Tunneled traffic shaping?

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    H

    I'm not too convonced that this is working under all conditions though the voip traffic shows up in the right queues at LAN and WAN. Need to do some more tests soon but yes, I only used the wizard along with local lan phones as VOIP-Alias.

  • Attempting Traffic Shaping on multiple interfaces.

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    S

    This would also be useful for me..

    But one of the lines can be shaped still right, which is better than none, if VoiP could be forced down the shaped line, UNLESS the shaped line is down, then that'd be fine.

  • Individual Traffic Shaping for clients

    Locked
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    B

    @dvserg:

    May be possable adding more (2-3) specific wizards to pfSence?

    existing wizard per users wizard etc..

    Give it a shot.

    –Bill

  • Odd Error

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    B

    @mwalsh:

    I am getting the following error (BETA3-PLUS-11548-PLUS-11567):

    Acknowledge All    .:.    04-21-06 07:34:04 - [filter_load]There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qwanRootpfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parents sc/tmp/rules.debug:31: errors in queue definitionpfctl: the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qlanRootpfctl: linkshare sc exceeds parents sc/tmp/rules.debug:32: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [ the sum of the child bandwidth higher than parent qwanRootpfctl]:      .:.

    I have tried re-running the traffic shaper and have reduced the Voip settings to almost nothing but I am still getting it.

    Any help would be greatly appreciated

    Make sure you put the correct bandwidth in for up/down speeds on the second screen in the wizard.

    –Bill

    PS. Beta 4 is out, older releases are unsupported

  • Feature Request: adding a messagebox warning in traffic shaper

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    B

    @nima.m:

    In Traffic Shaper section, When you press the button "Remove Wizard" or pressing the tab "EZ Shaper wizard"
    it will remove your existing shaper rules and queue completely.

    Can you please put a messagebox asking the user if they really want to proceed before doing that ?
    During the last 3 days, I pressed those button/tab by accident many times and was forced to begin from the beginning.

    EZ Shaper wizard does have this warning (don't click next before reading the text on the screen!).  The other item we can put a javascript warning on I 'spose.

    –Bill

  • Limewire is still connecting

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    B

    @hadi57:

    hi,

    one of my clients is able to use limewire after i setup the trafic shaper, how to stop limewire please?

    thank you

    Unsurprising.  It's a shaper, not a blocker.

    –Bill

  • Can someone look at my Traffic Shaping configuration

    Locked
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    5k Views
    N

    Can't do that, get lots of error when I do that,

    To make it easier for understand, I changed back the name of my queues to the orginal name and sending the picture
    and my config file agian in this message.
    What do you think I should do now ?

    Untitled-1.gif
    Untitled-1.gif_thumb
    Untitled-1.gif_thumb
    TrafficShaper.xml.txt

  • Feature Request: option to show Queues in Bytes (and bits)

    Locked
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2k Views
    No one has replied
  • Still having problems with shaping…

    Locked
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    8k Views
    H

    That connection belongs to the same state and will be treated the same way  like the outgoing request.

  • Erros in rules when using the wizard (BETA3)

    Locked
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    4k Views
    B

    @basset:

    Oh …

    Sorry about that ... I'm getting the latest from CVS now.

    Blaiming newbie status for this  :-[

    Basset
    [/quote]

    HEAD is not meant to be consumed by non-developers.  You should be running code in the RELENG_1 branch.  Better yet, unless you find a bug that has been fixed post release, you should really run a released binary.  We can't and won't support anything else.  I'm marking this thread solved.  Thanks

    –Bill

  • Ip Base Traffic shaping

    Locked
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    H

    Search the forum, this has been asked and answered before.

Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.