Were you able to resolve this?

For clarification the fact it shows as unregistered on the registration page is unrelated to not being able to pull in packages. It is correctly shown as an eligible device on the System Update page so should see pkgs if it's able to reach the pkg repos.

If you're still seeing it try running at the CLI: pkg-static -d update and see what error it returns.

Steve

8200max
2 Protectli FW6E and 1 Zotac ZBOX CI662 Nano in a Proxmox cluster.
1 Mac Mini Intel
2 QNAP TVS-h1288X NAS

Power cable of netgate unit was dangling as it was freshly installed ;)

69810040066__597B7506-AB09-4FB8-AFAF-C97D5E5F3CD7.png

@stephenw10 here in australia, its only really in the last few years that properties are upgrading to 1gbps internet connections as previously 100 would have been considered good.

In addition, guests are only now seeming to stream and cast, rather than use the tv systems provided by the hotels.

We are seeing a lot more throughput now, but nothing like other countries like America.

But there is often a lot of scope creep where they want a simple network, and then they add on cameras, iptv, admin networks, public networks, zigbee, etc...

So its important that i don't run out of routing and switching hence why I'm trying to read up about the new models.

But it seems from the feedback that the 8200 is very capable, even though it looks like a desktop style router.

Not needing VPN, ipsec, or any b2b configurations, we don't really need the expandability of the 1537 for now, so i think the 8200 seems like the smart choice

In the 2100 the SFP combo port has very limited configuration. It will appear as a 1000baseSX link whatever is connected to it:

[admin@2100-2.stevew.lan]/root: ifconfig -vvm mvneta0 mvneta0: flags=8a43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,ALLMULTI,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=800bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE> capabilities=804bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,LRO,LINKSTATE> ether 00:e0:ed:b6:13:59 inet6 fe80::2e0:edff:feb6:1359%mvneta0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 172.21.16.220 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.21.16.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX <full-duplex>) status: active supported media: media autoselect media 1000baseSX mediaopt full-duplex media 1000baseSX media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex,master media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex media 1000baseT mediaopt master media 1000baseT media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex media 100baseTX media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex media 10baseT/UTP media none nd6 options=23<PERFORMNUD,ACCEPT_RTADV,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>

So it will either work or not with no real options tweak if it doesn't.

Steve

@stephenw10 That said... I have an 1100 out in the field plugged into a Netgear GS110TP and it works without issues.

Standards-compliant hardware will not pass power. YMMV when using hardware that isn't one of the 10-15 major manufacturers but if they state that the hardware follows the 802.3af/at/bt standards then you really should be fine.

@steveits Gotcha. I never realized that the 1100 has a switch.

@integrityrv In general yes. If the source had a built in switch (1100/2100/3100) you might need to have Netgate support convert the config for you which they will do for free. Otherwise it will ask to assign interfaces during the restore. The new one must be the same or later pfSense version.

@rustydusty1717 said in SG-3100 OPT1:

I see this currently:

mvneta2 (WAN)
mvneta1 (LAN)

and then I do have a mvneta0 - is this the opt1 port?

Yes
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/sg-3100/io-ports.html

Did you import a config? Or May delete the interface?

@stephenw10 Thank you!!! Problem resolved!!!!!

I have the drive we fitted to various devices which unhelpfully shown as 'NT-32'.

There are a few threads here with other users reporting the drives they used in 5100s. I don't really have anything I can recommend personally.

You should be able to do it either way but I would also do the firmware update first. If only because the vast majority of updates will have been done (successfully) in 22.05.

Steve

@rloeb I started this thread and suggest closing it :-)

Tech support was very prompt in providing me with a USB firmware recovery image for the 5100, which installed easily and then upgraded the installed packages. Been working very well since then. Upgraded last night to the new Snort and pfblockerng packages and everything is copacetic. Rare to find a tech support team that responsive!

Re-reading this if it actually says that on the System > Update page rather than the System > Register page you should open a support ticket:
https://www.netgate.com/tac-support-request

All Netgate hardware should be automatically enabled for updates. Some older devices might require intervention though as they predate the introduction of the NDI.

Steve

@bmeeks True! This happens when one is "new" to pfsense.

c914ae12-8147-489f-a96b-31228e8fe89c-image.png

a77d129a-e93b-4848-a5c8-a3f3476a192d-image.png

Quick update. Replacement one arrived and I am done with the basic config. It appears to be quicker responding when applying configs. etc. On the other one it could take 3 - 5 seconds to apply a config change (or cause the webadmin to crash).

Will see if I have the DNS Resolver crash on me again.

@testcb00 the 6100 has a Max version with an SSD: https://shop.netgate.com/collections/desktop-appliances/products/6100-max-pfsense

Required/recommended for some packages with lots of logging: https://www.netgate.com/supported-pfsense-plus-packages

@luckman212 Yeah I got it too but was expecting it. Early models had a small EFI partition apparently (run “gpart show” and it’ll be either 800K or 200M…the latter I think is all ZFS installs). But that ends at a Marvell> console prompt so not quite as described.

If it was that, or an interrupted install, firmware reinstall is the solution.

Netgate has paused online upgrades to the 1100/2100 models. Per other posts this weekend they haven’t been able to duplicate it themselves.

For reference, the pfBlockerNG issue is fixed - currently waiting on the new version to be available. The DHCP GUI issue will also be fixed - track the issue here.

@m7infratec I actually just went through it so I know it's frustrating. But per other posts Netgate can't seem to replicate it, and obviously no one encountering it had installed the beta/RC. At least recovery isn't too bad, just need the image file and a 5GB+ USB stick.