I would run dmesg then connect the 1100 console then run dmesg again and look at what was added. Or you can probably use System Profiler to get the USB device details but I have nothing to check that on right now.

Hmm, that's weird. Is it a separate interface? What did you set the gateway to?

Thanks Jimp

Yes some things require the actual admin/root account, not just an account with admin privileges. Packet captures for example.

@stephenw10 said in Package weight SG-4100: No that's fine for the actual core temperature. Thank you stephenw10

@mm404 Request the firmware from us and reinstall form the image -- that's the best way to make sure the system is clean. The image you get from us will be directly written to your storage media in the 2100.

the olny thing that scares me is these switch lagg ports, @tjabas They're not that bad. Just be willing to ask here for help and we'll be nearby.

@robbiett said in Trade-In Program?: @defenderllc I got mine from a guy who was doing exactly that - a move from a 6100 to 8200. ️ Sounds like you need another one to setup HA!

@winksaville said in Netgate 1100 with LAN + OPT switch only partially working: Therefore I'd expect those two ports to always be operational, no matter which port is occupied when. Well, yeah. This guid https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/solutions/sg-1100/configuring-the-switch-ports.html - for me - should do what you want : By default, LAN and OPT are two separated interfaces. You want them to be 'switched' : The final blue note now applies : Unlike software bridging, traffic between ports 1 and 2 will never leave the switch chip so it will perform at switching speed. The firewall cannot filter traffic between the two ports as pfSense Plus software will never see it, as with any other (external) switch. What happens when you connect you alternate a device / cable to these two devices : I don't know. Btw : what did you saw in the DHCP server log ? Does the device get the same IP assigned upon connect to each of these ports ? There should only be on interface listed under DHCP-server tab : the 'LAN' as you only have now just one network. This network is set to 192.168.1.1/24, right ? A last resort : Boot to default. Do what the guide says. Now reboot.

Yes, port VLAN mode is more like an unmanaged switch, everything is passed to everything. Though it can be configured as multiple separate switches. Unlikely you'd every do that with only 4 ports. 802.1Q mode is like most managed switches and ports can be configured as trunk (tagged) or access (untagged) within that. Steve

Yes, just back it up from the gui in Diag > Backup/Restore. That's why the config is all stored in on xml file.

The issue has been resolved VERY quickly by a competent member of the Netgate TAC support team. Many thanks at this point! SteveITS was right about the hardware changes. The problem was that I bought the 7100 box from a German distributor and ordered an additional 4x1GBe PCIe card. This card was installed by the distributor, so the NDI changed. The distributor did not re-register the box with the new NDI before shipping it to me. Since this was the first software update for this box, the problem surfaced now. Thanks again for the help on this forum and to the TAC support team! BR, Ulli.

@rcoleman-netgate said in New Netgate 6100 device no TAC Lite: @defenderllc Nothing should happen - the update checks send the serial number as well. But if it does -- open a ticket. Thanks man. I won’t ask for this again if I end up buying an 8200 when they come back in stock. I’d like the extra cores and RAM.

@roci yeah any AP would work.. even some old wifi router being used as just an AP, turn off its dhcp server and connect it the network via one of its lan interfaces. What I would suggest if your in the market for an AP, is get something your sure you can do vlans with - even if your not doing anything with vlans today, you never know what tomorrow will bring. There are many people around here that use the unifi AP.. and while I am very happy with mine - they work great, and have had no issues with them. When it comes time to move to AX or beyond that - not sure if will stick with them.. Not a fan that their AX models only have a 1 gig interface.. Unless you get the 6 enterprise model which isn't all that cheap. And getting frustrated with lack of tls 1.3 in their controller software, and failure to update the ssh version on their AP that still old version from 2020 still.. This has fallen behind in cipher support, etc. None of these things are show stoppers, still very happy with the AP I have and their performance and features for the price I paid, etc. But little things are starting to add up that might me to look else where when it comes to updating my current AP.. Which is still a way down the road..

That looks like an eMMC failure. You should open a ticket with us if you have not already: https://www.netgate.com/tac-support-request Steve

The solution and what made this work in the end was me finding a misconfiguration in the SG-2100 switch. I had sadly missed to add the vlan I needed to use to the port I was connected to, therefore not seeing the tags. //

@sjcjonker said in Netgate 4100 - Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode: At least I can decommission the Raspberry-PI doing console logging. Wait A syslogger is always a nice thing to have. I'm using one : my NAS. When things go downhill, chances are great that logging accelerates. And when you finally take a look at the "what when who where" you'll notice that the interesting events were just rotated into /dev/null

@viragomann said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config: @furom said in Problems with Proxmox/vlan-tagging/SG-2100 Switch config: I tried a laptop in a switch port for the same VLAN I set for the VM, and although it per definition is getting it untagged, The switch port, which is connected to Proxmox is a trunk with tagged VLANs as I understood so far. If so and you connect a device to it, you have to configure its NIC for VLAN. Can you post your interface settings of pfSense, please? Status > Interfaces Which interface did you run the packet capture? I got it working (!) while composing the answer to you! Thanks a lot!! It turned out to be a misconfiguration on the 2100-switch after all, I had not added the vlan to the port I am using... Having done that it now works as it is supposed to. This feels really great, and I am sorry for all the trouble, but very grateful for such a great forum and to all that has tried (and) helped! Thanks !

@steveits six of one, half dozen of the other. Redmine allows for interaction and feedback though.