Включите логирование и посмотрите.

In the end I didnt flash. I dont have the low clock speed issue. I also have a different board layout to the screenshots posted on the other forum, so I think my board revision is different, the bios may still be compatible but given I dont have the locked low clocked speeds, it would mostly be a "nice to have" thing for me rather than a necessity.

I am still fighting with StrongVPN. I have managed to get the tunnel up, inasmuch as I received the message: "Initialization Sequence Completed". I have read that this means that the handshake between VPN server and client is  OK. Immediately thereafter, however, the VPN bombs. Here is a log transcript. Might a good soul tell me what I am doing that is wrong? Thanks in advance! (Note that the newest entry is on the top.) Apr 14 20:07:01 openvpn 56391 SIGTERM[soft,exit-with-notification] received, process exiting Apr 14 20:07:01 openvpn 56391 /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown ovpnc2 1500 1546 10.8.0.86 10.8.0.85 init Apr 14 20:07:01 openvpn 56391 Closing TUN/TAP interface Apr 14 20:07:01 openvpn 56391 /sbin/route delete -net 10.8.0.81 10.8.0.85 255.255.255.255 Apr 14 20:07:01 openvpn 56391 TCP/UDP: Closing socket Apr 14 20:06:59 openvpn 56391 SIGTERM received, sending exit notification to peer Apr 14 20:06:59 openvpn 56391 event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4) Apr 14 20:06:56 openvpn 56391 Authenticate/Decrypt packet error: cipher final failed Apr 14 20:06:47 openvpn 56391 Authenticate/Decrypt packet error: cipher final failed Apr 14 20:06:37 openvpn 56391 Authenticate/Decrypt packet error: cipher final failed Apr 14 20:06:36 openvpn 56391 Initialization Sequence Completed

I removed these lines: <loader readonly='yes' type='pflash' format='raw'>/usr/share/qemu/ovmf-x64/OVMF_CODE-pure-efi-tpm.fd</loader> <nvram format='raw'>/etc/libvirt/qemu/nvram/384971b7-7248-55e4-dd68-caa71cda114f_VARS-pure-efi-tpm.fd</nvram> So it defaulted to BIOS and now it always works

Not yet, we are testing internally. There will be some announcement when we have an RC snap ready for testing. Steve

@pantigon did you have any luck with cx255?

@Nova9 said in [HOWTO] Captive portal + FreeRADIUS + local MySQL user friendly single step: Maybe the .js files aren't loading properly? Use the right button of your mouse. Every browser will give you the possibility to see the 'html source of the web page. You'll be seeing in a split second if resource files like css and js files are not load, most of the time because they have another file on the system name. Btw : The subject "Captive portal + FreeRADIUS + local MySQL user friendly single step:" is a rather big project. Nothing something that can be pulled of 'ASAP'. Using an old pfSense version gives you a new feature : you created a security time bomb.

Hello Sir, We currently use the bind pfsense. We are satisfied with the product, but we still have some things to clarify. I wish to make the declaration of a zone reverse type: For example: zone "80/20.30.40.90.in-addr.arpa" { xxxx, } But unfortunately the pfsense bind interface does not accept this kind of statement with a "/" and returns me an error message (syntax error?) How I should do this type of statement without getting an error message? Sincerly, k. Shekohivand

I updated to 21.05 too, had no problems updating. Also applied the patch. Thanks for the help!

@stephenw10 It is too early to tell but my internet fell-over today so multiple disconnects and re-connection attempts... ...and the router didn't crash. There is hope. ️

Anycast is a routing method for sending traffic to the nearest servers using the same IP. So here when you connect to 1.1.1.1 it goes to the closest servers. And when you connect to it over a VPN it goes to the closest servers to the other end of the VPN. That's important because if you check the resolve location it appears to be close the VPN location which is your source IP. Differences there can be used to detect connections using a VPN.

@dgcom: I perfectly understand implications of this particular issue, and yes - it is not just a matter of replacing openssl executable… What I am saying is that recompiling everything is not very efficient. But, I guess, you know your product :) … @dgcom: shouldn't build system be smart enough to recompile only if dependencies changed? the build system is, but the system is packaged in a way that is a forklift upgrade on every update. We're exploring ways to update differently (such that updates are more like freebsd-update), but even here there are impacts that you might not imagine. PBIs are dead after 2.2, btw. @dgcom: I, personally, do not run anything, based on recent versions of openssl - except pfSense. this is probably mistake at this point.

hi, here we can find some refurbished Dell EMC SD-WAN Edge 620, for a very interesting price. But i don't know if they are "unlocked", they say in the description that "No DNOS Installed", and "Supports Native Linux OS provided by the VNF partners. Supports KVM or ESXi hypervisors". so do you think that we can easily install pfsense on it ? EDIT: on a deleted message in reddit someone said : Dell EMC SD-WAN Edge 604 is a C3758 CPU It uses the same Motherboard as the VEP-1445. However if you change the OS, it will boot loop. You must install the BIOS from the VEP-1445 onto the SD WAN if you want your own OS. To Flash the BIOS you need to first flash the Dell Recovery OS from the VEP-1445 to the eMMC of the SD-WAN. Once booted to the recovery OS you can then flash BIOS. EDIT 2 : look at that : https://www.etb-tech.com/dell-emc-vep1425-switch6-x-1gb-rj45-2-x-10gb-sfp-sw02212.html Licenses Installed : OPNsense 19.7.10.1 Installed

Hmm, OK. Since you have a screenshot does that mean it did boot correctly after that? Or did you roll back the driver to get that?