Subcategories

  • Discussions about packages which handle caching and proxy functions such as squid, lightsquid, squidGuard, etc.

    4k Topics
    21k Posts
    E
    I even tried deleting and creating a new certificate. Any suggestions?
  • Discussions about packages whose functions are Intrusion Detection and Intrusion Prevention such as snort, suricata, etc.

    2k Topics
    16k Posts
    bmeeksB
    @NRgia said in Suricata on Pfsense: Your suggestion is preferred, but from I understood from you, nobody is interested or have the knowledge. Again thank you, for updating this package over the years. I'm sure there is someone here on the forum using the package that has the knowledge to maintain it. Another option if IDS/IPS is critical is to use the Linux package on a separate virtual machine or hardware appliance. Inline IPS performance would actually be very good using a Linux box (or even a FreeBSD box) with two separate NICs and configure true netmap hardware-to-hardware mode. That is many times more performant than the hardware-to-host mode that is required when using netmap within pfSense. Of course using a separate box would mean no GUI, but that's how the vast majority of the world uses Suricata already (without a GUI).
  • Discussions about packages that handle bandwidth and network traffic monitoring functions such as bandwidtd, ntopng, etc.

    572 Topics
    3k Posts
    keyserK
    @Antibiotic No it’s not possible with NtopNG as it is not a Netflow collector. You need nProbe for that which will “translate” recieved netflows into flows that NtopNG understands and can visualize (with very very little detail might I add as Netflows has no additonal information apart from sender/reciever and volume). The NtopNG package and the product in general is more geared towards visualising and recording traffic details from actual packet captures. This contains MUCH more metadata about the sessions than netflows (DNS names, protocol information and myriads of other things). But pffSense Plus has a builtin Netflow exporter if you have an external netflow collector on hand.
  • Discussions about the pfBlockerNG package

    3k Topics
    20k Posts
    W
    I want to share my experience and, hopefully, help you with your problem. For a long time, I also faced the fact that sites loaded incredibly slowly due to domain blocking via pfblockerNG together with my local Pi-hole DNS servers. And, frankly speaking, I was already starting to think that I would have to put up with this forever. But after a little experimentation, I managed to significantly speed up page loading! The solution turned out to be simple, but brilliant - configure pfblockerNG and Pi-hole so that they return "empty" responses instead of waiting for a timeout. Thanks to this, the browser stopped constantly trying to load blocked domains, and the network speed increased noticeably. What is especially nice is that this solution worked on all devices in my network, including mobile phones and tablets, without the need to install any extensions for Firefox or Chrome. As a result, my system works smoothly: Squid caches, SSL is filtered, ClamAV checks, and sites open instantly. Setting this up was a bit of a pain, but the results exceeded all expectations - finally a feeling of complete control and stability of the network!
  • Discussions about Network UPS Tools and APCUPSD packages for pfSense

    101 Topics
    2k Posts
    dennypageD
    @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: Interesting. I would have thought the initial reboot, which occurred as part of the upgrade, would have done the trick, but it took a second reboot, just now, to get things working. Glad you have it sorted. There was no difference in the output of usbconfig show_ifdrv at any point -- before or after unplugging/replugging the USB cable, nor after rebooting. ... Question: What would tell me whether or not a driver was loaded? If there were an attached driver, it should have shown up with the show_ifdrv command. If you use the command and look at the other usb devices, I think they will show attached drivers. I don't expect to see a driver attached to the ups, because there is a quirk that tells the OS to ignore that device (and not attach a driver). Look for idVendor and idProduct in the above output. The Vendor ID for your device is 0764, which corresponds to Cyber Power Systems, and the Product ID for your device is 0601, which is registered as "PR1500LCDRT2U UPS" (don't sweat an exact match for the name). You can see the quirk with the following command: [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: usbconfig dump_device_quirks | grep 0764 VID=0x0764 PID=0x0005 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0501 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE VID=0x0764 PID=0x0601 REVLO=0x0000 REVHI=0xffff QUIRK=UQ_HID_IGNORE [25.07-RC][root@fw]/root: Your device is third on the list. The HID_IGNORE quirk says to ignore the device and not attach a driver. @jhg said in NUT fails to start after 2.7.2 -> 2.8.0 upgrade: You might consider adding this resolution to the release notes for 2.8. LOL... sorry, I don't have input to the release notes (I don't work here). While I wrote and maintain various packages, including NUT, I'm still just a volunteer. Most packages are actually written by volunteers.
  • Discussions about the ACME / Let’s Encrypt package for pfSense

    501 Topics
    3k Posts
    A
    Hi, Please help to forward / report the bugs in ACME 1.0 package. Thanks.
  • Discussions about the FRR Dynamic Routing package on pfSense

    295 Topics
    1k Posts
    J
    Anyone else happen to notice that when configuring BFD, if you create a peer and select a profile - after save, re-edit the peer and the Profile is not represented. It appears as "None". You have to check the raw config to determine if the profile was actually assigned to the peer. This is on 2.8.1 (all packages up to date as of the date/time of this post). UPDATE: if re-edit and save (without re-configuring the profile none to what you want) - the save will strip the profile from the peer.
  • Discussions about the Tailscale package

    91 Topics
    611 Posts
    T
    Hi All, I use HAProxy to redirect to a range of https internal resources, this works really well at the moment through the WAN where I have source limits set up, and I can connect to the internal resources from limited external IP Addresses. Given I have tailscale I would like to basically be able to put custom dns entries in to point these hostnames to my pfsense tailscale IP4 address (100.89.148.118) but I am not having any luck getting this working. At the moment, I am just trying to connect to HAProxy using https://100.89.148.118 but it is getting blocked by the firewall. Sep 11 11:55:58 tailscale0 Default deny rule IPv4 (1000000103) 100.89.148.10:53148 100.89.148.118:443 TCP:S I have tried with and without NAT redirecting internally to 127.0.0.1, and I also have rules set up to allow any traffic to and from my tailnets (defined in an alias) but I still keep getting these connections from my other tailscale machines being blocked on the pfsense machine. Can someone give me some pointers on what I am missing because I can see the requests are coming through to the pfsense machine, and in theory the rules should allow it through but I cant see why they don't. I do have tailscale ACL in place, but clearly that is not an issue as the requests are making it through to the firewall. 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP TailNets * TailNets * * none Allow across Tailnets 0/0 B IPv4+6 TCP/UDP * * * 443 (HTTPS) * none Allow Tailscale IP4 I also tried adding a EasyRule but because the tailscale0 interface doesn't exist in pfsense it throws an error and won't let me add that rule. Appreciate any help or tips, Cheers.
  • Discussions about WireGuard

    701 Topics
    4k Posts
    QuantumParadoxQ
    I am on PFsense Plus 25.07.1 and I am trying to setup my VPN's wireguard and at first it worked now it will not. Once I set up WireGuard for the first time, it all worked. I could toggle on and off the WireGuard and everything would work as it should, so I made a backup of the system. A few days later, after I rebooted PFsense, the writeguard came on but it disabled the Unbound DNS. and when I went to enable it, I still would not get any traffic. Once I disable Wireguard, I'll get internet again. I went and reinstalled the backup and same thing, it does not work. The VPN I am using is TORguard, and I had the techs from TORguard remotely into my machine to set it up, and they have the same issue. they can ping their VPN traffic out and they can Ping my IPS traffic but there is a bug with switching between the two. Can anyone on here help me with this?
  • Squidguard / does not allow ip address in url

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • [PATCH] siproxd patch for static WAN behind NAT

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    825 Views
    No one has replied
  • Captive portal - is it me or is this product not ready?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    893 Views
    bmeeksB
    Hi Miles: I'm not a captive portal user or maintainer, but there is a dedicated forum for it here:  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?board=2.0 Someone in there might be able to help.  You may have tried there already, and if so just ignore this post. Bill
  • Trying squid but can't even block a domain

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    615 Views
    No one has replied
  • PfBlocker Alias log problems

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    BBcan177B
    @splmachine: That rule was exactly what I needed, Thanks. Now I can match up rule number with the actual rule. One last thing though, looking in the log settings I have raw logging enabled, and most of the options enabled. Is there a way to have the logging show pfBlockerAliasName vs something like "Rule 50"? Or is that it? Is Rule 50 one of the Default rules or a pfBlocker Rule? If its a Default rule it will just show the Rule Number. You would most likely leave these three off. Especially the first one as you will get a lot of noise. Log packets blocked by the default rule   Log packets blocked by 'Block Bogon Networks' rules   Log packets blocked by 'Block Private Networks' rules One thing to remember is that if you modify a Rule, it will change the Rule Names in the Firewall log (all will be mismatched). This will hopefully be fixed in 2.2
  • Squid3-dev causes Fatal error: Call to undefined function curl_init()

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Postfix disabled on pfsense upgrade…why?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    760 Views
    marcellocM
    The service is disabled during uninstall/reinstall.
  • NRPE dont_blame_nrpe=1

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    718 Views
    No one has replied
  • Captive portal auth page

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    604 Views
    M
    File manager.  Great.
  • Captive portal vouchers

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    693 Views
    No one has replied
  • LightSquid Problem

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    691 Views
    S
    yesss, for next refers,it was a simple mistake by me,just select lightsquid>setting>Report Scheme (something other than Text) :D [image: 222.PNG] [image: 222.PNG_thumb]
  • Nmap-6.40_2 pkg v1.2 - Failing to Install

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    K
    No worries, upgrading to 2.1.3 has fixed the issue. Must have been something that got changed in the package or the package system. Thanks! Edit: Not sure if it matters, but the error message said something pertaining to a missing nmap.inc, install failed, then the install would gracefully back out and perform the nmap uninstall, removing all nmap components. If I can get the exact error message from an un-updated install I will before I update it.
  • Suricata package blocking mode coming soon

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    4k Views
    bmeeksB
    @BBcan17: Great stuff… This will make testing that much easier!! EDIT: On another note, also having the functionality to create a fresh NEW interface would also be beneficial instead of trying to re-enable all of the previously disabled rules. That functionality is there today with the current (+) icon.  I'm not changing that one.  I will be adding new (+) icons beside each configured interface.  Clicking the (+) beside an already configured interface will perform the DUP function.  The layout will be pretty much just like the firewall rules page.  So the (+) icon at the top right of the tab will create a new fresh interface (just like it does today).  The (+) icon beside an existing configured interface will DUP it. In terms of the rules, on the RULES tab today is an icon that will remove all forced enable/disable changes for all rules on the interface.  This essentially resets the rules to their default state.  There is a similar icon that will do this for only the currently selected category. Bill
  • Suricata - MM/DD/YYYY Log Entry Formating

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    bmeeksB
    @priller: Not "alerts.log" …... "suricata.log".  It uses a different date format from all the other logs. suricata.log 3/5/2014 -- 14:37:21 To match the other logs that should be 5/3/2014, or more specifically 05/03/2014 .  Today being 5/5, it's a bad day to compare the different formats!  ;D alerts.log 05/01/2014-02:38:47.669925 http.log 05/03/2014-17:40:37.873931 tls.log 05/02/2014-07:39:35.069581 Oh…sorry, I understand now.  I will look again in the config docs, but I don't think there is any way to change that outside of editing the actual binary source code.  I can see how much of an issue that would be and perhaps sneak it into the next release when I upgrade to 2.0. Bill
  • Lots of snort alerts after pfsense update to 2.1.2

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    5k Views
    BBcan177B
    Then I am baffled as to why one firewall has the issue while another (supposedly configured the same way) does not.  There would be only two logical explanations:  (1) either they are, in fact, not actually configured the same although they are supposed to be, or (2) you said one was VMware-based, and it is conceivable that VMware's virtual networking could play into the mix with that HTTP_INSPECT alert. Maybe setting up a standalone pfSense install to see if VMWare is the culprit is the best solution to rule out the Virtual machine idiosyncrasys. or a VM machine for the Main Site.
  • Captive Portal issues

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    591 Views
    M
    A simple reboot of the laptop resolved it.  Why would this be the case?
  • Asterisk-1.8.26.1 package on pFsense 2.1.2

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    C
    Tx. I noticed another issue this WE. I took a fresh Asterisk backup and did some config tests. After that I wanted to go back to my backup (as I usually do after testing)…: it restored the backup and initiated a reboot after reboot....it re-installed the Asterisk package again !!!! then I had to restore (again) and it works... Strange behaviour no ?
  • HAPROXY Connection limit

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3k Views
    P
    Seems you have found the wrong forum? pfSense which is based on FreeBSD has nothing to do with CentOS ? You should probably try the haproxy mailing-list for this question, maybe one of the core developers present on that list can help you further: haproxy@formilux.org
  • Suricata 1.4.6 pkg v1.0.1 no alerts, no blocking

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    bmeeksB
    @simby: Hi! i have install Suricata 1.4.6 pkg v1.0.1 with snort. Snort is disabled, suricata is On with AC + blocking. In log i don see any alerts, no blocking. I have tested with grc.com  :(( I have pfsense 2.1.3 x64 Not a good idea at all to run these two packages together on the same firewall.  I would remove the Snort package if you want to use Suricata.  Also, did you select some rules for Suricata to enforce?  You did not mention that in your post.  Oh, and one other point– Suricata really works best only with the Emerging Threats rules.  There are many of the Snort rules that have Snort-specific keywords in them, and these rules will fail to compile on Suricata.  Suricata will start, but it will not use any rules that fail to compile.  This is different from Snort.  If Snort chokes on any rule during compilation, it will not start up.  Go to the Logs Browser tab and examine the suricata.log file for the interface and look for any errors. Bill
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    760 Views
    No one has replied
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.