@stephenw10

No I did not...but I created a ticket...and reinstall pfSense plus again...it's working now....thank you for your response

Mmm, that does seem non-standard. I would be reluctant to connect that to anything but the expected equipment TBH.

@gertjan The backup file didn't work (I had a couple).. I now have a fresh one in two locations (NAS and PC). A new UPS (to be purchased) and standby generator (due here on May 11th) are on my list of things to do.. I guess I will always request a new OS image when they issue one. I didn't have a copy of the latest version (only the config).

@steveits said in Is the SG3100 been abandoned or...:

See https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/10464 (Disallow package updates when a system update is available)

There would be no need for a warning or a rule, if the update was offered, yet left the packages to a specific branch, on the current installed branch. Thanks for the info.

@wc2l It is from the General system logs. At the same time I got notified my server could not ping outside my network.

@netblues I eventually got it up and running. I’m not sure how or why! The LAN IP was not my actual IP address.. I’m using a non routable IP address.

The WAN is setup for DHCP. The info was taken from the console screen. So it was nothing that I have set. I just went through the web setup routine for that part

I could ping the router, but couldn’t get to the web interface. Once it finally woke up or started working, I could get to the interface.

@alric22 a reset to factory defaults by logging in through the console seemed to do the trick.

There are no plans for that in the short term I'm aware of. The switch support would require a number of additions.

Steve

@wblanton Not that it helps, but I mistakenly write LX - I meant SX. My BiDi module reports itself as a 1000Base-SX module.

@steveits said in SG3100 + pfBlockerNG-devel ?:

@mudmanc4 Here is the redmine bug report so you can follow it.

re: what triggers it, from the report certain orders of preg_match() calls can. It seems apparent that the pfSense GUI does not as everything I've seen is in regards to packages. Perhaps the feeds used (variable size) make a difference?

So far so good.

Actions taken in pfblockerNG

1 - Wizard
2 - Maxmind key set
3 - MaxMind Localized Language changed to Brazilian portuguese
Not using geoIP yet, planning to.

4 - Feeds

Noticed that only one DNSBL was in use, ADs_Basic, so I added the following:
. EasyList
. EasyList_Portuguese
. EasyPrivacy

5 - Changed DNSBL Mode to Unbound python mode
6 - Unchecked DNS Reply Logging because I don't need it

03b069f3-5e54-4692-9490-7065bac7d249-image.png

@kitsufan Hi, I hit the same issue. Have you figured out how to get it to work?

Oh, indeed! There's no charge for Plus on our hardware. 👍

@steveits Wrong config. They manually added 127.0.0.1 in DNS and it was there allready

@johnpoz So, you really did manage to put the cart before the horse...
But seriously, you do make a good point about order when needing to make a system change in the middle of an update. I'll note this.

Double the TDP maybe but that does not represent consumption given the same load.

You might consider something with less cores at higher frequency instead.

Steve

If you can test a 21.05 snapshot it should be there already.