• IPSEC perdendo conexão

    Portuguese
    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    DaddyGoD

    @alexandre-angeli said in IPSEC perdendo conexão:

    A IPSEC fica offline enquanto não usa, e comprovei o correto funcionamento, quando pingo ela "levanta" novamente.

    Hmmmm, mas:
    https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/vpn/ipsec/keep-alive.html

  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    4k Views
    jimpJ

    It's not a fatal error, just annoying log spam. No way to suppress it currently.

  • Latest 2.5.0 IPSec Xauth PHP crash

    IPsec
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    659 Views
    B

    Sorted it.

    On line 96 of /etc/inc/ipsec.auth-user.php it reads:

    $userGroups = getUserGroups($username, $authcfg, array());

    Where it should read:

    $userGroups = getUserGroups($username, $authcfg, $attributes = array());

    To abide by PHP referenced variable.

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    446 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSEC with multiple networks

    IPsec
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    569 Views
    jimpJ

    You would use separate P2 entries for each subnet.

    Though you could combine the 172.x.x.x as 172.16.0.0/14 which would cover both 172.17 and 172.18, so long as it doesn't conflict with anything else you are doing.

    Alternately, use routed IPsec then you don't need to worry about tunnel mode policies at all.

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    JeGrJ

    @CodeNinja said in How to setup a second local network for an IPSec connection?:

    I'm also curious if its preferred/best practice to use "supernet" or this "multiple tunnel" construction like i currently do.

    In many bigger scenarios, I see "supernets" or bigger CIDR masks to simplify tunnel deployments. Especially in centralized structures with one or two "main" sites with big uplinks and many small/branch offices network design often tends to do sth. along these lines:

    Roll out big network structure on main(1) -> e.g. multiple 172.19.x.0/24 networks for security segmentation Dial Up / RAS VPN uses IP ranges either from an upper 172.19.x segment or another IP range altogether (e.g. 192.168.vvv.0/24) Branch offices use separate range -> e.g. 10.10.bbb.0/24 for office 1, 10.20.bbb.0/24 for office 2 (or 10.11.bbb.0 if you have a whole lot of branch offices).

    With that setup, you can easily do tunnels from "main" to "site a" with <172.19.0.0/16> <-> <10.10.0.0/16> and have no problem whatsoever to grow in either space. If you have the need for new networks on site or on in the main location - just add another VLAN with /24 and as your tunnel is set up with /16 it already includes the new networks.

    So yeah, pretty common to use CIDR ranges bigger than your local network to add some "space to grow" lateron.

    I also noticed this morning that one of the connection had 8 tunnels where i expected only 4. 5 are duplicates from eachother and 1 is missing..

    That seems strange. A duplicate can (and will) happen at times, when rekeying gets near and the lifetime is about to expire. Then it's pretty normal to sometimes see every phase with a second entry as the old one gets "disabled" (but not disconnected) and the new one takes over so the rekey/lifetime turnaround goes smooth. You then see new traffic accumulate on the newer P2 and the old one won't get any more and after expiry should vanish a few seconds/minutes later. But having the same phase 5 times is strange. And some were brought up only seconds after another. Weird. I'd disconnect the whole bunch and reestablish the tunnel and check if that happens again. Perhaps something with the edgerouter on the other site? Maybe setting the split option in P1 of the connection could help if pfsense tries to group the connection but the edgerouter doesn't support it (fully) - but that's just a guess.

  • Disable NAT on IPSec output

    NAT
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    289 Views
    No one has replied
  • IPSec/NAT

    Portuguese
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    302 Views
    No one has replied
  • VPN IPsec with various Phases 2.

    General pfSense Questions
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    213 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    453 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    I want to make tunneel between pfsense and vps,
    I have no idea how to do that.
    Kindly help

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    483 Views
    C

    More details are in the attached file. I cannot seem to add it here, because it's supposed spam.
    A little frustrating.

    MoreDetails.txt

  • How to setup multiple concurrent L2TP users?

    IPsec
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    409 Views
    M

    I could not find my previous post, I thought it was not posted properly, now I found it but can not remove this one... please Admin, remove it and pardon my mistake

  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    399 Views
    No one has replied
  • Multiple Concurrent VPN connection L2TP/IPsec

    IPsec
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    438 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    629 Views
    DerelictD

    You could send some of that /27 across OpenVPN to the other site if the /27 is routed to you.

    If the interface is a /27 that's going to be much more difficult.

  • IPsec VTI pfSense to UniFi

    IPsec
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    K

    @Konstanti said in IPsec VTI pfSense to UniFi:

    @kriechmaden
    Hi
    ifconfig does not show that the vti tunnel is up (There is no vti tunnel in the list of interfaces, ipsec1000, for example)
    This is the output of ifconfig on my PFSense .
    enc0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1536
    nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
    groups: enc
    lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384
    options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6>
    inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
    inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
    inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
    nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
    groups: lo
    pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160
    groups: pflog
    pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500
    groups: pfsync
    syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 defer: on
    syncok: 1
    ipsec1000: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1400
    tunnel inet 10.3.100.1 --> 10.3.100.100
    inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe02:c8c1%ipsec1000 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
    inet 10.6.106.1 --> 10.6.106.2 netmask 0xfffffffc
    nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
    reqid: 1000
    groups: ipsec

    [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw1]/root: ifconfig vtnet0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c00b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 02:00:00:ef:85:e6 hwaddr 02:00:00:ef:85:e6 inet6 fe80::ff:feef:85e6%vtnet0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet6 XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX::3 prefixlen 64 inet6 XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX::2 prefixlen 64 vhid 3 inet XXX.XXX.XXX.114 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX inet XXX.XXX.XXX.115 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX vhid 5 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex> status: active carp: MASTER vhid 3 advbase 1 advskew 0 carp: MASTER vhid 5 advbase 1 advskew 0 vtnet1: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c00b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 26:88:14:13:f6:c0 hwaddr 26:88:14:13:f6:c0 inet6 fe80::2488:14ff:fe13:f6c0%vtnet1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet6 fd60:fef5:50c0:e3fc::2 prefixlen 64 inet6 fd60:fef5:50c0:e3cf::1 prefixlen 64 vhid 4 inet 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 10.0.3.255 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 10.0.3.255 vhid 1 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex> status: active carp: MASTER vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 0 carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 0 vtnet2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c00b8<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,VLAN_HWTSO,LINKSTATE> ether 72:df:07:2c:37:6b hwaddr 72:df:07:2c:37:6b inet6 fe80::70df:7ff:fe2c:376b%vtnet2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 fdf5:3371:813a:5aac::2 prefixlen 64 inet6 fdf5:3371:813a:5aac::1 prefixlen 64 vhid 7 inet 10.0.8.2 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 10.0.11.255 inet 10.0.8.1 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 10.0.11.255 vhid 6 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T <full-duplex> status: active carp: MASTER vhid 6 advbase 1 advskew 0 carp: MASTER vhid 7 advbase 1 advskew 0 enc0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1536 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: enc lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: lo pflog0: flags=100<PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160 groups: pflog pfsync0: flags=41<UP,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500 groups: pfsync pfsync: syncdev: vtnet1 syncpeer: 10.0.0.3 maxupd: 128 defer: off syncok: 1 ovpns1: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000<LINKSTATE> inet6 fe80::10d4:df6d:5e75:438d%ovpns1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet6 fd75:6d19:84ae:d2c9::1 prefixlen 64 inet 10.0.252.1 --> 10.0.252.2 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: tun openvpn Opened by PID 87483 ovpns2: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000<LINKSTATE> inet6 fe80::10d4:df6d:5e75:438d%ovpns2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 inet6 fd9f:17e9:b703:fb61::1 prefixlen 64 inet 10.0.248.1 --> 10.0.248.2 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: tun openvpn Opened by PID 92953 ovpns3: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000<LINKSTATE> inet6 fe80::10d4:df6d:5e75:438d%ovpns3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa inet6 fd27:dd3e:7e8e:d32e::1 prefixlen 64 inet 10.0.244.1 --> 10.0.244.2 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: tun openvpn Opened by PID 11769 ovpns4: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000<LINKSTATE> inet6 fe80::10d4:df6d:5e75:438d%ovpns4 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb inet6 fd7d:a519:4cbf:b745::1 prefixlen 64 inet 10.255.243.241 --> 10.255.243.242 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> groups: tun openvpn Opened by PID 18031 ipsec1000: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 tunnel inet XXX.XXX.XXX.114 --> XXX.XXX.XXX.253 inet6 fe80::10d4:df6d:5e75:438d%ipsec1000 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc inet 10.252.243.242 --> 10.252.243.243 netmask 0xfffffff0 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> reqid: 1000 groups: ipsec

    Very strange the tunnel is now up and it seems to be working.
    Niw the problem is, that if we ping the other site no response from the host is coming. But on a tcpdum we see, that the ICMP reuqest was received and the echo is send.

    Ping from UniFi to pfSense:

    tcpdump on the pfSense

    [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw1]/root: tcpdump -i ipsec1000 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on ipsec1000, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), capture size 262144 bytes 16:09:14.055108 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51345, length 44 16:09:14.148584 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 997, length 8 16:09:14.248284 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 27647, seq 10, length 64 16:09:14.248326 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 27647, seq 10, length 64 16:09:14.388477 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51346, length 44 16:09:14.568088 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 223, length 64 16:09:14.568148 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 19207, seq 223, length 64 16:09:14.659358 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 998, length 8 16:09:15.055940 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51348, length 44 16:09:15.169418 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 999, length 8 16:09:15.249018 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 27647, seq 11, length 64 16:09:15.249038 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 27647, seq 11, length 64 16:09:15.389457 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51349, length 44 16:09:15.569286 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 224, length 64 16:09:15.569363 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 19207, seq 224, length 64 16:09:15.690172 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1000, length 8 16:09:16.057022 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51351, length 44 16:09:16.227717 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1001, length 8 16:09:16.248121 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 27647, seq 12, length 64 16:09:16.248179 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 27647, seq 12, length 64 16:09:16.390299 IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51352, length 44 16:09:16.578063 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 225, length 64 16:09:16.578156 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 19207, seq 225, length 64 16:09:16.764230 IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1002, length 8 ^C 24 packets captured 24 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw1]/root: tcpdump -i enc0 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on enc0, link-type ENC (OpenBSD encapsulated IP), capture size 262144 bytes 16:09:22.578118 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc24b31ec: IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 231, length 64 16:09:22.578170 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 19207, seq 231, length 64 16:09:23.049116 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1014, length 8 16:09:23.054739 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51372, length 44 16:09:23.247988 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc24b31ec: IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 27647, seq 19, length 64 16:09:23.248049 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 27647, seq 19, length 64 16:09:23.388236 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51373, length 44 16:09:23.563408 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1015, length 8 16:09:23.577872 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc24b31ec: IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 232, length 64 16:09:23.577917 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo reply, id 19207, seq 232, length 64 16:09:24.055579 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP ip114.ip-51-75-157.eu > 10.1.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 34846, seq 51375, length 44 16:09:24.077415 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc7901687: IP 10.252.243.242 > 10.252.243.243: ICMP echo request, id 2268, seq 1016, length 8 ^C 12 packets captured 12 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel

    ping command on the UniFi site:

    device-admin@USG-PRO1:~$ ping 10.252.243.242 PING 10.252.243.242 (10.252.243.242) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C^C --- 10.252.243.242 ping statistics --- 31 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 30050ms device-admin@USG-PRO1:~$ ping 10.252.243.243 PING 10.252.243.243 (10.252.243.243) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.252.243.243: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.146 ms 64 bytes from 10.252.243.243: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.125 ms 64 bytes from 10.252.243.243: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms 64 bytes from 10.252.243.243: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=0.113 ms ^C --- 10.252.243.243 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.113/0.133/0.148/0.014 ms

    Ping from pfSense to UniFi:

    tcpdump on UniFi:

    root@USG-PRO1:~# tcpdump -i vti64 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on vti64, link-type RAW (Raw IP), capture size 262144 bytes 16:11:21.689119 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 350, length 64 16:11:22.688719 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 351, length 64 16:11:23.689212 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 352, length 64 16:11:24.688916 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 353, length 64 16:11:25.690202 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 354, length 64 16:11:26.699178 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 355, length 64 16:11:27.699096 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 356, length 64 16:11:28.699099 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 357, length 64 16:11:29.709125 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 358, length 64 16:11:30.709099 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 359, length 64 16:11:31.719095 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 360, length 64 16:11:32.720917 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 361, length 64 16:11:33.729182 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 362, length 64 16:11:34.739091 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 363, length 64 16:11:35.739018 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 364, length 64 16:11:36.739108 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 365, length 64 16:11:37.749104 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 366, length 64 16:11:38.749143 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 367, length 64 16:11:39.749049 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 368, length 64 16:11:40.759056 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 369, length 64 16:11:41.759098 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 370, length 64 16:11:42.759097 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 371, length 64 16:11:43.759065 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 372, length 64 16:11:44.759087 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 373, length 64 16:11:45.759073 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 374, length 64 16:11:46.759099 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 375, length 64 16:11:47.760307 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 376, length 64 16:11:48.772532 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 377, length 64 16:11:49.779243 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 378, length 64 16:11:50.789094 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 379, length 64 16:11:51.789082 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 380, length 64 16:11:52.789099 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 381, length 64 16:11:53.789073 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 382, length 64 16:11:54.789129 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 383, length 64 16:11:55.788908 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 384, length 64 16:11:56.788971 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 385, length 64 16:11:57.789097 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 386, length 64 16:11:58.789057 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 387, length 64 16:11:59.789097 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 388, length 64 16:12:00.789103 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 389, length 64 16:12:01.789119 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 390, length 64 16:12:02.789123 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 391, length 64 16:12:03.789111 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 392, length 64 16:12:04.789085 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 393, length 64 16:12:05.789154 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 394, length 64 16:12:06.789099 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 395, length 64 16:12:07.789096 IP 10.252.243.243 > 10.252.243.242: ICMP echo request, id 19207, seq 396, length 64 ^C 47 packets captured 47 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel

    Ping command on pfSense:

    [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw1]/root: ping 10.252.243.243 PING 10.252.243.243 (10.252.243.243): 56 data bytes ^C --- 10.252.243.243 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss [2.4.4-RELEASE][root@fw1]/root: ping 10.252.243.242 PING 10.252.243.242 (10.252.243.242): 56 data bytes ^C --- 10.252.243.242 ping statistics --- 15 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
  • OpenVPN to IPsec source NAT

    NAT
    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    V

    @paul-heidenreich-0
    Outbound NAT doesn't work with policy-based IPSec tunnels. You have to do the NAT inside IPSec.
    It should work with VTI IPSec, however.

    If you have already a phase 2 to for the NAT-IP or subnet at the remote side, an additional is not needed in most cases.

    You have always have to add the remote networdk to the "local networks", no matter if you use BINAT or outbound NAT.

    That's correct. But you didn't mention, that you have already done this.

  • IPsec Down notifications

    IPsec
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    W

    @dragoangel
    Maybe https://forum.netgate.com/category/30/bounties
    If you really need it and are willing to pay for it.
    Else the best you can do is hope that it will come some time...

  • IKEv2 Site-to-Site and MultiWAN on one side

    IPsec
    32
    0 Votes
    32 Posts
    4k Views
    stephenw10S

    Just try to resolve it somewhere. In Diag > DNS Lookup in pfSense for example.

    If you use an IP address or something actually resolves it must match the actual address IPSec is using.