• 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    888 Views
    E
    Hi @Derelict thanks for your help. I will test your recommendation soon, I had a trouble with hosting, the system crashing and I will have to reset and reinstall When I can set all good, I will test your recommendation, and I will to continue with this thread. Thanks you very much
  • 2.4.4-p3 installer binary image download?

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    568 Views
    johnpozJ
    I would suggest contact support - when I asked for an image, I had link in like 1 minute.. There is zero reason to searching around the archives of the internet.. Just contact them - you do not need a support contract for such a question And yeah its good idea to have current image, don't get me wrong... But the time for that is like when you first install it.. Just keep a copy ;) Reason I contact them is wanted factory version of lastest image for my sg4860. And then for the 3100. You use to be able to download them off the portal.. But now you can not get factory version without contacting them for new versions that come out. Is this netgate appliance, or you just using the CE version?
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    287 Views
    No one has replied
  • [SOLVED] First installation, but PC no longer connects

    30
    0 Votes
    30 Posts
    3k Views
    V
    everything worked well and then suddenly stopped working, I am puzzled over this question which is disturbing me more than anything else, i see that i not only me encountered such a challenge but i am unlike others not. I had to be able to disable it from Console too otherwise i would need to make reinstallation..
  • 2.4.5_1 much higher RAM usage than 2.4.4_p3 with no packages

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    513 Views
    nzkiwi68N
    It looks like a larger amount of RAM is taken up for paging, couild this be ZFS file system? SYSTEM MEMORY INFORMATION: mem_wire: 1198047232 ( 1142MB) [ 63%] Wired: disabled for paging out mem_active: + 76308480 ( 72MB) [ 4%] Active: recently referenced mem_inactive:+ 127647744 ( 121MB) [ 6%] Inactive: recently not referenced mem_cache: + 0 ( 0MB) [ 0%] Cached: almost avail. for allocation mem_free: + 497741824 ( 474MB) [ 26%] Free: fully available for allocation mem_gap_vm: + -258048 ( 0MB) [ 0%] Memory gap: UNKNOWN -------------- ------------ ----------- ------ mem_all: = 1899487232 ( 1811MB) [100%] Total real memory managed mem_gap_sys: + 50384896 ( 48MB) Memory gap: Kernel?! -------------- ------------ ----------- mem_phys: = 1949872128 ( 1859MB) Total real memory available mem_gap_hw: + 197611520 ( 188MB) Memory gap: Segment Mappings?! -------------- ------------ ----------- mem_hw: = 2147483648 ( 2048MB) Total real memory installed SYSTEM MEMORY SUMMARY: mem_used: 1522094080 ( 1451MB) [ 70%] Logically used memory mem_avail: + 625389568 ( 596MB) [ 29%] Logically available memory -------------- ------------ ----------- ------ mem_total: = 2147483648 ( 2048MB) [100%] Logically total memory
  • Virgin Media Modem Mode Cannot Retrieve a WAN IP.

    21
    0 Votes
    21 Posts
    2k Views
    ?
    Hi all, apologies for the delay. Took me awhile to find another identical gigabit card to test with since cleaning the riser and card connector with isopropyl didn't work unfortunately. I also had to get a new modem from ISP since mine was way out of support. It is now working fine with DHCP, appears to have been hardware gremlins in the gigabit card and the old modem being clunky with DHCP.
  • First time install - Web interface not loading?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    4k Views
    bmeeksB
    @videogamingtown said in First time install - Web interface not loading?: Got it working after changing the subnet, thanks. . Glad you got it sorted out.
  • Installing new version of Pfsense 2.4.5 and not browsing

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    1k Views
    Raffi_R
    My PC is in network 172.23.134.0 and i can ping normally in this network. I don't know if this are being a problemm You can ping 8.8.8.8 from this network? If so then what is the problem? I cannot help if you are only going to provide little pieces of information each time you think it may or may not help. Provide a full diagram of your network and all LANs, servers (squid?), smart switches. For example, in that diagram show LAN A is able to ping 8.8.8.8 but not access a website, LAN B cannot ping and so on. Are all 3 LANs different interfaces on pfsense? Show that in the diagram.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Awesome, thanks @viktor_g :) I'm pretty new to BSD so was hoping there might be a workaround. Appreciate you taking the time to set it out
  • DNS wont resolve "one" website

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    614 Views
    A
    @calical So enabling the DNS forwarder resolved the issue for you as well?
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    267 Views
    No one has replied
  • New install - no internet (desperate!)

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    304 Views
    DaddyGoD
    @jrhatigan hi So you have modem... ok what can be seen here: [image: 1593702954919-6be12df5-263e-4c7d-9586-63a46c38ffb3-image.png] [image: 1593704218135-9afbcd1c-2ff2-45b5-ab0d-3561ae522762-image.png] ++++edit: -WAN is set to DHCP so far (previous config / router), have you got the WAN IP address with DHCP? -I've reset my modem, 10 min unplugged (not a combo router) it doesn't "reset" - just a cold start 10 min? it may be little, everyone here suggests more time, but it can be ISP dependent (DHCP lease) -ping through pfsense diag from WAN to 8.8.8.8 is coming up as all packets lost this is normal if you don't have a WAN connection the ping can't work outwards 8.8.8.8
  • Change in visible LAN IP after upgrade to 2.4.5

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    355 Views
    D
    OK, it seem this is not working after all and I am really struggling to understand why. The issue exists under 2.4.5 and 2.4.5-1. But not 2.4.4-3. the LAN interface is a bridge comprising vtnet0 and vtnet1.10. vtnet1.10 currently carries traffic, via managed switch, from an Asus access point (both Wireless and wired). pfSense is a Proxmox VM with vtnet0 & vtnet1 on Proxmox bridges. Latter bridge is set 'VLAN aware'. All devices on the bridge are in the same subnet 192.168.0.0/24. pfSense's IP on LAN (bridge) interface is 192.168.0.1. Under pfSense 2.4.4-3, hosts connected to vtnet0 (eg proxy, pihole) see the real IP of incoming connections from clients on vtnet1.10. No problem. Under pfSense 2.4.5+, this is also true. Other than for DNS traffic: Hosts on vtnet0 will always see the pfsense LAN IP 192.168.0.1 as the remote device. The DNS replies are still successfully received. The effect is something akin to NAT between the two component interfaces of the bridge, but only for DNS traffic. I have dumped the nat & firewall rules from the command line and do not see anything that might target DNS specifically in this situation. As I say, it worked OK under pfSense 2.4.4-3. The pihole could discern the ip addresses of all the clients. Now it only sees those on vtnet0 and for those on vtnet1.10, it only ses the pfsense LAN IP.
  • 2.4.5_1 problem

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    977 Views
    GertjanG
    Ok. Your nearly there. Contact the admin of your pfSense. Ask him why he installed bind - and why he didn't terminate the setup. Explain him it's impossible to have tow web servers on the same server or two mail servers or two DNS caches/resolvers/forwarders that listen to the same ports : 953 in this case. Let him make up his choice, an relocate port 953 of the two process : unbound or bind. Port 953 is the 'control' port. Fr bind, it's the rndc program that use this port to control the bind while it's running.
  • My pfsense appliance Netgate SG-4860-1u just died on me during upgrade

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    777 Views
    H
    Thank you guys, I will talk to netgate.
  • Wan not coming up, fresh install.

    wan gateway comcast help
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    GertjanG
    @cfbcfb said in Wan not coming up, fresh install.: Connected to the router via wifi and my phone, got a "this network wants you to sign in" and when I clicked that, it brought up the comcast login That's your OS / brower playing the captive portal detection mode ! That means your WAN is using a RFC1918 IP, and when you start your bowser it hits the GUI web server of the modem, because it's router part is redirecting the browser requests to it's internal Web GUI, where you have to login. What about playing with these option on the WAN interface : [image: 1593497689916-37b478df-9583-49cc-9cf0-9fd448fc633f-image.png] See manual - Advanced Configuration.
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    681 Views
    C
    Thanks all for the suggestions. Of course, the tutorials all had one external physical port for WAN and the private for the LAN, then never really explained how to connect the LAN part to a physical port. So if I have this right, I have TWO externals, one for WAN and one for LAN, set autostart on the vm (I think its set that way already as pfsense came up started after a reboot) and disable VMQ if its there. I did look at the hardware acceleration and saw IPSEC accel and something else (forget) which sounded helpful, but this is my first enterprise grade card. Cheap on amazon right now, $32 "renewed" (server pull from a proliant. Look for hp four port enterprise to find it. Two intel Gb controllers, four ports. I'll give it a go in the morning and report back how it went. If all else fails, I have an unfortunately large cube with an i5-6400, 8GB of ram and a small SSD. Love to have it on this always-on machine with the water cooled 6700K and 32GB, but if the vm/pfsense thing just keeps stymieing me, guess I'll run it dedicated and play with trying to get it working on the vm on the bigger machine. Been in computers for 40 years, and this is my first VM and "make your own router/firewall" experiment. I already had a fun time using Windows Spaces (sort of a software raid capability with parity) with a mishmash of old 2GB drives, four of them made a 7.5GB parity fault tolerant array. Cool, the drives can even be different sizes and/or geometries, internal or external usb/esata and it still uses the whole thing, like JBOD but with parity. Plus 550MB/s reads and 250MB/s writes with 4 old 5400 rpm WD green drives of varying age. Anyhow, I'll report back in tomorrow. Thanks for the support and understanding, you don't always get nice helpful folks on forums.
  • PfSense 2.4.x on T610 Plus

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    3k Views
    ihaverouterI
    So the issue is smp https://people.freebsd.org/~kuriyama/www/smp/index.html smp in relation to "Safe Mode" was discussed here: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pfsense-what-exactly-is-that-safe-mode.56524/ To resolve this issue, I went into pfsense admin. Go to Diagnostics / Edit File. Find file: /boot/loader.conf Add the following: kern.smp.disabled=1 Reboot Note: Disabling smp has some performance side-effects.
  • Slow internet speed with pfsense on VMware workstation

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    V
    Issue resolved after attaching USB LAN card. Now I am getting full upload and download speed with MDS and SNORT enabled. It is stable for now lets see how it work for one week :)
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    217 Views
    W
    All good sorry. No idea what happened
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.