Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you may not be able to execute some actions.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Categories
81585 Topics
464705 Posts
There are already "Cron" entries in the configuration.. Adding the package gives you a way to edit them easily.
12028 Topics
77695 Posts
@derpy456789 said in Potential Suricata Inline Netmap Solution:
Hello NollipfSense,
Just wondering what kind of system/specs are you running suricata inline on and also did you change any setting inside the interface setting of suricata like the Detection engine settings for max pending packets ?
Ive been getting the same error
netmap_grab_packets bad pkt
Thanks
Sorry for the late reply...I am running an HP Pavillion a6242n with Intel 82575 NIC 8GB RAM.
34509 Topics
217739 Posts
E
Buenas, sí tengo squid.
Pero quiero priorizar el acceso a una aplicación de la google play store, izitravel.
Cómo sería? gracias
Information about hardware available from Netgate
302 Topics
1864 Posts
C
Dear All,
I have a hardware box which is continue running on 90%/99% CPU which cause alot of pakket los on the WAN side.
I have checked the IO Operation
/0 /1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10
Load Average ||||
/0% /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100
cpu user|XXX
nice|
system|XX
interrupt|
idle|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
/0% /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100
ada0 MB/s
tps|XXXX
pass0 MB/s
tps|
and the interupt CPU usages
[code]PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K RUN 1 158:26 91.77% [idle{idle: cpu1}]
11 root 155 ki31 0K 32K RUN 0 160:42 79.55% [idle{idle: cpu0}]
10682 root 21 0 112M 22368K accept 1 0:04 2.05% /usr/local/bin/php-cgi
12 root -60 - 0K 400K CPU0 0 2:17 0.48% [intr{swi4: clock (0)}]
12 root -92 - 0K 400K WAIT 0 0:29 0.24% [intr{irq259: em1:rx0}]
88373 root 20 0 20076K 3804K CPU1 1 0:00 0.22% top -aSH
21352 root 20 0 49640K 8628K kqread 1 0:43 0.12% /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd -f /var/etc/lighty-webConfigurator.conf
423 root 52 0 132M 32328K accept 0 0:20 0.08% /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/opnsense/service/configd.py console{python2.7}
46510 root 20 0 1061M 6584K select 1 0:01 0.08% /usr/local/sbin/openvpn --config /var/etc/openvpn/client2.conf
12 root -92 - 0K 400K WAIT 0 0:05 0.05% [intr{irq262: em2:rx0}]
18706 root 20 0 1049M 2760K select 0 0:04 0.03% /usr/local/sbin/apinger -c /var/etc/apinger.conf
62443 root 20 0 1091M 6864K select 1 0:00 0.03% sshd: root@pts/0 (sshd)
16 root -16 - 0K 16K pftm 0 0:05 0.03% [pf purge]
12 root -92 - 0K 400K WAIT 1 0:03 0.03% [intr{irq260: em1:tx0}]
17 root -16 - 0K 16K - 1 0:03 0.01% [rand_harvestq]
968 root 29 0 97112K 22380K select 1 46:15 0.01% /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/opnsense/scripts/netflow/flowd_aggregate.py
4 root -16 - 0K 32K - 1 0:05 0.01% [cam{doneq0}]
4692 root 20 0 1051M 3028K select 0 0:03 0.01% /usr/local/sbin/syslogd -s -c -c -P /var/run/syslog.pid -l /var/dhcpd/var/run/log -f /var/
85922 root 20 0 1051M 6124K select 0 0:02 0.01% /usr/local/sbin/ntpd -g -c /var/etc/ntpd.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid{ntpd}
12 root -92 - 0K 400K WAIT 1 0:01 0.01% [intr{irq263: em2:tx0}]
29963 dhcpd 20 0 24732K 8788K select 1 0:01 0.01% /usr/local/sbin/dhcpd -user dhcpd -group dhcpd -chroot /var/dhcpd -cf /etc/dhcpd.conf -pf
12 root -88 - 0K 400K WAIT 0 0:03 0.01% [intr{irq19: ahci0}]
0 root -4 - 0K 320K - 0 0:02 0.01% [kernel{/ trim}]
18 root -16 - 0K 48K psleep 1 0:00 0.00% [pagedaemon{pagedaemon}]
94464 root 20 0 38816K 5740K kqread 1 0:01 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd -f /var/etc/lighttpd-acme-challenge.conf
14975 root 20 0 1053M 2824K bpf 1 0:01 0.00% /usr/local/sbin/filterlog -i pflog0 -p /var/run/filterlog.pid
42547 root 20 0 1061M 6592K select 1 0:00 0.00% /usr/loc
The firewall is running just simple 2 firewall rules, any to any on the LAN and OPENVPN on the WAN nothing else.
i just wanna make sure we are not dealing with a faulty hardware.
Can someone please point me to the right directions to check ?
Thank you
6 Topics
14 Posts
The current plan is to make TNSR available on all XG series (desktop and rack mount). So yes, that would include the XG-7100. Availability dates are TBD, but enabling customers to fully leverage their appliance investment via high performance packet processing software (TNSR) is a growing part of our business. Let me know if you have any other questions.
Information about hardware available from Netgate
0 Topics
0 Posts
1954 Topics
9951 Posts
I just don't like the forum new look, and my using experience...I get the feeling it's more to promote Netgate than PfSense, despite the claim to be in compliant with new regulations. Also, pictures posted in the old format should have been preserved and displayed respecting the users. I hardly visit now.
© Copyright 2002 - 2018 Rubicon Communications, LLC | Privacy Policy
