Categories

  • 465 Topics
    1k Posts
    A
    @Said.Fathy , Hi Said .. I'd strongly recommend Lawrence Systems' youtube channel... it's the best as far as pfsense is concerned.. from beginner to pro https://www.youtube.com/@LAWRENCESYSTEMS
  • 121k Topics
    769k Posts
    TangoOverswayT
    @johnpoz It's working fine now, which makes me think it's some kind of caching issue. I find it weird that Chrome could connect to palantir-02 yesterday, immediately, and the command line tools could not. I use iTerm2, which is a 3rd party terminal program that, so far, as exceeded the functionality of Apple's Term program, but I can't help but thinking that there might be some DNS caching being done somewhere that impacts the term programs and that Chrome doesn't deal with. I have several learning disabilities and it's an attention span thing. It takes me longer to dig into something than it does for most people. There's a line and when I cross it, and dive deep into something, I can get a clear understanding of everything in it, but six months later, if I haven't kept working with that material, I can forget it all - unless I do another deep dive. So I've dealt with this kind of stuff before, but long enough ago, that I've forgotten all that's involved. I probably should have looked up the command to clear the Mac's networking cache, but didn't think of it yesterday, when it would have helped. I did consider just rebooting, but didn't have the time while I was at the computer. (I figured that'd clear any DNS caching it may have done.) I have been able to resolve anything with ping in the past - never an issue. I'm in a rural setting, so there are times I lose internet. I have a simple alias: alias icheck='ping -c 5 8.8.8.8;echo;ping -c 5 www.google.com;echo;echo' or something close to that, you get the idea. When I seem to be having connectivity issues, I always run that to see if our internet is down. I did run it just as a quick check (yesterday, when the issue was happening) and it did work.
  • 20k Topics
    128k Posts
    M
    @Jim-Coogan said in "Tailscale is not online" problem: @yobyot I think maybe it is node key expiring at 180 days? fwiw I have discovered that running in shell tailscale down tailscale up --force-reauth will give you a URL you can then paste in browser and it re authenticates and gets pfsense back online as the same machine and status shows this in pf tailscale UI. This is reauthing the node key. @Jim-Coogan Looks like your fix is working for me with the packaged Tailscale 1.82.4 on 25.07. Thanks. Previously, if I rebooted pfSense or started/stopped tailscale, tailscale wouldn't reconnect even though key expiry was disabled. After following your steps with an expiry-disabled key, tailscale reconnects after restarts and reboots. Hoping that continues ... I'm sure I'll find out.
  • 43k Topics
    267k Posts
    micneuM
    @BernardoUI bitte mal screenshots von deinen Firewall Regeln usw. Bitte auch von outbound NAT
  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    3k Topics
    21k Posts
    R
    Great! I see what you’ve set up. I’m using custom hardware, and in addition, I’ve taken the following steps for the configuration and works!: 1- Add the following lines to your snmpd.conf file (Multiples CPU cores): extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.0.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.1.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.2.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.3.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.4.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.5.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.6.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" extend temp_cpu /bin/sh -c "/sbin/sysctl -n dev.cpu.7.temperature | tr -d 'C' | tr -d '\n'" [image: 1761225286560-6590abd6-87e7-4927-a972-e15eab52c07f-image-resized.png] 2- Verify the return string information. command: snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull Result: NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu0" = STRING: 39.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu1" = STRING: 40.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu2" = STRING: 37.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu3" = STRING: 38.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu4" = STRING: 37.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu5" = STRING: 38.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu6" = STRING: 41.0 NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu7" = STRING: 42.0 [image: 1761225619366-c97be0c5-31dd-4554-a4c7-27d0094a167d-image.png] 3- Get the OID value corresponding to each individual CPU core. Command: snmptranslate -On 'NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB::nsExtendOutputFull."temp_cpu0"' Result: .1.3.6.1.4.1.8072.1.3.2.3.1.2.9.116.101.109.112.95.99.112.117.48 [image: 1761225732181-bfc00e8f-cc48-4f31-a8d4-d53c24a88ef9-image.png] Repeat for each CPU Core to have 08 OIDs. On the PRTG side, perform the following steps: 1- Add SNMP Custom Advanced [image: 1761226218994-495d657f-8e6f-4b74-81e1-543f4dd37f29-image.png] 2- Fill up the information for each CPU: Sensor Type: SNMP Custom Advanced (supports up to 10 channels) Channel 1: Name CPU0, OID = numeric for "temp_cpu0", Unit = °C, Value Type = Float/Gauge Channel 2: Name CPU1, OID = numeric for "temp_cpu1", Unit = °C, Value Type = Float/Gauge … up to CPU7 [image: 1761226386844-db1ddb5b-ac5d-4d29-ad03-0c4b8b22c143-image.png] 3- The graph is populated for each CPU core. [image: 1761226541965-d83f6cce-b37c-48f6-af76-ed864454f72a-image.png]
  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    44 Topics
    211 Posts
    AriKellyA
    It looks like unified web management could be coming soon. It would be great if it means easier control and management of all web services in one place. Let's see if any companies announce more details about it!
  • Feel free to talk about anything and everything here

    4k Topics
    19k Posts
    G
    @stephenw10 This is my final note since it seem you will always look at this as an endpoint. It doesn't appear, it actually is, the facts are the facts. Still, moderator usually have a way to remove posts and ban single users, not just the entire herd, or at least the ones use. Perhaps those are more advance, or perhaps netgate forums lack that functionality. I never said negate took this issue lightly, I was just looking for some feedback. I have seen this process many times and for the looks of it, pfsense CE is very much in maintenance mode. Just because netgate wants to be politically correct does not mean it is not. The fact are there and they are fallowing the same path as others did. Again, this subject is just becoming redundant and it is affecting other users in the forum.
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.