Categories

• TNSR

  Discussions about TNSR

  • TNSR Announcements
  • TNSR Feedback
  • Problems Installing or Upgrading TNSR Software
  381 Topics

  1k Posts

  M

  Following up on this.. EVPN at the control plane with a anycast gateway would help here....
• pfSense® Software

  Discussions about pfSense Software, click a category below

  • Messages from the pfSense Team
  • General pfSense Questions
  • Netgate Nexus
  • Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
  • Firewalling
  • NAT
  • HA/CARP/VIPs
  • L2/Switching/VLANs
  • Routing and Multi WAN
  • Traffic Shaping
  • DHCP and DNS
  • IPv6
  • IPsec
  • OpenVPN
  • Captive Portal
  • webGUI
  • Wireless
  • SNMP
  • Documentation
  • Development
  • Gaming
  • Virtualization
  • Hardware
  • Bounties
  • Retired
  122k Topics

  785k Posts

  A

  We are also facing same issue on same upgrade from 2.8.1 to 2.9.0 on Proxmox 9 VM. Whereas on our vSphere 7 vSAN cluster 2 out of 4 VMs are upgraded successfully. We are running PFSense Master/Backup CARP clusters in our different security zones. Where some master are on Proxmox Ceph cluster and their backups nodes are on vSphere vSAN cluster and vice versa. Can netgate admin or anyone else guide us how to solve this issue ?
• pfSense Packages

  Discussions about pfSense software packages

  • Cache/Proxy
  • IDS/IPS
  • Traffic Monitoring
  • pfBlockerNG
  • UPS Tools
  • ACME
  • FRR
  • Tailscale
  • WireGuard
  21k Topics

  130k Posts

  E

  Updated CE 2.8.1 to 1.102.3_1. (I'm holding out for 2.9.1 or .2) Note: VPN on demand not working as expected on some platforms https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/20755 Freshports pkg add -f https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/latest/All/tailscale-1.102.3_1.pkg Changelog
• pfSense International Support

  Discuss pfSense in other languages

  • Chinese
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Indonesian
  • Italiano
  • Russian
  • Nederlands
  • Norwegian
  • Portuguese
  • Polish
  • Romanian
  • Swedish
  • Turkish
  43k Topics

  268k Posts

  C

  Hallo zusammen, ich habe ein merkwürdiges Verhalten mit dem Traffic Shaper (ALTQ / HFSC) unter pfSense Plus 26.07 festgestellt. Meine Internetleitung unterstützt 150 Mbit/s Upload. Wenn ich im Traffic Shaper bei der WAN-Root-Queue qInternet folgende Werte eintrage: Bandwidth: 100000 Kbit/s → ca. 100 Mbit/s Upload Bandwidth: 150000 Kbit/s → nur ca. 75 Mbit/s Upload Bandwidth: 200000 Kbit/s → ca. 100 Mbit/s Upload Bandwidth: 300000 Kbit/s → ca. 150 Mbit/s Upload Das Verhalten ist damit praktisch: bis 100 Mbit/s → korrekt über 100 Mbit/s → tatsächlicher Durchsatz ≈ eingestellter Wert / 2 Beispiel: Shaper: 150000 Kbit/s Resultat: ~75 Mbit/s Shaper: 300000 Kbit/s Resultat: ~150 Mbit/s Der Anschluss selbst kann die 150 Mbit/s problemlos liefern. Das lässt sich daran erkennen, dass ich mit einem Shaper-Wert von 300000 Kbit/s tatsächlich ungefähr 150 Mbit/s erreiche. Konfiguration Ich verwende ALTQ / HFSC. WAN: WAN └── qInternet ├── qACK ├── qDefault ├── qVoIP ├── qOthersHigh └── qOthersLow Die WAN-Root-Queue qInternet ist beispielsweise so konfiguriert: Bandwidth: 300000 Kbit/s Upper Limit: 300000 Kb Link Share: 300000 Kb Damit erreiche ich ca. 150 Mbit/s Upload. Die entsprechenden Werte bei 150000 Kbit/s führen dagegen nur zu ca. 75 Mbit/s. Interessanterweise scheint der Effekt nicht einfach durch die Child-Queues verursacht zu werden, da sich die Halbierung reproduzierbar an der 100-Mbit-Grenze zeigt. Frage Ist dieses Verhalten bei pfSense Plus 26.07 / ALTQ / HFSC bekannt? Gibt es möglicherweise eine 100-Mbit-Grenze, Integer-/Unit-Problematik oder einen Bug bei der Berechnung der HFSC-Bandbreite? Hat jemand mit einer Leitung >100 Mbit/s und HFSC ein ähnliches Verhalten? Als Workaround muss ich momentan für gewünschte 150 Mbit/s Upload einen Wert von 300000 Kbit/s eintragen. Vielen Dank!
• Official Netgate® Hardware

  Information about hardware available from Netgate
  3k Topics

  21k Posts

  R

  We have a customer with a small remote office. The Netgate 1100 there is not stable. 26.07. We haven't seen this issue on any other netgate device, we mainly have 1100 and 2100 devices. This one from time to time loses its WAN connection, leaving us unable to access it. Checking the logs, during reboot of the 1100 I saw this: [image: 1788761064601-927352ee-d6fe-4cb2-8585-b10a2c112eaf-image.png] After over 2000 of these 'bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly' messages, it 'just' continues with it's boot: [image: 1788761124515-fe5a271d-62ed-4d6c-84c8-b7d4f4821834-image.png] I've never seen this before. Before I check all logs thouroughly, what would this 'bus_dmamem_alloc failed to align memory properly' mean? [edit] I just checked my Netgate 2100 at my home office, and that does excactly the same running 26.07. So probably it's nothing specific to that 1100, yet I still wonder what all those messages mean.
• Netgate Announcements

  Information about hardware available from Netgate
  44 Topics

  211 Posts

  A

  It looks like unified web management could be coming soon. It would be great if it means easier control and management of all web services in one place. Let's see if any companies announce more details about it!
• Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion

  Feel free to talk about anything and everything here

  • Forum Feedback
  • Community Job Board
  4k Topics

  19k Posts

  M

  Thank you very much!