Categories

  • 444 Topics
    1k Posts

    I have a 2 TNSR routers connected to a pair of MLAG connected switches. I also have my own IPV4 subnet that is being announcec by BGP via Interface 1 on the first TNSR device. I have no problems at all right now, all of the servers on my network can access the internet and be accessed via their public IP address.

    What I am struggling with now is segregating clients into VLANs. When I create an access VLAN (22) for my client, I can no longer access the internet. My understanding is that I must create a bridge so that the VLAN22 can access the LAN interface with the gateway IP assigned. Each VLAN client will have a public IP from the single /24 subnet.

    When I followed the instructions for TNSR VLAN, nothing seemed to be problematic, but when I created the bridge things went wonky. Not only do the VLANs not work, but I also lose access to the non-VLAN devices.

    interface bridge domain 10
    flood
    uu-flood
    forward
    learn
    exit

    int Interface1
    bridge domain 10
    enable
    exit
    int Interface1.22
    bridge domain 10
    enable
    exit
    interface loopback bridgeloop
    instance 1
    exit
    interface loop1
    ip address 10.25.254.1/24
    bridge domain 10 bvi
    enable
    exit

    I did try changing the loop1 IP to my gateway IP and removing it from Interface1 but that didn't help. Maybe I am going about this wrong, but I need some guidance if possible.

    Thanks,
    Shawn

    For background:
    On TNSR device1:
    Interface1 is connected to a switch that carries my upstream BGP using a 10.34.14.0/24 address for now.
    Interface2 is the interface that has my gateway IP 23.x.x.x/24 and is also the port connected to the first switch.
    Interface3 is connected to a second switch and has no IP address

    TNSR device2 :
    Interface1 is connected to the switch that carreies the BGP but has no IP address and for all practical purposes is doing nothing

    Interface 2 is connected to the 2nd switch and has no IP address

    Interface 3 is connected to the first switch and has no IP address

    As you can see, the 2nd TNSR device is mostly sitting around doing nothing but eventually should be integrated in via VRRP or whatever I can get working.

  • 120k Topics
    759k Posts

    Hi
    Running pfsense Version 24.11-RELEASE.

    Can someone please help me troubleshoot why internal/local domain is not resolving to IPv6, but external domains properly resolve to IPv6:.

    Internal domain does not resolve to IPv6, only resolves to IPv4:

    C:\Users\sadam>nslookup officevm-1
    Server: syn-2603-8001-3400-4a00-02e0-edff-fec4-b04e.res6.spectrum.com
    Address: 2603:8001:3400:4a00:2e0:edff:fec4:b04e

    Name: officevm-1.skubsad.com
    Address: 192.168.221.100

    External domains resolve to IPv6 and IPv4 correctly:

    nslookup microsoft.com
    Server: syn-2603-8001-3400-4a00-02e0-edff-fec4-b04e.res6.spectrum.com
    Address: 2603:8001:3400:4a00:2e0:edff:fec4:b04e

    Non-authoritative answer:
    Name: microsoft.com
    Addresses: 2603:1030:b:3::152
    2603:1030:20e:3::23c
    2603:1030:c02:8::14
    2603:1020:201:10::10f
    2603:1010:3:3::5b

    13.107.253.69

    Running ISC DHCPv6 server:

    67c79397-9ed9-4ad0-a33f-f7e38121472d-image.png

    Router Advertisement set to DHCPv6 server:

    076e5d5f-e7d5-4492-8ea8-1aa2c551bc62-image.png

    DNS Resolver enabled on IPv6 interfaces:

    5abcfbde-fb7a-4685-addb-90fb04517b34-image.png

    DHCPv6 leases are showing up, although without hostname:

    4177655d-c3ed-4bc6-9d7e-94180c3c3d2d-image.png

    I'd appreciate any pointers or help.

    Thanks in advance.
    SMK

  • 20k Topics
    127k Posts

    I have the same issue after upgrading from 2.7.2 to 2.8.0.
    When trying to start squid the below message is shown in syslog:

    php-fpm[71339]: /pkg_edit.php: The command '/usr/local/sbin/squid -f /usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf' returned exit code '1', the output was 'ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/squid: Undefined symbol "_ZTVNSt3__117bad_function_callE"'

  • 43k Topics
    267k Posts

    @heiko3001
    Okay, danke. Interessante Sache mit dem NTP. Ich hatte bislang jedoch noch kein Ernst zu nehmendes Bedürfnis verspürt, einen solchen selbst zu betreiben. Aber egal.

    Du hast also Dual-WAN.
    Hast du etwa eine Interface Gruppe, auf der eingehender Traffic erlaubt ist oder Floating Regel dafür?
    Falls ja, müsstest du diese entfernen.

    Falls nicht, wäre Packet Capture das Mittel hier für das Troubleshooting, um zu sehen, ob der weitergeleitete Traffic auf am richtigen internen Interface raus geht und vom Ziel-Host auch Antworten zurückkommen und wenn, ob diese wieder am richtigen WAN raus gehen.

  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    2k Topics
    20k Posts

    A patch is now available for testing on the redmine.

  • Information about hardware available from Netgate

    44 Topics
    211 Posts

    It looks like unified web management could be coming soon. It would be great if it means easier control and management of all web services in one place. Let's see if any companies announce more details about it!

  • Feel free to talk about anything and everything here

    3k Topics
    19k Posts
Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.